It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Nunes Wins Battle With Rosenstein to See Trump Probe Document

page: 4
54
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 08:19 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Yeah the implant that volunteers to go to jail.

Wow that's right up there with a lawyer who pays the price of a small house to a porn star on his clients behalf.

They do value loyalty don't they?
Haha ha hahaha ha ha.




posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 08:22 AM
link   
a reply to: scraedtosleep

We already knew that.
Now we wait for the IG who will confirm it.



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 08:29 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Say for instance...Then write a little tale. That's your imagination son.



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 08:31 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

You remember people thought the FISA warrant didn't exist? I must have missed those conversations.



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 08:34 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

So how did you make this leap?

Wishful thinking?



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 08:43 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Are you still on that Putin and Trump colluded BS? How can you still be defending this obvious bull caca?



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 08:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burntheships

A redaction is now an implication?


That's what they're doing?
Covering for each other?

Not protecting the innocent or protecting allied sources?



Congressional oversight is exempted from any and all privacy laws etc. Nothing should be redacted when provided to Congress for oversight. Members of the few committees (house and senate) dealing with this type of stuff al have security clearance.

It would be like providing a warrant to a judge that is redacted.

It wont fly there and doesnt fly wit this.



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 08:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

You remember people thought the FISA warrant didn't exist? I must have missed those conversations.


Considering FISA stuff is classified and not released to the public one has to wonder who leaked that info. Thats right, the left wing media did with their left wing sources who broke the law to do it.



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 08:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

So how did you make this leap?

Wishful thinking?


Publicly available information...



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 08:52 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

From what I've read, the "unredacted" warrant contained one redaction to protect a foreign source. We'll have to see if that's good enough for Nunes.



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 08:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
a reply to: Xcathdra

From what I've read, the "unredacted" warrant contained one redaction to protect a foreign source. We'll have to see if that's good enough for Nunes.


Which narrows it down to 2 possibilities -
* - Steele from the UK
* - The Australian diplomat.

Both of which were created by the Clinton dossier.



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 08:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra




Both of which were created by the Clinton dossier.

Who paid for that again?



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 09:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Xcathdra




Both of which were created by the Clinton dossier.

Who paid for that again?


Clinton, the DNC and Obamas charity / pac / foundation / what ever the hell he cal;s it.



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 09:53 AM
link   
a reply to: JinMI




If Strzok has as most of the influence over the warrant as what is implied, then given his history and antics, I'm doubting it will hold up.
I am starting to believe that Strzok ,I mean Andy will some how show up dead in the near future . That one dot has been very convenient for too long . Their play is falling apart . Surely they would not of needed to redact Steel's name or the British Govt because we already know their names ... It can't be Russia , because Russia Russia Russia . How about Ukraine ? Maybe Israel ?



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 09:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra




Which narrows it down to 2 possibilities - * - Steele from the UK * - The Australian diplomat.
But why would they redact names of people we already know about ?



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 09:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: Xcathdra




Which narrows it down to 2 possibilities - * - Steele from the UK * - The Australian diplomat.
But why would they redact names of people we already know about ?


Why would they stall for 8 months, risking criminal contempt charges and impeachment, only to redact it to the point of it being unreadable and then underacting most of it except for the key people?

Congress is not subject to the privacy laws. All members of the intel committees and a few others have the clearance to see redacted documents.

Why are they hiding the names? Probably because revealing the names would confirm they used Clintons dossier for the entire illegal investigation.



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 10:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: JinMI




If Strzok has as most of the influence over the warrant as what is implied, then given his history and antics, I'm doubting it will hold up.
I am starting to believe that Strzok ,I mean Andy will some how show up dead in the near future . That one dot has been very convenient for too long . Their play is falling apart . Surely they would not of needed to redact Steel's name or the British Govt because we already know their names ... It can't be Russia , because Russia Russia Russia . How about Ukraine ? Maybe Israel ?

Perhaps the redacted source is Skirpal (the guy who got poisoned). It's been rumored he was working with Steele. The attempt on his life is most likely MI6 trying to tie up loose ends.*** The fact that Steele himself is still alive (as far as we know) makes me wonder if it was him who poisoned the guy and his daughter.

***Notice how they never did provide any proof Russia was responsible.
edit on 12-4-2018 by AndyFromMichigan because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 11:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

Yeah the implant that volunteers to go to jail.



BwaaaHaHa

They didn't think they would get outed.

Remember the DNC was arrogantly "invincible" at the time 😎

Not enough "is" "there" 👋



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 11:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: RadioRobert

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Phage

You're right. It was likely Lichtenstein all along.


At first I thought it was Guilder, but it turns out Prince Humperdink actually hired a Sicilian to frame them.


And it was revealed the Sicilian has a Grandfather born in Seborga !!

😉



posted on Apr, 12 2018 @ 11:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
After months of stalling, the highly classified document that
was used to obtain the FISA warrant to spy on Donald Trump's
campaign officials has finally been released to Devin Nunes.

It is reported that Nunes and Gowdy and viewed the document
in an electronic form, with minimal redactions.




This means that the DOJ is no longer worried about sharing that part of the investigation with Trumps mini-me Nunes.

A real indicator that the investigation is moving quickly. They have already filled in the blanks on the original intelligence.

Interesting that Nunes isn't holding press conferences shouting about what he saw?

Must have been unsettling.




top topics



 
54
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join