It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Since Gazrok has put together a great synopsis on Roswell full of facts, its worth mentioning various tactics skeptics use. Stanton Friedman has often said that sceptics, when they cannot attack the facts, will attack the witnesses instead, attacking their characters.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Well the thing is, Adamski really had no facts and solid evidence to stand on. Attacking a witness sometimes is acceotable when their stories simply are contridictory, fraudulent, or questionable.
Adamski really provided no evidence for his claims, and there was plenty of evidence against him. His claims were easily refuted, and his open chatracter and past history of unscrupulous behavior make his claims questiobale. Im sure that perhaps Adamski did see a UFO once, but embelished the tale to absurd proportions.
The point im trying to make, is that sceptics, when the actual facts of the case are near impossible to refute, will resort to disinformation and unwarranted character assasination on people which simply is not true. Since the facts of a solid UFO case pretty much stand on their own, sceptics will start blowing small things out of proportion, even to the tune of making things up.
Adamski really had no solid case to stabd on, and his con-man behavior and his own quotes about why he got into this "saucer crap".
If Adamski had a bit more solid a case, then Id defend his character, but for the most part, he and the other contactees really killed their own credibility. One didnt need to make up things about Adamski. He did a good enough job assassinating his own character.
Nice work done on the Roswell case Gazrok.Perhaps you can begin to understand what I tried to do on the Adamski thread, with all the witnesses and stuff
Many false allegations have been made against Major Marcel and other witnesses. allegations and a web of BS mostly woven by the govornment and debunkers. But when we actually examine what the witnesses have gone on the record as saying, and what they can truly be quoted as saying, we see the only ones changing the story or the facts to fit their own belief systems are the Air Force and big time rabid debunkers like Philip Klass.