It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BREAKING: Sessions makes HUGE announcement on FBI text messages

page: 5
109
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 10:08 AM
link   
twitter.com...


Anti-Trumpers, explain this or admit you've been bamboozled and start seeking the truth, not burying your heads in BS talking points and deflections
You can't see this earth-shattering data and still continue to somehow believe you're on the right side/winning team. History will be written by the victor, and I assure you it will be Trump come hell or high water. You'll want to be on the right side of history, I assume.

..and I want an apology from each and every single person who jeered the idea of a "deep state." If you need more evidence, look at the fact 50,000 mandatory-retain texts are now missing. Just as 30,000+ Clinton emails are missing. Just as these same "'agents'" were so deeply involved with Clinton/her criminal investigation.

Heads must roll over this. Strozok and Page should be eyeballs deep on their backs under a water-drenched shirt at this very moment in some pro-Trump agency black site, the interrogation revealing ever last detail of their treasonous plot. Enhanced interrogation must be used to elicit truthful responses from these criminals. Come on Mr. President, do what needs to be done. Fingers are crossed here, anyhow.
edit on 1/23/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 10:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Wayfarer

Those 50,000 text messages ....


You're already wrong. You've been mislead for the purpose of propaganda. There were not 50k text messages between the 2 agents....



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 10:18 AM
link   
a reply to: six67seven

Hey man, whatever makes yourself feel better. I'm content to wait and see the circus when Mueller's findings are released. You're the one trying to convince yourself that its a nothingburger (which insinuates that subconsciously you're worried it isn't).



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 10:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Wayfarer

Those 50,000 text messages ....


You're already wrong. You've been mislead for the purpose of propaganda. There were not 50k text messages between the 2 agents....


I think there are 50,000 missing that point to the "Secret Society"?



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 10:26 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

How does that work? Did they 'divine' that the 5 months of missing texts contained reference to 'secret societies' without reading them?



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 10:35 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Secret society=deep state

Kindly get a clue. The "die on this sword" mentality some on the left-show is truly inebriating.

Your entire position on the matter has been outed as a lie. Disinformation is being exposed by the hour and a very real and obvious plot to damage the President is now being realized through physical and material evidence (unlike anything your side has put forth to back up its accusations)

This whole dirty and disgusting plot is coming down, and is increasingly being exposed in a very public way.

For example, I thought you all claimed the Republicans would fight releasing the memo and its supporting documentation? Wrong. They're fighting to release it. It is Democrats who are fighting the release of additional information and release of the memo itself.



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 10:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer

No, just read it in the content which wasn't deleted. Thankfully, the AG is fighting-angry over this. Equally thankful for the myriad of ways nothing is ever truly deleted.

Maybe Trump/DOJ should offer 10-20 million dollars to anyone that "finds" those missing messages. Like Wikileaks is offering 1 million for The Memo.
edit on 1/23/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 10:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Wayfarer

Those 50,000 text messages ....


You're already wrong. You've been mislead for the purpose of propaganda. There were not 50k text messages between the 2 agents....

There were 50,000 texts between the two.
Politico


“In one of the biggest stories in a long time, the FBI says it is now missing five months worth of lovers Strzok - Page texts, perhaps 50,000, all in prime time. Wow!” Trump wrote online. His tweet appeared to confuse the number of missing texts, which is unknown, with the overall 50,000 texts between FBI agent Peter Strzok and bureau lawyer Lisa Page that were discovered on Justice Department servers.

The number that are missing is unknown to investigators.
edit on b000000312018-01-23T10:49:06-06:0010America/ChicagoTue, 23 Jan 2018 10:49:06 -06001000000018 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 10:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Wayfarer

Those 50,000 text messages ....


You're already wrong. You've been mislead for the purpose of propaganda. There were not 50k text messages between the 2 agents....

There were 50,000 texts between the two.
Politico
The number that are missing is unknown to investigators.


We've seen some of the incriminating texts from well before the election, what's missing is from a period of time AFTER The election.




posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 10:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: ausername

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Wayfarer

Those 50,000 text messages ....


You're already wrong. You've been mislead for the purpose of propaganda. There were not 50k text messages between the 2 agents....

There were 50,000 texts between the two.
Politico
The number that are missing is unknown to investigators.


We've seen some of the incriminating texts from well before the election, what's missing is from a period of time AFTER The election.


Yes... where they were implementing their.... "insurance policy" whether that refers to the dossier.... or an assassination plot, we don't know. But it apparently was something worth hiding.



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 10:58 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

This is funny.

From Sessions own Assistant Attorney General:



In a cover letter accompanying the Friday delivery of the 384 pages of new text messages, Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd explained that technical issues with the FBI's retention software prevented the bureau from capturing messages sent between the two employees on their agency-issued phones from December 14, 2016 to May 17, 2017.
...
In the cover letter, Boyd writes that "misconfiguration issues related to rollouts, provisioning, and software upgrades that conflicted with the FBI's collection capabilities" prevented the bureau-issued Samsung 5 cellphones from capturing or storing text messages, and lays out a timeline of the dates when the two officials' phones stopped storing the messages, and when they received new devices without the technical problems.


So Sessions is going to investigate his Assistant AG?

Doesn't sound like an FBI issue to me.

Note, this also means that anyone in government issued a Samsung 5 in the roll-out does not have their text messages stored in government servers, archives etc. from that roll-out until whenever they got the Samsung 7 upgrade.



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 11:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: ausername

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Wayfarer

Those 50,000 text messages ....


You're already wrong. You've been mislead for the purpose of propaganda. There were not 50k text messages between the 2 agents....

There were 50,000 texts between the two.
Politico
The number that are missing is unknown to investigators.


We've seen some of the incriminating texts from well before the election, what's missing is from a period of time AFTER The election.


Yes... where they were implementing their.... "insurance policy" whether that refers to the dossier.... or an assassination plot, we don't know. But it apparently was something worth hiding.


There was no "Insurance Policy".
That is paranoid speculation based on innocuous texts.

I haven't seen anyone prove otherwise.



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 11:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: ausername

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Wayfarer

Those 50,000 text messages ....


You're already wrong. You've been mislead for the purpose of propaganda. There were not 50k text messages between the 2 agents....

There were 50,000 texts between the two.
Politico
The number that are missing is unknown to investigators.


We've seen some of the incriminating texts from well before the election, what's missing is from a period of time AFTER The election.


Yes... where they were implementing their.... "insurance policy" whether that refers to the dossier.... or an assassination plot, we don't know. But it apparently was something worth hiding.


There was no "Insurance Policy".
That is paranoid speculation based on innocuous texts.

I haven't seen anyone prove otherwise.

He lost his job with Mueller over those 'innocuous' texts.



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 11:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: ausername

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Wayfarer

Those 50,000 text messages ....


You're already wrong. You've been mislead for the purpose of propaganda. There were not 50k text messages between the 2 agents....

There were 50,000 texts between the two.
Politico
The number that are missing is unknown to investigators.


We've seen some of the incriminating texts from well before the election, what's missing is from a period of time AFTER The election.


Yes... where they were implementing their.... "insurance policy" whether that refers to the dossier.... or an assassination plot, we don't know. But it apparently was something worth hiding.


There was no "Insurance Policy".
That is paranoid speculation based on innocuous texts.

I haven't seen anyone prove otherwise.


hahaha the denial is strong with this one....





posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 11:18 AM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

I have. From the mouths of Page/Strozok themselves, when they mentioned their "insurance policy"

Insurance policy isn't double speak. In fact, words have consequences and what you say matters.

Obstruction charges, at a minimum. They should've taken requisite steps to ensure their data was being collected in accordance with applicable rules/laws. Ignorance is no excuse for breaking the law/breaking the rules.

Thankfully for us nothing is ever truly gone. NSA collection programs have all those messages, phone calls, emails, GPS locations and more. Foreign intelligence may have things on them as well, so who knows where they will come from.
edit on 1/23/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 11:19 AM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus


There was no "Insurance Policy".



In another text sent in August 2016, after the Clinton investigation closed, Strzok says, without explanation: "I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's office" -- an apparent reference to Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe -- "that there's no way he gets elected -- but I'm afraid we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40 . . . ." Page does not appear to have responded, according to records reviewed by CNN.


How Mueller's path was muddied in two weeks - CNN

Better let CNN know that they are publishing paranoid speculation.



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 11:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: ausername

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Wayfarer

Those 50,000 text messages ....


You're already wrong. You've been mislead for the purpose of propaganda. There were not 50k text messages between the 2 agents....

There were 50,000 texts between the two.
Politico
The number that are missing is unknown to investigators.


We've seen some of the incriminating texts from well before the election, what's missing is from a period of time AFTER The election.


Yes... where they were implementing their.... "insurance policy" whether that refers to the dossier.... or an assassination plot, we don't know. But it apparently was something worth hiding.


There was no "Insurance Policy".
That is paranoid speculation based on innocuous texts.

I haven't seen anyone prove otherwise.

He lost his job with Mueller over those 'innocuous' texts.


He lost his job for having an affair with a colleague.
If you watched the hearings and questioning you would know that it wasn't his political opinions that cost him his job.



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 11:29 AM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Right...and now without spin just pure text:


"I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's office"
"that there's no way he gets elected -- but I'm afraid we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40 . . . ."


The path was easily an electoral college discussion where people were speculating across the country that there was no "path" to trump winning.

The second Part could have easily been suggesting they take interview for jobs in the private sector or that they continue to gather the evolving evidence of team trump secretly meeting with Russians or any of a dozen reasons..

But you guys think assassination plot! Deep state conspiracy involving hundreds of people and dozens of agencies!

Nonsense.

This is a video of a balloon and you guys are screaming alien invasion.
I know it is politically convenient, but it is not objectively credible.


edit on 23-1-2018 by soberbacchus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 11:31 AM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

That was "without spin"?

Really?





posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 11:32 AM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

And the secret society is...?

By definition, this is the deep state.
edit on 1/23/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
109
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join