20 new science papers find climate driven by solar changes

a reply to: Kashai

You keep posting proven balderdash. D8Tee and I among others keep bringing you real scientist applying real science that refute there every word and you think pounding the lies repeatedly will win us over??!?!?!??

NOT!

Truth of the science, or there are consequences as to whom the idiots are in fact. It is NOT those following Dr. Feynman or Dr. Einstein's methods as the bunch of losers you are parading as 'evidence'. There are about 6 or 7 trying this mess over and over and it is a pitiful thing to witness you guys do the broken record thing with real data that has completely combated the lunacy being provided you to refute the liar AL Gore and his team of media "Sceintists". Sorry, you lose.

Here in my professional opinion is one reason why we are even seeing changes in the climate.

www.ngdc.noaa.gov...

a reply to: Justoneman
The Scientific Method is what distinguishes “science” from other types of study. It is an algorithm or process for investigating the physical world. Here's how it is supposed to work, in seven steps:

1 The scientist observes the available data.

2 He formulates an hypothesis to explain the observations.

3 He derives testable predictions from the hypothesis.

4 He devises experiments or observations to test the predictions.

5 He does the experiments or makes the observations.

6 If the test results match the predictions, he cries “eureka!” and publishes. He can now properly call his hypothesis a
scientific theory or theoretical model. He publishes it along with his data and detailed calculations, so that other scientists can reproduce and verify his work.

7 If the test results fail to match the predictions, the theory is said to be “falsified,” so he discards or revises it and starts over at step 2, with the new observations or experimental results added to the body of available data.

Step 7 is the test of a scientist's integrity. If, instead of discarding or revising falsified theories or models, a disappointed researcher revises the data, to make it fit his predictions, he's no scientist worthy of the name.


Cargo Cult Science

a reply to: Justoneman



You mean science as offered by Nicaragua and Syria as the only other countries in the world that support that.

Real science huh?

Nothing personal but that's really pathetic.

originally posted by: Justoneman
Here in my professional opinion is one reason why we are even seeing changes in the climate.

www.ngdc.noaa.gov...

The "professional opinion" of the supposed environmental scientist who doesn't understaffed the difference between weather and climate?

a reply to: GetHyped

Whats the difference?

It appears that one is fairly predictable out to say three or five days, and the other is not according to the IPCC?

The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.

IPCC TAR The Scientific Basis