Did NASA Coverup The Sun Releasing Dark Matter On August 23rd?

a reply to: chr0naut
Dark matter (if it exists) exerts gravity just like ordinary matter does. If the vast amounts of it were released from the Sun, the Sun would lose mass, which would be noticeable and measurable.

As for what would happen if dark matter collided with Earth or any other "normal" mass, now that's a whole different topic.

originally posted by: wildespace
a reply to: chr0naut
Dark matter (if it exists) exerts gravity just like ordinary matter does. If the vast amounts of it were released from the Sun, the Sun would lose mass, which would be noticeable and measurable.

As for what would happen if dark matter collided with Earth or any other "normal" mass, now that's a whole different topic.

As far as we know, the Sun should not include vast amounts of gravitationally attracted dark matter within it because we would detect it by irregularities when compared to the calculations of the orbital mechanics of the planets.

The caveat may be that dark matter is evenly distributed throughout the solar system and therefore its 'gravity' pulls equally in all directions, cancelling any net effect. However, this would mean that dark matter, while having a gravitational effect by the way its mass curves spacetime, is itself somehow unaffected by spacetime curvature.

This leads to the possibility that dark matter is extremely low mass by volume and is perhaps packed nearly as densely as it can go, throughout all spacetime, simulating an homogenous 'aether'. This might indicate that the Michaelson-Morley type experiments have failed to show an aether due to their small physical scale.

SOHO had just done it's bi-annual 180* rotation & the camera was still adjusting, usually taking about 12 hours, to the new position of the occultus disk.

originally posted by: MuthaShipMutha
SOHO had just done it's bi-annual 180* rotation & the camera was still adjusting, usually taking about 12 hours, to the new position of the occultus disk.

Thank you for that! I saw this before the edit (on the 23rd) and wondered what the heck I saw, it looked like the arm flipped and that dark zone was wow. Then about a day later when I looked, that was edited out. But it still looks like some darker areas still, just not as dramatic. Glad that mystery is sorted!

a reply to: MuonToGluon

Thats the last time i read Wired Magazine.

regarding the title of the thread, no. Because you found the same data wired did (lol). If there was a cover up, you would not have found any data.

And anyway, nope, no dark matter expulsion's

originally posted by: MasterAtArms
regarding the title of the thread, no. Because you found the same data wired did (lol). If there was a cover up, you would not have found any data.

And anyway, nope, no dark matter expulsion's

it's very much like the 'banned from youtube' videos on youtube itself.

originally posted by: Sapphire
a reply to: MuonToGluon

Thats the last time i read Wired Magazine.

There's no need to give up on "Wired". Wired did not say anything that was inherently incorrect, and it did NOT say that the SOHO images in the OP's video showed dark matter.

The wired article about the potential for dark matter to be within the Sun is still a possibility without the idea from the OP's video that SOHO took images of that dark matter.

Dark matter might exist and be associated with our Sun, but that would not be visible in images of the Sun. Dark matter cannot be seen. It is not "dark", but it is invisible (it's MORE than just invisible; it is undetectable in any manner except for its gravitational effects).