It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: Grambler
What next, placing people with russian heritage in internement camps?
Ouch; when we interned the Japanese Americans it was because we were at world war with the Japanese... And we now accept that was wrong.
When we McCarthyed the communists (or any one we wanted to be communists) it was because we were at cold war with the communists... And we now accept that was wrong.
Now we are going down that same road because ... because... we are at war ... with Donald Trump?
Man we are unhinged up in here.
No. We are not going down the same road.
It appears the verbiage used was in the process of being clarified and despite the title of the OP, and both sources used for the article, it does not apply to "anyone". It only applied to the specific request made in one case involving Charles Johnson.
I don't like Donald Trump as much as the next guy. But seriously we are coming unhinged over his election. A president is simply not THIS important; sure (s)he's important but we have plenty of other government institutions that provide checks and balances. If Donald Trump and his orange skin is really as bad as people think he is than we ride out the sunshower and elect someone better in 3 years. He really isn't worth the hisyeria.
I don't see how this has much to do with Trump.
It's a vague request from a committee and the lawyer, rightfully, worked to get further clarification. I'd like to see what that was, though.
Would we be having this conversation if Marco Rubio was the president? .... that's why it has to do with Trump's election.
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: introvert
Trump and friends did.
What did they do?
Ya'll are having a hard time pinning that one down.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: Grambler
What next, placing people with russian heritage in internement camps?
Ouch; when we interned the Japanese Americans it was because we were at world war with the Japanese... And we now accept that was wrong.
When we McCarthyed the communists (or any one we wanted to be communists) it was because we were at cold war with the communists... And we now accept that was wrong.
Now we are going down that same road because ... because... we are at war ... with Donald Trump?
Man we are unhinged up in here.
No. We are not going down the same road.
It appears the verbiage used was in the process of being clarified and despite the title of the OP, and both sources used for the article, it does not apply to "anyone". It only applied to the specific request made in one case involving Charles Johnson.
I don't like Donald Trump as much as the next guy. But seriously we are coming unhinged over his election. A president is simply not THIS important; sure (s)he's important but we have plenty of other government institutions that provide checks and balances. If Donald Trump and his orange skin is really as bad as people think he is than we ride out the sunshower and elect someone better in 3 years. He really isn't worth the hisyeria.
I don't see how this has much to do with Trump.
It's a vague request from a committee and the lawyer, rightfully, worked to get further clarification. I'd like to see what that was, though.
Would we be having this conversation if Marco Rubio was the president? .... that's why it has to do with Trump's election.
Rubio did not do the things Trump and friends did.
False equivalency.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Grambler
Perhaps we are just interpreting the email differently.
Suppose it depends on the intent behind using the phrase "may be".
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: Grambler
What next, placing people with russian heritage in internement camps?
Ouch; when we interned the Japanese Americans it was because we were at world war with the Japanese... And we now accept that was wrong.
When we McCarthyed the communists (or any one we wanted to be communists) it was because we were at cold war with the communists... And we now accept that was wrong.
Now we are going down that same road because ... because... we are at war ... with Donald Trump?
Man we are unhinged up in here.
No. We are not going down the same road.
It appears the verbiage used was in the process of being clarified and despite the title of the OP, and both sources used for the article, it does not apply to "anyone". It only applied to the specific request made in one case involving Charles Johnson.
I don't like Donald Trump as much as the next guy. But seriously we are coming unhinged over his election. A president is simply not THIS important; sure (s)he's important but we have plenty of other government institutions that provide checks and balances. If Donald Trump and his orange skin is really as bad as people think he is than we ride out the sunshower and elect someone better in 3 years. He really isn't worth the hisyeria.
I don't see how this has much to do with Trump.
It's a vague request from a committee and the lawyer, rightfully, worked to get further clarification. I'd like to see what that was, though.
Would we be having this conversation if Marco Rubio was the president? .... that's why it has to do with Trump's election.
Rubio did not do the things Trump and friends did.
False equivalency.
Trump and friends are "alleged" to have done.
Thank you for proving my unhinged point.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: Grambler
What next, placing people with russian heritage in internement camps?
Ouch; when we interned the Japanese Americans it was because we were at world war with the Japanese... And we now accept that was wrong.
When we McCarthyed the communists (or any one we wanted to be communists) it was because we were at cold war with the communists... And we now accept that was wrong.
Now we are going down that same road because ... because... we are at war ... with Donald Trump?
Man we are unhinged up in here.
No. We are not going down the same road.
It appears the verbiage used was in the process of being clarified and despite the title of the OP, and both sources used for the article, it does not apply to "anyone". It only applied to the specific request made in one case involving Charles Johnson.
I don't like Donald Trump as much as the next guy. But seriously we are coming unhinged over his election. A president is simply not THIS important; sure (s)he's important but we have plenty of other government institutions that provide checks and balances. If Donald Trump and his orange skin is really as bad as people think he is than we ride out the sunshower and elect someone better in 3 years. He really isn't worth the hisyeria.
I don't see how this has much to do with Trump.
It's a vague request from a committee and the lawyer, rightfully, worked to get further clarification. I'd like to see what that was, though.
Would we be having this conversation if Marco Rubio was the president? .... that's why it has to do with Trump's election.
Rubio did not do the things Trump and friends did.
False equivalency.
Trump and friends are "alleged" to have done.
Thank you for proving my unhinged point.
What are Rubio and friends "alleged" to have done?
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: Grambler
What next, placing people with russian heritage in internement camps?
Ouch; when we interned the Japanese Americans it was because we were at world war with the Japanese... And we now accept that was wrong.
When we McCarthyed the communists (or any one we wanted to be communists) it was because we were at cold war with the communists... And we now accept that was wrong.
Now we are going down that same road because ... because... we are at war ... with Donald Trump?
Man we are unhinged up in here.
No. We are not going down the same road.
It appears the verbiage used was in the process of being clarified and despite the title of the OP, and both sources used for the article, it does not apply to "anyone". It only applied to the specific request made in one case involving Charles Johnson.
I don't like Donald Trump as much as the next guy. But seriously we are coming unhinged over his election. A president is simply not THIS important; sure (s)he's important but we have plenty of other government institutions that provide checks and balances. If Donald Trump and his orange skin is really as bad as people think he is than we ride out the sunshower and elect someone better in 3 years. He really isn't worth the hisyeria.
I don't see how this has much to do with Trump.
It's a vague request from a committee and the lawyer, rightfully, worked to get further clarification. I'd like to see what that was, though.
Would we be having this conversation if Marco Rubio was the president? .... that's why it has to do with Trump's election.
Rubio did not do the things Trump and friends did.
False equivalency.
Trump and friends are "alleged" to have done.
Thank you for proving my unhinged point.
What are Rubio and friends "alleged" to have done?
So you are in agreement if this email is saying what I think it says, it would be very bad.
Notice she is saying they discussed this already.
In fact, at the bottom when the woman says "With that clarification that we previously discussed" she is saying this is the clarification of the term russian persons, as we already discussed, now will you submit documents and be interviewed.
This is appaling.
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: Grambler
What next, placing people with russian heritage in internement camps?
Ouch; when we interned the Japanese Americans it was because we were at world war with the Japanese... And we now accept that was wrong.
When we McCarthyed the communists (or any one we wanted to be communists) it was because we were at cold war with the communists... And we now accept that was wrong.
Now we are going down that same road because ... because... we are at war ... with Donald Trump?
Man we are unhinged up in here.
No. We are not going down the same road.
It appears the verbiage used was in the process of being clarified and despite the title of the OP, and both sources used for the article, it does not apply to "anyone". It only applied to the specific request made in one case involving Charles Johnson.
I don't like Donald Trump as much as the next guy. But seriously we are coming unhinged over his election. A president is simply not THIS important; sure (s)he's important but we have plenty of other government institutions that provide checks and balances. If Donald Trump and his orange skin is really as bad as people think he is than we ride out the sunshower and elect someone better in 3 years. He really isn't worth the hisyeria.
I don't see how this has much to do with Trump.
It's a vague request from a committee and the lawyer, rightfully, worked to get further clarification. I'd like to see what that was, though.
Would we be having this conversation if Marco Rubio was the president? .... that's why it has to do with Trump's election.
Rubio did not do the things Trump and friends did.
False equivalency.
Trump and friends are "alleged" to have done.
Thank you for proving my unhinged point.
What are Rubio and friends "alleged" to have done?
They where alleged to having been little I think.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Grambler
If you read the email, it seems she is referring to a clarification that was previously discussed. Not that what she said in the email IS the clarification. She is admitting the request "could be" read a certain way and therefore the need for clarification.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: Grambler
What next, placing people with russian heritage in internement camps?
Ouch; when we interned the Japanese Americans it was because we were at world war with the Japanese... And we now accept that was wrong.
When we McCarthyed the communists (or any one we wanted to be communists) it was because we were at cold war with the communists... And we now accept that was wrong.
Now we are going down that same road because ... because... we are at war ... with Donald Trump?
Man we are unhinged up in here.
No. We are not going down the same road.
It appears the verbiage used was in the process of being clarified and despite the title of the OP, and both sources used for the article, it does not apply to "anyone". It only applied to the specific request made in one case involving Charles Johnson.
I don't like Donald Trump as much as the next guy. But seriously we are coming unhinged over his election. A president is simply not THIS important; sure (s)he's important but we have plenty of other government institutions that provide checks and balances. If Donald Trump and his orange skin is really as bad as people think he is than we ride out the sunshower and elect someone better in 3 years. He really isn't worth the hisyeria.
I don't see how this has much to do with Trump.
It's a vague request from a committee and the lawyer, rightfully, worked to get further clarification. I'd like to see what that was, though.
Would we be having this conversation if Marco Rubio was the president? .... that's why it has to do with Trump's election.
Rubio did not do the things Trump and friends did.
False equivalency.
Trump and friends are "alleged" to have done.
Thank you for proving my unhinged point.
What are Rubio and friends "alleged" to have done?
They where alleged to having been little I think.
Thanks for proving my point.
Johnson is frequently described as an internet troll. He periodically makes false and unsubstantiated claims. Johnson is part of the alt-right movement in the United States.
Johnson was involved in the creation of a Daily Caller story that accused U.S. Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ) of soliciting underage prostitutes in the Dominican Republic. A criminal investigation of the case found no evidence, and the women making the allegations later admitted they had been paid by a local lawyer to make the claims.
In December 2014, Rolling Stone columnist Sabrina Erdely published an article entitled "A Rape on Campus" about the alleged gang rape of a University of Virginia (UVA) student named "Jackie" in 2012 at the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity house at UVA. The article was later found to be fabricated. Johnson publicly identified a woman he thought was Jackie, which has since been proven to be false.
In September 2016, Johnson published a story on GotNews about a soon-to-launch anti-Trump website called PutinTrump.org.[28] WikiLeaks forwarded the story in private to Donald Trump Jr. before publicly tweeting it. Business Insider speculated that Johnson's story in September on GotNews may have marked the beginning of Donald Trump Jr.'s—and the Trump campaign's—back-channel contact with Julian Assange and Wikileaks. (Johnson wrote after Wikileaks tweeted the story, "About 2 hours after our original article, Julian Assange's WikiLeaks repeated our discoveries. Guess which big leaks organization reads GotNews & WeSearchr on the downlow! Come on Julian, let's work together. WikiLeaks & WeSearchr is a match made in heaven. We can take down Hillary together.")
Relevant materials, the letter went on, would include any records of interactions Johnson had with “Russian persons” who were involved in some capacity in the 2016 U.S. elections.
So are you of "Russian descent" and have any level of interest in US politics - perhaps you occasionally read the newspaper, or have ever called in to a radio talk show? You could be subpoenaed for merely existing on American soil!
Three Dominican women were paid to lie about having sex for money with Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and a close friend, Dominican police said Monday, citing statements from the women and other evidence. At a news conference in the Dominican Republic, National Police spokesman Maximo Baez Aybar said authorities had determined that the women were paid hundreds of dollars by a local lawyer to make the false claims in videotaped interviews. The women said the lawyer coached them on what to say in their recorded statements, taped in a Dominican shopping mall in La Romana province.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Is there even one Russian member in this site. I got to wondering about that a while ago. Have never noticed one. I supposed they'd be afraid to speak about it. See just about everyone else talk about their decadency at some point. And then I've seen threads straight calling out pre-emptively demonizing the very idea of a Russian being able to post here. What kind of bigoted 'racism' is that, what kind of diversity, now?