It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Pascal's wager? As a reason to believe?
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: BStoltman
There either is a God or there isn't . Better to believe and find out there is none then to not believe and find out there is .At least working from that premise I have come to believe more and more that there is .
Another version of pascal's wager. Do you believe in cthulu? Some people think that it would be better to believe in Cthulhu rather than take the chance.
originally posted by: djz3ro
I had an interesting discussion with a chap from Ghana once about religion and he believes, as I do now, that people who believe in God do so because the need to and the reason so many in his country do is down to the hardships they face.
I remember my dear Grandma once said to me "one day something will happen in your life that will prove the existence of God beyond a shadow of a doubt." (my Mum dying at the age of 46 proved the opposite but that's for another time). Now I realise she meant that something may happen in my life that will mean I may need a belief in God to get through it.
No thanks what? Not interested in conversation? Or listening to ideas you've never heard?
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: Woodcarver
No thanks .
Well I certainly don't know that. And I am a man, so your proposition is patently false.
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: BStoltman
"Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God."
Cicero
I think God is a universal concept that all men 'know', however, the form and influence that God has are up to the individual seeker and no one should tell another how and what to believe.
You don't have to explain
he is asking..inviting
Sometimes if you don't want to participate in a discussion, maybe just don't post.
are you not interested in whether your beliefs are real or not? This may be the root of the problem. Some people are just happy believing in things that make them happy. Some of us are far more concerned with finding out whether their beliefs are valid or not, True or not.
originally posted by: DrumsRfun
a reply to: BStoltman
Why would anyone have to explain or justify what they think to anyone??
Its a personal journey...live and let live no matter what you believe or don't believe.
Sometimes the most shallow river is the one that makes the most noise.
BOOM!!!
What does spooky mean and why did you claim something to exist in a text that was not there ? We have unfinished conversations ,so to start another and not finish it like the others seems like a unfruitful adventure at least with you . have a good day
No thanks what? Not interested in conversation? Or listening to ideas you've never heard?
These conversations are not about forcing anything on anybody it is about examining ideas and the data that leads people to hold them.
originally posted by: rhynouk
My religious beliefs are changing all the time. Being taught it at a very young age in school. Going to church every so often. Almost programmed to believe without any doubt about it whatsoever.
I have never read the bible, just a drone, programmed to believe. Until I got older.
I had a friend years ago who wouldn't use a red pen because she said red was the colour of the devil. She didn't believe in god or religion one bit. I then asked why did she get married under the eyes of god in a church if she didn't believe. She couldn't answer that and changed the subject.
People are free to believe in whatever they like. I would never force my own beliefs on others. I just always find it amazing that people take this book so seriously. People dedicate their whole lives to it's teachings, without any real question of it's origins.
are you not interested in whether your beliefs are real or not
I guess you were referring to our previous conversation about Einstein. He did not like the idea that two particles could be joined together in such a way that it would appear that they could reflect their states in each other. This idea goes against his theory of relativity, as it would appear that these two particles can communicate at speeds greater than the speed of light. When he discussed this with his peers, he stated that he does not believe in spooky action at a distance. By spooky, he means that to him, it seemed like his colleagues were advocating that this was a non-physical reaction. Spooky as in not a natural explanation. He was right.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: Woodcarver
What does spooky mean and why did you claim something to exist in a text that was not there ? We have unfinished conversations ,so to start another and not finish it like the others seems like a unfruitful adventure at least with you . have a good day
No thanks what? Not interested in conversation? Or listening to ideas you've never heard?
how do you know if something is real or not? Because other people believe it is? Or by testable and repeatable outcomes?
originally posted by: DrumsRfun
a reply to: Woodcarver
are you not interested in whether your beliefs are real or not
Who makes it real...other people?