It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Further more on Flynn not disclosing for lobbying.
You and I both know that this is a crime that is committed all of the time, and almost never charged.
Now I am sure we both agree that it should be charged more often.
But to act like now Muellers team and the FBI is taking this very seriously and its a huge deal ignores that they have let pretty much every slide on this.
Remember when the Podesta group got caught failing to register properly? They just said "My bad!" and went back a retroactively filled out the paperwork.
Almost like the investigators didnt want to charge hillarys team with anything before the election.
originally posted by: Grambler
We all know who strzok is by now, the FBI agent and Mueller team member who was seemingly involved in every crucial point of the Hillary and Trump investigations.
The same guy who was apparently texting anti trump, pro Hillary messages to his mistress who worked in the FBI.
Many people have said just because he was biased doesn't mean it affected his job.
Well lets look at this closely.
Strzok interviewed Flynn (in what has been characterized as a sort of ambush without Flynns lawyer there) and ultimately Flynn was charged with lying to the FBI.
Now as almost all of the left leaning members here have told us all, lying to the FBI is a big deal. I agree.
So fine, hes charged.
Now Strzok also interviewed Hillary, and people like Huma and Mills in the email investigation.
Lets see how that went.
The FBI agent who was fired from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation team for sending anti-Donald Trump text messages conducted the interviews with two Hillary Clinton aides accused of giving false statements about what they knew of the former secretary of state’s private email server.
Neither of the Clinton associates, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, faced legal consequences for their misleading statements, which they made in interviews last year with former FBI section chief Peter Strzok.
Lets look into it in detail shall we?
First lets see what Huma and Mills said.
A review of those documents conducted by The Daily Caller shows that Mills and Abedin told Strzok and Laufman that they were not aware of Clinton’s server until after she left the State Department.
“Mills did not learn Clinton was using a private server until after Clinton’s [Department of State] tenure,” reads notes from Mills’ April 9, 2016 interview. “Mills stated she was not even sure she knew what a server was at the time.”
Abedin also denied knowing about Clinton’s server until leaving the State Department in 2013.
“Abedin did not know that Clinton had a private server until about a year and a half ago when it became public knowledge,” the summary of Strzok’s interview with Abedin states.
Ok, so Huma didnt know about the server until the public did. Mills didn't know of Hillary's server, and in fact claims she didn't even know what a server was.
Pretty cut and dry.
So lets see if that's true.
But undercutting those denials are email exchanges in which both Mills and Abedin either directly discussed or were involved in discussing Clinton’s server.
“hrc email coming back — is server okay?” Mills asked in a Feb. 27, 2010 email to Abedin and Justin Cooper, a longtime aide to Bill Clinton who helped set up the Clinton server.
“Ur funny. We are on the same server,” Cooper replied.
Wait what is that? Mills was discussing this server in 2010 in emails?
Say it ain't so!!! I thought she didn't even know what a server was?
Mills and Abedin were also involved in an Aug. 30, 2011 exchange in which State Department official Stephen Mull mentioned that Clinton’s “email server is down.”
And in a Jan. 9, 2011 email exchange, Cooper told Abedin that Clinton’s server had been malfunctioning because “someone was trying to hack us.”
“Had to shut down the server,” wrote Cooper, who told the FBI in his interviews that he discussed Clinton’s server with Abedin in 2009, when it was being set up.
Huma having emails discussing the server in 2009 and 2011?
It cant be!!!!!
So we have absolute proof from Strzoks notes and released emails that Mills and Huma absolutely lied to the FBI.
Yet no charges at all.
Where are all of those on the left screaming about how lying to the FBI is a huge deal?
Now I know, some will say "Fine arrest them"
Well they should be arrested, I agree.
But more than that, what does this tell us about Strzok, Comey, and the FBI?
Strzok does the interviews, charges flynn with lying, and lets Huma and mills off of the hook.
And he is also texting pro hillary, anti trump messages.
This double standard is appalling, and shows the FBI has a bias toward Hillary and her team, and against trump.
This is disgusting and must be investigated to the fullest extent.
We are fast approaching tyranny. While some lament Russian facebook posts, the most powerful intel agency in the world is being used as a political hit machine to attack an elected President, and to let another candidates team off of the hook.
Every single person, Trump hater or not, should be frightened and disgusted by this, and call for immediate investigations and transparency.
originally posted by: Grambler
Looks like some congress members are finally calling for an investigation into the FBI's handling of these cases.
Lets see where it goes.