It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
originally posted by: kruphix
One thing I keep seeing pop up in "defense" of the Unite the Right protest this weekend is people using a convoluted argument of "freedom of speech".
Either they argue that the issue wasn't the "Unite the Right", but it was instead the counter protesters trying to take away "Unite the Right"s freedom of speech. Or they give the good ol' "Well I don't support their message, but I support their freedom of speech".
Let's all take a step back and remember what "Freedom of speech" entails. Quite simply, it is the 1st amendment.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
There...that's it...nothing more, nothing less.
There is nothing saying that "If Neo-Nazi's want to protest, everyone has to shut up and like it". It doesn't say, "If someone is protesting on a given day, then no one else can protest against them". It doesn't say, "You can have any disgusting view you want and publicly declare it without facing any consequences....like being fired."
"Freedom of Speech" involves one thing and one thing only...the GOVERNMENT will not create laws that prohibit your freedom of speech. That's it.
Hopefully, not really, this will end some of the illogical arguments of people claiming they are only supporting White Supremacists "freedom of speech".
Utterly false. First amendment protects free speech, it isn't the same as free speech. Rookie mistake. You need more than a refresher.
originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Utterly false. First amendment protects free speech, it isn't the same as free speech. Rookie mistake. You need more than a refresher.
Oh please...go on.
Please enlighten us on how "free speech" should protect a Neo-Nazi from being fired.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: kruphix
Solid point, there are too many people on this site who are ignorant to the fact that the Constitution is not a list of things we can do but a list of things the government cannot do.
“There was no police presence,” Ms. Caine-Conley said. “We were watching people punch each other; people were bleeding all the while police were inside of barricades at the park, watching. It was essentially just brawling on the street and community members trying to protect each other.
originally posted by: bender151
a reply to: kruphix
No is suggesting you can't counter protest. The problem is violence. Are you an adult? Do you really need this explained to you? I don't care if someone is saluting whoever, it doesn't give anyone else a riggt to assault them. The irony is that, even though the radical right spoke a big game, it was (and has been) predominantly the left that actually acts most like Nazis... using violence to either silence dissenting opinions, or to generally intimidate people they don't agree with. Go on Facebook and I bet you can scroll for a minute without seeing comments from the left about how its okay to,l assault neo Nazis because that's who we fought against in WW2, or some other ignorant bull#. We didn't fight Nazis because of the words they used, in case you need a history lesson too.
originally posted by: kruphix
There is nothing saying that "If Neo-Nazi's want to protest, everyone has to shut up and like it". It doesn't say, "If someone is protesting on a given day, then no one else can protest against them". It doesn't say, "You can have any disgusting view you want and publicly declare it without facing any consequences....like being fired."
"Freedom of Speech" involves one thing and one thing only...the GOVERNMENT will not create laws that prohibit your freedom of speech. That's it.
originally posted by: RazorV66
You are exactly right but the key words in the exact verbiage is "peaceably assemble"
The police should have been there in force to make sure that the peaceable assembly of these brain dead retards didn't escalate into what it did.
originally posted by: kurthall
a reply to: kruphix
I have no problem, with people making asses out of themselves. They can do it all day long. As long as lines are not crossed. Neo Nazis are nuts. They hate, to just hate.
Those I do feel bad for are the history buffs who were probably there actually trying to defend historical monuments ( there are a lot of civil war buffs in the area ). Those guys got the raw end of the whole ordeal, most likely undeservidly...I doubt those guys were the racist kkk type.
Whataboutism is a propaganda technique formerly used by the Soviet Union in its dealings with the Western world, and subsequently used as a form of propaganda in post-Soviet Russia. When criticisms were leveled at the Soviet Union, the Soviet response would be "What about..." followed by an event in the Western world