It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Martin75
That picture is the lead engine sitting on the expressway.
It hit something major before getting there just look at the front of it.
Strange unless it did a 360 and ended upright?? Naah
12 of the 13 cars came off the track. To me that took a huge force!
This is one of the strangest derailments I've seen. Trains went in every
direction instead of "stacking" and the last one stays on the tracks????
originally posted by: Martin75
originally posted by: Devino
This is not a new line nor a new train. It was the first time Cascade used the interstate 5 route.
originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: xuenchen
Did I hear correctly that this is a new line and this was the first run? Did they not do a trial run with an empty train?
This is awful! My thoughts and prayers are with everyone involved.
A notice on the Washington State Department of Transportation's website before the crash said that Monday was the first day for Amtrak's Cascades train to use the route along I-5.
Thank you for the clarification. That makes more sense.
So has a train ever driven this route that fast? Surely they did test runs.
originally posted by: mikell
Yup now they are saying 80 in a 30 OOPS!!
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: face23785
I wonder if 97% of the engineers doing the computer models agreed?
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Martin75
originally posted by: Devino
This is not a new line nor a new train. It was the first time Cascade used the interstate 5 route.
originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: xuenchen
Did I hear correctly that this is a new line and this was the first run? Did they not do a trial run with an empty train?
This is awful! My thoughts and prayers are with everyone involved.
A notice on the Washington State Department of Transportation's website before the crash said that Monday was the first day for Amtrak's Cascades train to use the route along I-5.
Thank you for the clarification. That makes more sense.
So has a train ever driven this route that fast? Surely they did test runs.
One of the women on Fox Business just said that they never did any real-world tests to see if this particular train could handle that track at that speed. All they did was computer models. The models said it would be safe.
If models can't even get something as basic as this right, how the # can we trust them on something as complex as climate?
originally posted by: proteus33
a reply to: GuidedKill
portable derailers don't always work they tried stopping a runaway freight train years ago and it didn't do diddly and vehicles on track would need to be extremely tough other wise trains mass and velocity would obliterate it.
originally posted by: research100
a reply to: face23785
www.dailymail.co.uk...
the engineer had an employee in training in the cab...not saying he was distracted but they always look at these things to rule in or out.... the engineer was bleeding from the head and both eyes swollen shut...the article says the train was going 50 miles over the speed limit
2 train aficionados were killed and a reporter got off at the stop before the derailment
the event data recorder says the train was doing 80 in a 30 mph area,,,positive train control that can slow or stop a train is not used at this part of the track
Ironically, City Mayor Mike Courts and his team, along with numerous agencies, were conducting a training session for a ‘mass casualty incident’ closeby when the Amtrak Cascades derailment occurred killing six and sending over 70 others to the hospital.
According to the report, ‘many agencies’ were in the area planning their day for the exact same scenario as it actually played out in real-time.
originally posted by: NobodiesNormal
a passenger described the experience,
www.washingtonpost.com...
“All of a sudden, we felt this rocking and creaking noise, and then all of a sudden it felt like we were heading down a hill, and the next thing that we know we’re being slammed into the front of our seats and the windows are breaking,” Chris Karnes, a passenger
this tells me the train did not collide with a vehicle, as some here are speculating,
from what the witness says it sounds like something made the train derail somewhat smoothly, like something wrong with the track,
originally posted by: markymint
RIP. Looks pretty straightforward. Train takes an awkward curve at too high a speed, front engine rolls down ditch into road, some carriages follow whilst others buckle against the bridge.
originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
Mayor warned about new Amtrak line before derailment
The mayor of a city near the scene of Monday’s deadly train crash in Washington state warned earlier this month that the start of high-speed service was bound to end in disaster.
During a Dec. 4 meeting of the Lakewood City Council, Mayor Don Anderson blasted plans by the Washington State Department of Transportation to let Amtrak trains travel through the city at up to 79 mph without first installing overpasses or other means of keeping motor vehicles and pedestrians away from the tracks.
“Come back when there is that accident, and try to justify not putting in those safety enhancements, or you can go back now and advocate for the money to do it, because this project was never needed and endangers our citizens,” Anderson said, according to video posted online by KOMO Radio.
Hmmm... what should we make of that?