Julian Assange Just Destroyed The FBI, CIA And Fake News In An Epic Tweetstorm

At least trump will have Assange's back, i mean he said he loved wikileaks and Assange was a hero during the election..

..unless... oh.. wait.

originally posted by: paraphi
a reply to: intrptr

Here you go. Some of the urban myths and fantasies challenged by this article published in 2012.

Assange has been afforded more opportunities to challenge the warrant for his arrest than almost any other defendant in English legal history. This is hardly "persecution" or a "witch-hunt".

Source New Statesman

Pffft, just as long as he leaves_the_embassy. He already agreed to answer to any delegation they send. They already sent one in fact. Probably to talk him into leaving...

Just set foot outside for one minute Julian... just_one_minute.

a reply to: Xcathdra
Not the level of greed and control I was referring to. As for greed, pretty sure that trying to protect your revenue is something any reasonable person would try to do. And control that I talk about is control over masses of people, not a leak.

If it was not him there would be someone else doing what he does. Getting rid of him will create more of f him.

Look at him, he helps Trump win, and now Trump turns his back on him!

A criminal or not, he does help the common people to see how much criminal can a government act according to some devious actions, in my book that's fair.

Its a standard move. Accuse your potential accuser of doing what you know you are guilty of. Assange has dirt on pedophiles in very high places protected by the CIA and FBI, so they accuse him of it. Hillary had close ties to Putin, so Trump got accused of it.

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: 727Sky

As for his charges ironic that he dismisses them as fake and does his best to avoid answering them all the while demanding others be held accountable.

He's said REPEATEDLY that he is happy to answer the charges INSIDE THE EMBASSY.

Repeatedly.

No he has said he would be willing to only be interviewed inside the embassy and since embassys are considered sovereign territory of another nation Assange and his lawyers know full well that interviews conducted in that manner can be non admissible in the originating countries legal system.

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: paraphi

Assange exhausted all legal avenues regarding his extradition to Sweden and has chosen to sit in the Equadorian consulate.

Crap. He knows as soon as he sets foot outside the embassy he will be subjected to extraordinary rendition (kidnapping) by US government to face charges of Treason (whistleblowing) in a Kangaroo court setting, a show trial with the verdict already determined and punishment fixed.

The rape investigation is a cover story, to discredit Assange and wikileaks and cover up they want to punish Assange, not for rape but for exposing state corruption.

If rape was all that was involved the Ecuadorian Embassy wouldn't have granted him asylum. As is, The then president of Ecuador was so grateful to Assange for exposing the US government (CIA) meddling in Ecuador to influence media and elections that he welcomed Assange into the embassy with open arms to protect him.

Nothing but fear mongering and lies.

All the claims Assange has made about what "could happen" to him are based on lies and a twisting of hte legalities involved..

For example Assange / legal team have claimed -
* - He would be charged with treason in the US - A flat out lie since treason only applies to US nationals. It cannot be applied to foreign nationals, and with Assange being Australian he CANNOT be charged with treason in the US.

* - He would face the death penalty - A lie since nothing he can be charged with carries the death penalty as a punishment upon conviction.

* - He would be sent to Gitmo - A lie since Gitmo is reserved solely for enemy combatants taken on the battlefield by the US military. Secondly Assange would not fall under military jurisdiction but federal civilian jurisdiction.

If you want to perpetuate his lies then dont get pissy when you get called out... Rendition in this case is not an option and is only being used to skew the situation in his favor.

He and his legal team are lying in order to create a false narrative to gain sympathy for what he has done and his attempt to try and skirt the consequences of what he has done. I find it impossible to believe that given what Assange and wikileaks engage in that they could not see the possibility of legal action begin taken agaist them down the road.

Assange can leave the embassy at any point he wishes. There is a valid outstanding warrant issued for him from Sweden only. He needs to stop blaming the US for his sexual dalliances in Sweden.

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: paraphi

If you had been following the Assange story from the beginning, you would know the rape charges are bogus. You would know that the first prosecutor to examine the case dropped it.

It was resurrected only for political purposes. He is, understandably, the proverbial Enemy Of The State, and the state, in case you wonder, is the United States Government. The same entity that routinely commits military aggression under fraud.

Please support your claim the rape charges are bogus and please include your evidence.

originally posted by: Mike.Ockizard
a reply to: Xcathdra
Not the level of greed and control I was referring to. As for greed, pretty sure that trying to protect your revenue is something any reasonable person would try to do. And control that I talk about is control over masses of people, not a leak.

Please clarify / qualify then how your statement applies to Assange / wikileaks given the evidence to date.

originally posted by: Substracto
Look at him, he helps Trump win, and now Trump turns his back on him!

A criminal or not, he does help the common people to see how much criminal can a government act according to some devious actions, in my book that's fair.

So according to your position (re: Trump winning) was wikileaks lying then when they said Russia was not their leak source?

How can Trump turn his back on someone he is not associated with?

originally posted by: Dutchowl
Its a standard move. Accuse your potential accuser of doing what you know you are guilty of. Assange has dirt on pedophiles in very high places protected by the CIA and FBI, so they accuse him of it. Hillary had close ties to Putin, so Trump got accused of it.

Conversely Assange is doing the very action you are accusing the US government of doing to Assange.

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Xcathdra


It's interesting how a few years ago Assange would have been an investigative journalist for exposing the truth. Now he's an activist. The sooner this BS society implodes the better.

Like I said if its exposing illegal actions then yes. If its not then whats the point?

He started out as a bit of transparency Zealot...

Now he just works for the Russians...

When the Panama Papers leaked (not through Assange) exposing Putin and his Cronies hiding Billions...Julian actually had the balls to knock the leaks.

Notice how with all his leaks...nothing really damaging to Russia/Putin/FSB leaks...not through Wikileaks anyways..

He is looking for the Edward Snowden travel plan cuz he has cabin fever in his embassy prison.

To do that he has proven he will damage the USA every chance he gets and do Russia's bidding..

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: 727Sky

The UN "ruling" has absolutely no effect on the legal proceedings of sovereign nations. Something Assange just does not seem to understand. He is not a journalist but an activist. He is not a whistle blower and what he releases, the 99.5% of it, show absolutely no illegal activity / wrong doing.

As for his charges ironic that he dismisses them as fake and does his best to avoid answering them all the while demanding others be held accountable.

I thought he said he would turn himself in to US authorities regarding Mannings sentence being commuted. What happened there?

I support him when it comes to exposing honest to god illegal activity. Everything else though, well he made his bed and he will eventually have to lay in it.

At the same time, most of these nations are signatories to various UN accords, the UN Charter, and so on. He is functionally being imprisoned without trial or charges.

You have to ask yourself WHY they have aimed trumped up charges against him. Only a fool thinks the motive is pure.

originally posted by: shell69
a reply to: 727Sky

Actually, it's the media that demonizes folks. I don't care WHO you are, if for whatever reason the worldwide media is told to run a story by it's network owners, then it's on blast & will ruin ur life- permanently.

Yup, as long as a corrupt military-industrial complex elite owns the media, we have little recourse. I keep on telling people, especially activists, that this is one of the things that most needs to be addressed to change the world. Whoever controls the flow of information, controls the critical mass of people.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra

He's a Russian tool who overwhelms with a deluge of data. He doesn't reveal. The volume alone is purposeful in that it conceals just by its size. Who here has actually combed through all of these email releases by wiki?

Oh please, that's straight out of a Pentagon propaganda manual. You've really bought that line haven't ya?

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
At the same time, most of these nations are signatories to various UN accords, the UN Charter, and so on. He is functionally being imprisoned without trial or charges.

Incorrect - Assange is perfectly free to leave the embassy. His stay in the embassy was imposed by himself when he sought and was granted sanctuary. Since he is free to leave he is neither imprisoned nor was he done so without charge. Sweden on the other hand does have charges.

He used the British legal system to its full extent and then some and lost.
He used the Swedish legal system to its full extent and lost.
He used the European Union legal system to its full extent and lost.
The UN committee that put out their "opinion" has absolutely no bearing on the legal system of the entities involved. It is their opinion and nothing more.

Sweden finally agreed to interview Assange in the embassy and did so. The result of that interview was Assange once again filing a motion to quash the Swedish arrest warrant and have it dismissed. The Swedish courts denied the motion.

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
You have to ask yourself WHY they have aimed trumped up charges against him. Only a fool thinks the motive is pure.

Please provide the evidence the charges are trumped up. I find it ironic that you will believe without question something Assange says or publishes but throw up roadblocks when he is accused of something.

You have to ask yourself WHY has Assange and his lawyers consistently LIED about US actions in order to get out of something in Sweden? You have to ask yourself WHY Assange lied when he said he would turn himself over to the US if Manning was set free.

a reply to: Indigo5

Because Russia, unlike the US, would end Assanges life without a care as to how it would play in the media.

For a clear example of that look up what happened when a terror group in the middle east abducted several soviet diplomats and killed one of them. The response was not expected by the group and the response that Russia gave got the immediate release of the diplomats and no further action was ever taken against russian diplomats again.

Also bear in mind Putin was KGB at the time and still is.

a reply to: 727Sky

Good for him.

And thanks in so small part to his efforts that the evil and the corrupt are on their heels because a leak could come from anywhere, at any time.

I think he's done rightly and that Trump was wrong to call for his arrest.

What he's done has placed the pressure and the burden right where it belongs.

Thank you Julian Assange.

You done good. Keep up the word work.

How about pedogate next up, surely there's data out there that would place many of the so-called "elite" in a terrible bind and predicament, and it would be the scandal to end all scandals.

It's time that the whole evil and wicked empire was transformed by the transparency that WikiLeaks makes possible.

The world is a better place because of WikiLeaks.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Deflection. Not going for it. I was talking about others being greedy and control freaks. Not Assange.