It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Operation Hyperstorm

page: 1
13

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 13 2017 @ 02:09 PM
link   
I am feeling that I live in a different world, than the one I was born in. And this is not Mr. Mandela's fault, but... the connectivity opportunism, released by US intelligence, the idea called - Internet.

We have the easy access to each other - a tool far greater than anything ever created before. As the net encompassed the world, we are now living not in connectivity, a relative proximity with your neighbors, but in hyperconnectivity, the possibility to touch information spawned the same second in any part of the planet, anything, everywhere, instantly... We live in a hyperweb, a hyperworld.

But let's not be so proud. Because it was a con. AcaCIA con. The events we are experiencing today were very well programmed to happen. Not in detail but in essence. And again this is not a "CERN raises the devil", or "Mandela dances on bushfire" type of thread. It's all about the amount of preparation and tactical approach the USA intelligence and the execution of it's most sublime operation - Operation Hyperstorm.

Operation Hyperstorm is like man-made climate change, a type of social climate that is darkening the skies and burying the human personality underground, leaving at the surface only the Hyperstorm of Anonymity.

By creating this climate the AcaCIA challenged the whole world to change its social behaviour. They knew this is a risky move but they did it because most of the times raising before the flop is winning poker decision. It gives you the lead afterwards. That's why it was a good move. America needed the lead, thus they threw their chips on the table, by introducing the Internet to the world. And they knew what thunder will follow. However, as the other players on the table were still astonished by the bet size, AcaCIA were already planning their bets on the turn and the river.


-pun break-
The human, who was just a pig few decades ago, nowdays is a space pig. (thus we have a space farming)
-pun break-


The main aspect taken into account into this poker hand was the possibilities of social programming. Human masses are "Mountains in disguise". If an intelligence agency like AcaCIA manage to create such a Mountain and direct it at desired trajectory, it instantly would wield a power only equal to Mjölnir itself.

But how to do this?!

Social sciences, widely used by American government already had the answer. Seed idealism, connect it with self-worth, and bind it with anonymity. Water this seed within a group of people and watch your plant growing. Social engineering... Nothing unheard of...

The anonymity(unity) and abolishment of the ego, intricately incorporated in the New Age culture, simultaneously created by AcaCIA with the Internet, were the keys for holding the lead on the poker table.

Loosing the sense of separateness gives the person unimagined otherwise ability to merge in the social Mountains, which later are going to be directed for the goals of the agency.

So, the important question... WHAT is the real product of Operation Hyperstorm?

-The ability to social-engineer as many as needed terrorist organizations like Al'Qaeda, ISIS, etc. which directed properly will serve as the chaos trigger in the WORLD LIVE TV SHOW known as "order out if chaos" or "contra terrorism".

-The ability to engineer vigilante groups like ANONYMOUS, which when directed properly will create the social conditions for desired dictates, groups, and ideas to thrive.

-The ability all this groups to be SELF-MAINTAINED and INDESTRUCTIBLE, as their power is in the NETWORK of people itself, not the separate people working for its existence.




posted on Jul, 13 2017 @ 02:11 PM
link   
.....continued (character limitation)



Other intelligence agencies try to plug into the social hyperweb and change the game, some even try to shut themselves from it(like China did with its firewall), but in vain...

Third world war?? No such thing...
Democracy... It's getting obsolete in a new brave hyperworld...
...but see..., a social MMORPG? - EXACTLY!

The game is ON.

The network is everywhere, it's viral, and it wants. YOU!



posted on Jul, 13 2017 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Argentbenign


Interesting post and ideas. One question -- What is acaCIA?



posted on Jul, 13 2017 @ 03:06 PM
link   
To carry on with the poker analogy....

If you can't spot the chump at the table....it's you!



posted on Jul, 13 2017 @ 04:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: icanteven
a reply to: Argentbenign


Interesting post and ideas. One question -- What is acaCIA?



This is an indirect way from my side to show whom is behind CIA


“And it shall come to pass in that day, that the mountains shall drop down new wine, and the hills shall flow with milk, and all the rivers of Judah shall flow with waters, a fountain shall come forth of the house of the Lord, and shall water the valley of #tim.” www.masonicworld.com...

edit on 13-7-2017 by Argentbenign because: mobile

edit on 13-7-2017 by Argentbenign because: mobile



posted on Jul, 13 2017 @ 06:13 PM
link   
Interesting thought ... so all those individuals who live separately across the world and share a common interest, can join together anonymously to form the equivalent of an internet action group for as a long as they want. People can come and go but that action group remains. It may even help contribute to the formation of a real world action group. The presence of this group takes on its own life.

Sometime this is a good thing; "Save our pub" action group, a flashmob of mime artists at a train station, but sometimes it becomes a bad thing like a terrorist group.

The set of all possible human thoughts and concerns becomes like the surface of an ocean, then each of these thoughts and concerns becomes like a standing wave node at some point on this surface. Sometimes they will generate new nodes (like thoughts of national independence or the anger at some event like Grenwell). Some will slowly fade away and others build up to replace them. Some may join together.



posted on Jul, 13 2017 @ 09:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Argentbenign

Hi AB.
Very thoughtful post as usual.

Are you suggesting that the perceived anonymity of the internet, allows TPTB to infiltrate any start-up group, including revolutionaries and terroristas? They're in any and every group that starts gaining momentum, and then place events so that they can control that momentum?

There will be no more secrets, when they roll-out the mind-police.

Another good reason to disconnect.



posted on Jul, 13 2017 @ 09:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Argentbenign

This premise is quite interesting.

Would you venture to say it is an inevitable result of the social engineers of the past having the foresight to utilize the technology appropriately and continue their studies on the population that originated with Wellington House/ Tavistock Institute?

Would this then mean it was not a gamble at all, but the result of the previous decade of research on human behavior in groups?

Further, is there any aspect of this that is out of their control? Or would it be best to assume that their ultimate aim is in the best interest of humanity, something along the lines of the road to hell being paved with good intentions?



posted on Jul, 13 2017 @ 09:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Argentbenign

Sounds like the plot from fight club.

We may find out what the end game is sooner than later the way things are headed.



posted on Jul, 13 2017 @ 11:15 PM
link   
Thanks for my next video game title.



posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 01:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Nothin
a reply to: Argentbenign

Are you suggesting that the perceived anonymity of the internet, allows TPTB to infiltrate any start-up group, including revolutionaries and terroristas? They're in any and every group that starts gaining momentum, and then place events so that they can control that momentum?
.

Yes, if a newly born group attracts their attention, It's a piece of cake to "turn it to their own agenda". They have the resources needed and know the methods for this. As long as the group is a chimera(non-centralized organization or group) it is "moldable". That's is why TPTB don't like at all strong world leaders who lead their countries like kings. For example: Chávez, Gaddafi, Putin. If they cannot be "talked over" and given money under the table to change their rulership policy, they are just targeted for "removal". Sometimes however to remove somebody you need less than a Tomahawk missle. They can remove a "ruling" politician only by infiltrating the social masses of his country and directing them against him. If they are not successful, then is obviously a time for war under inadequate reasons... However some dominative world leaders might be chosen on purpose and placed in power by the same agencies who would later remove them when not needed. And they will use the same qualities for which they have had put them in power as the excuse of removing them. It's like a Disney scenario. Tom and Jerry perpetual motion. For example when the authoritarian Tom sets a trap for Jerry, but after short chase he catches himself into the trap instead. Most likely that's going on in North Korea and nevermind it is doubtful(I don't have enough trustful sources), it could happening even in Syria.



posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 01:04 AM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

You're welcome, hope it turns a good game



posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 01:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: Argentbenign

This premise is quite interesting.

Would you venture to say it is an inevitable result of the social engineers of the past having the foresight to utilize the technology appropriately and continue their studies on the population that originated with Wellington House/ Tavistock Institute?

Would this then mean it was not a gamble at all, but the result of the previous decade of research on human behavior in groups?

Further, is there any aspect of this that is out of their control? Or would it be best to assume that their ultimate aim is in the best interest of humanity, something along the lines of the road to hell being paved with good intentions?


Yes, I think the basis of the ideas for social engineering which they mastered after the 60s, and continue to master today are as old as Tavistock, if not even older.

The gamble is always at hand, but they probably were having a lot of solid research and studies to place that bet on, as you propose. From my viewpoint it was a bit risky move, however from their point of view it might be seen as a "concrete and foolproof plan".

The next question is the most interesting one. Is it out of control? Not yet, but is dangerously progressing into that direction. We're getting high to fast, like a junkie in unknown Thai basement, taking overdose from drugs made of fish poo. The social models of the next few decades are obscure even for the science of today and the "social poles" might turn instantly, without an alarm, or reminder. For the time being they are still holding the leash of the dog(social pet program), but they fed that beast quite well, and it wants to run free... We'll see how it goes. The worst it can happen is the beast to go really mad, break the leash and wreck havoc, which will mirror itself on practical level with thousands of minor world-scattered conflicts on social and economical level.



posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 01:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: stormcell
Interesting thought ... so all those individuals who live separately across the world and share a common interest, can join together anonymously to form the equivalent of an internet action group for as a long as they want. People can come and go but that action group remains. It may even help contribute to the formation of a real world action group. The presence of this group takes on its own life.

Sometime this is a good thing; "Save our pub" action group, a flashmob of mime artists at a train station, but sometimes it becomes a bad thing like a terrorist group.

The set of all possible human thoughts and concerns becomes like the surface of an ocean, then each of these thoughts and concerns becomes like a standing wave node at some point on this surface. Sometimes they will generate new nodes (like thoughts of national independence or the anger at some event like Grenwell). Some will slowly fade away and others build up to replace them. Some may join together.






Nice words and Absolutely on the topic.



posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 08:16 AM
link   
Nice post! You have a very plausible/probable theory.
Definetly something for me to think on...



new topics

top topics



 
13

log in

join