It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: kelbtalfenek
SEEEE!
Those damn activist judges are at it again.
Who voted this yahoo into office.
originally posted by: NobodiesNormal
a reply to: kelbtalfenek
this may be a stretch but.... if voice to skull technology really exists as the cia has insisted it does. then this is the sort of thing id expect it to be used for, sway judges, tamper with juries.
and all seemingly in an effort to hush up a human trafficking trial. what a coincidence considering the cia's exposed involvement in human trafficking...
originally posted by: MteWamp
Fortunately your honor, God's opinion is completely irrelevant in a court of law.
With your permission, Council would like to approach the bench....
originally posted by: kelbtalfenek
Wow, just wow...How is this even possible? The judge interferes with the jury and it's okay? God says what?
originally posted by: schuyler
originally posted by: kelbtalfenek
Wow, just wow...How is this even possible? The judge interferes with the jury and it's okay? God says what?
Relax. No, its not okay. Not only was it immediately reported, but the jury didn't pay any attention to the judge. There will undoubtedly be hearings and I wouldn't be surprised if the judge were cited in this case.
originally posted by: kelbtalfenek
originally posted by: schuyler
originally posted by: kelbtalfenek
Wow, just wow...How is this even possible? The judge interferes with the jury and it's okay? God says what?
Relax. No, its not okay. Not only was it immediately reported, but the jury didn't pay any attention to the judge. There will undoubtedly be hearings and I wouldn't be surprised if the judge were cited in this case.
I would expect more than just a citation, I would expect him to be held to the same legal restrictions of anyone with regards to jury tampering.