It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amelia
Do you hear yourself????
Why can't you accept that we are in the year 2005 now? Times have changed!
would he spit on him like he was a whore?
NO, he would understand and send him love....that is what a true christian have to accept.
A true christian like you must forgive and respect.
It does not follow. Sex is a sin for everyone in the RCC, except married couples. For the above to be true, single catholics would have to be on the verge of pedophilia. Also, why would an abstinent preist choose to molest a child, rather bang a female parishoner, or whore?
Originally posted by Zabilgy
it's because THE PRIEST IS A PEDOPHILE.
but some of the homosexuals that are unhappy being gay, think they may get some sort of cure by becoming priests.
Regarding Cardinal Law...he's a scum bag and he retired so he wouldn't have to face the inferno that was about to engulf him.
The Pope is ultimately responsible for all the abuses in the Catholic church
Originally posted by Zabilgy
Jesus wasn't married, and this rule has been instituted immediately when he formed the Church - you should read the Bible carefully.
I should read the bible more carefully? Jesus, a Jew, formed the Catholic church? Where does it say that in the bible? That's the most ridiculous thing I ever heard. So every other Christian on this planet (the non-Catholics) are worshipping Jesus incorrectly because they are not Catholic? I should read the bible? YOU SHOULD READ THE BIBLE!
Firstly, calm down, sonny, change your tone.
Originally posted by Zabilgy
Firstly, calm down, sonny, change your tone.
First of all, don't call me sonny and don't tell me to change my tone. What am I one of your children? Secondly in all that gibberish you wrote, where does it say that the church they created was called the CATHOLIC CHURCH? It was a Christian church yes, but where does the word Catholic show up? WHERE??
, WHERE IS THAT IN THE BIBLE??? IT ISN'T!!
Originally posted by AtheiX
Jesus wasn't married, and this rule has been instituted immediately when he formed the Church - you should read the Bible carefully.
The rule has been institued to insure that priests handle ONLY affairs of the Holy Mass, evangelization etc. And it works. If there wasn't this rule, it wouldn't be like this and it still even is difficult sometimes, like with Priest Henry Jankowski or Priest Tadeusz Rydzyk, who care mostly for MONEY, so the Church will even have to cope with that as well. Also, the priests have to resign from something - it ws decided that they will resign from this.
This (I mean your idea) is one of the worst ideas I have ever heard, not only from the ethical point of view.
[edit on 9-2-2005 by AtheiX]
If marriage here on Earth is so important, why Jesus Christ was not married?
Why do you believe that Jesus was never married? The Bible does not teach that the Lord was never married, but simply makes no explicit mention of the subject. There are two possible reasons for this deficiency:
(1) The scriptures are not meant to convey all truth, but only those select things that are necessary for our salvation. For example, the Bible teaches the following:
"And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book: But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name." (John 20:30-1)
Whether Jesus was married or not has nothing to do with our personal salvation and therefore is not authoritatively covered in the text.
(2) It is clear to Latter-day Saints that the Bible is missing many important truths which were removed during the beginnings of the apostasy. The Prophet Joseph Smith noted:
"I believe the Bible as it read when it came from the pen of the original writers. Ignorant translators, careless transcribers, or designing and corrupt priests have committed many errors." (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, Section Six 1843–44, p.327)
These truths were removed in an attempt to make the text match the theology, instead of letting the text define the theology. In other words, since the idea of Jesus being married was so repugnant to some people, especially those indoctrinated by the immaterialism of Greek philosophy, they eliminated any clear references in the scriptures indicating that Jesus was married. (See The Holy Bible home page)
It doesn't say to start a new religion called 'christianity' in the bible, or to use a rounded wafer, hold masses, wear crosses or say any prayer in particular either.
Originally posted by Zabilgy
This seems right out of the dark ages.
But instead, their sexual frustrations come
out in very bad ways such as molesting and
raping altar boys.
Originally posted by Zabilgy
where does it say that the church they created was called the CATHOLIC
CHURCH? It was a Christian church yes, but where does the word Catholic
show up? WHERE??
about that garbage that having priests be unmarried leads them to become gay pedophiles. My God ... have you ever
cracked a psychology book? Unmarried men don't just become gay.
They don't just become gay pedophiles. That's so ignorant I don't
even know where to start.
Having priests not marry is a discipline of the church that can change
as those in charge see fit. At this time in church history, those in charge
of the church feel it is not in the best interest of the Catholic church to
allow priests to marry.
BOB ABERNETHY (anchor): Last year, just over 500 men were ordained as Catholic priests in this country -- about half the number ordained in 1965. One of the reasons for the current shortage of priests is that so many men have left the priesthood to get married. Because of that, some have suggested that the Church consider making priestly celibacy optional.
To average Catholics, it may be hard to imagine their priest with a wife and children. But, to a limited extent, it is already happening. Judy Valente reports.
JUDY VALENTE: Most Catholics have never seen this before: their priest, at Mass, wearing a wedding ring -- with his wife and children looking on from the pews.
His name is David Medow. And until 10 days earlier, he had been a Lutheran minister.
(to Father Medow): Did you grow up with much knowledge of Catholics?
FATHER DAVID MEDOW (St. Mary Immaculate Church, Illinois): I grew up with no knowledge of Catholics, other than seeing these exotic blue-dressed figures walking in the streets of my neighborhood in Chicago going to a local parochial school.
VALENTE: Before he could be ordained, Medow had to spend two and a half years in Catholic seminary. He represents a small but potentially significant phenomenon in the Catholic Church: the ordination of former Protestant clergymen -- who are married.
FATHER MEDOW: I loved being Lutheran. But God has called me into this community, and I really had grown into being Catholic in many ways. Not only spiritually but theologically.
VALENTE: (to Mrs. Jane Medow): How have you been welcomed in the parish?
MS. JANE MEDOW (Wife): People have been very accepting, they're very excited about David coming here.
HANNAH MEDOW (Daughter): A lot of kids have come up to me and gone, like, "Whoa, your Dad's gonna be a priest." And they were really surprised.
More
Originally posted by Zabilgy
Dah...when did I say this?
You aren't very bright ...
Originally posted by Zabilgy
having priests not marry is a "discipline?"....what about the 1000's of
priests that seemed to have failed that discipline and have molested
altar boys
Seriously, why do YOU feel it's not in the Catholic Churches best interest?
Ezekiel 44:22 - 'Neither shall they take for their wives a widow, nor her that is put away: but they shall take maidens of the seed of the house of Israel, or a widow that had a priest before.'
Originally posted by Zabilgy
All the religions use the same basic bible, so why is it the Catholics are the only ones that deduced that their holy men and women are supposed to be celebate?
Why do all the other religions that read the same bible allow their leaders to marry??
That was the point of this thread! And it's funny, but while Peter and whoever else you talk about created this Catholic Church (that wasn't called Catholic at the time),
they were MARRIED!!
When did they decide that the next generation of leaders cuold no longer procreate??
and why???
Duh, you DID say it (as my quote of your original post shows.)
However after both Nygdan and I caught you,
you reworded your original post to delete that you said it. YOU SAID
that because these men weren't married, they took out their sexual
frustrations by molesting boys. That's what you said. No amount
of editing of the original post will change that. (you edited it twice).
My quote of your original post is there.