It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BREAKING: Sessions makes HUGE announcement on FBI text messages

page: 8
109
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 11:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: JBurns

If America is brought down because two regular FBI agents dislike Trump, .


Regular? Lol. You make it sound like he was some nameless FBI guy in a field office. Look at all the things he's be a part of.

He's near ground zero of the every key part of the Clinton / Trump Saga.




posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 11:09 PM
link   
The FBI Is Looking Guilty As Hell In Russia Probe

www.investors.com...



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 12:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Tempter
The FBI Is Looking Guilty As Hell In Russia Probe

www.investors.com...


I read that earlier today too. The unfortunate thing is this. The vast majority of the FBI are comprised of very, VERY, good and upstanding patriots. It's unfortunate the top layer of the FBI is so corrupt and has given the good patriots of the FBI such a negative light.

Comey is complicit and presented such a boy scout image during his tenure at the FBI and I want to see pious people like him knocked from their perch.



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 03:01 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

There might be a reason to believe that the reason the FBI is saying that the text messages are missing is because they made the story up to begin with in order to take the heat off themselves for the whole FISA thing ...tick tock



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 09:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: butcherguy

See ISSA and WRAY discuss this in the video above.


I don't have 4 hours right now.


It's 5 minutes.

But willful ignorance noted.

You noted no time to view the portion and the video appeared to be over 4 hours long.


Not sure how to have a discussion with the willfully ignorant or the willfully dishonest.

My original post..for the 3rd time.


originally posted by: soberbacchus

It starts with Issa Questioning Wray at the 51:40 Mark
CSPAN VIdeo FF to 51:40




posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 09:39 AM
link   
Just gonna say this once.

The FBI lost unknown number text in a "computer glitch"? BULL#!

My ENTIRE hospital was ransomed and I only lost PARTS of 12 records.

Now I'm better than the FBI?

COME ON PEOPLE! WAKE UP!



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 09:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: butcherguy

See ISSA and WRAY discuss this in the video above.


I don't have 4 hours right now.


It's 5 minutes.

But willful ignorance noted.

You noted no time to view the portion and the video appeared to be over 4 hours long.


Not sure how to have a discussion with the willfully ignorant or the willfully dishonest.

My original post..for the 3rd time.


originally posted by: soberbacchus

It starts with Issa Questioning Wray at the 51:40 Mark
CSPAN VIdeo FF to 51:40


Yet you are still typing.
I watched at your noted time, watched the part that you had transcribed from the video, and didn't see the part that you alluded to regarding the demotion being caused by an affair. I did not watch the remaining hours of video to find it, mainly because the guy testifying is the one that waited until he was going to be held in contempt of Congress for not turning over information... only to tell us later that they 'lost' 5 crucial months of texts between Strzok and Page.
He is not trustworthy.



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 10:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: butcherguy

See ISSA and WRAY discuss this in the video above.


I don't have 4 hours right now.


It's 5 minutes.

But willful ignorance noted.

You noted no time to view the portion and the video appeared to be over 4 hours long.


Not sure how to have a discussion with the willfully ignorant or the willfully dishonest.

My original post..for the 3rd time.


originally posted by: soberbacchus

It starts with Issa Questioning Wray at the 51:40 Mark
CSPAN VIdeo FF to 51:40


Yet you are still typing.
I watched at your noted time, watched the part that you had transcribed from the video.


You still seem to be lying?

Which is it? I noted a time but you had technical difficulties?

Or your last post?



You noted no time to view the portion and the video


Willful ignorance or willful dishonesty?



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 10:30 AM
link   
Don't you just call up the NSA and tell them to send over the messages?

The NSA collects everything. They admitted it and it is common knowledge. Are you telling me that anything you delete on the user end deletes the NSA system? Of course not.

Why is this a big deal just get the messages. Same with the Hillary emails. I didn't understand that either. Is their some type of legal hoop you have to jump through with the NSA that makes this procedure impossible?



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 11:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: butcherguy

See ISSA and WRAY discuss this in the video above.


I don't have 4 hours right now.


It's 5 minutes.

But willful ignorance noted.

You noted no time to view the portion and the video appeared to be over 4 hours long.


Not sure how to have a discussion with the willfully ignorant or the willfully dishonest.

My original post..for the 3rd time.


originally posted by: soberbacchus

It starts with Issa Questioning Wray at the 51:40 Mark
CSPAN VIdeo FF to 51:40


Yet you are still typing.
I watched at your noted time, watched the part that you had transcribed from the video.


You still seem to be lying?

Which is it? I noted a time but you had technical difficulties?

Or your last post?



You noted no time to view the portion and the video


Willful ignorance or willful dishonesty?

You didn't note a time for the part that you claim. I watched at the time that you put in your post (which has a number of edits) but didn't hear what you claimed.



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 04:21 PM
link   
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

How stupid to think that "TWO" FBI people could possible have any effect on a presidential election. They were simply expressing their opinion. To think that text messages between two people could possible carry any weight is proof that your an idiot.



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 04:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: hoss53
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

How stupid to think that "TWO" FBI people could possible have any effect on a presidential election. They were simply expressing their opinion. To think that text messages between two people could possible carry any weight is proof that your an idiot.


2 "so far"

and we don't know how many will never be exposed

could be 100's

WHTIE

Q



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 04:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: hoss53
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

How stupid to think that "TWO" FBI people could possible have any effect on a presidential election. They were simply expressing their opinion. To think that text messages between two people could possible carry any weight is proof that your an idiot.


2 "so far"

and we don't know how many will never be exposed

could be 100's

WHTIE

Q


And as the Republican pathological extremists all know... total lack of evidence is proof of a conspiracy.

Better start working on your next fake news thread...

edit on 24-1-2018 by spiritualzombie because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 04:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: spiritualzombie

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: hoss53
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

How stupid to think that "TWO" FBI people could possible have any effect on a presidential election. They were simply expressing their opinion. To think that text messages between two people could possible carry any weight is proof that your an idiot.


2 "so far"

and we don't know how many will never be exposed

could be 100's

WHTIE

Q


And as the Republican pathological extremists all know... total lack of evidence is proof of a conspiracy.

Better start working on your next fake news thread...





posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 05:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: hoss53
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

How stupid to think that "TWO" FBI people could possible have any effect on a presidential election. They were simply expressing their opinion. To think that text messages between two people could possible carry any weight is proof that your an idiot.

two people very high in a very important investigation how stupid are you



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 09:30 PM
link   
1.24.2018

WOW... AG Sessions wasn't kidding. The Department of Justice jumped right on this, and are already "recovering" the 50,000 missing text messages.

Skip to 6min18sec for the late breaking announcement.



new topics

top topics



 
109
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join