It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

North Korea 'will test missiles weekly', senior official tells BBC

page: 4
7
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 17 2017 @ 06:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
We attack Korea, where will those refugees go?


If North Korea responds like they claim they will, we will nuke the crap out of NK, not sure how many refugees will be left unfortunately.

I really want to believe NK will back down if china cuts off all their funding and trade, but honestly I doubt that is going to work. As long as Kim is well taken care of I don't think he cares.

I want to believe NK will not commit self destruction by responding with all out war if we blow up their nuke plant, but somehow I am just not confident they will respond rationally.




posted on Apr, 17 2017 @ 06:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Discotech
a reply to: spiritualarchitect

Take out Kim

And then what ?

Hasn't Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya taught us anything ?

North Koreans are brainwashed probably more than the Hitler youth and the Nazi's were, removing Kim isn't going to solve anything. Kim isn't really a problem to be honest, he's only a problem because we (the west) are constantly making him a problem, I'm sure if we left him alone, dropped sanctions, stopped intimidating him by parking carrier groups off his coast he wouldn't be the petulant child throwing his toys out of the pram that we make him into

To quote the great Sun Tzu


“When you surround an army, leave an outlet free. Do not press a desperate foe too hard.”


a reply to: crazyewok

Didn't we get the same rhetoric from Iran wanting to nuke Israel ? We're only told what the media tells us, how can be so sure on what is said is true ?


The problem isn't really Kim or the regime - the problem is their access to enriched uranium.

If we can destroy their nuke plant without starting WWIII, then as bad as it sounds it is in our best interest to let the regime remain and keep torturing it's people rather than get involved.



posted on Apr, 17 2017 @ 06:22 PM
link   
I wonder if they will have enough trained people to operate the missiles. Because you know every failed Missile Test some one gets a bullet to the head on the spot.



posted on Apr, 17 2017 @ 06:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Stevemagegod
I wonder if they will have enough trained people to operate the missiles. Because you know every failed Missile Test some one gets a bullet to the head on the spot.


They work for the NSA anyway I have no doubt cia and Nsa is all over their scientific communities.



posted on Apr, 17 2017 @ 06:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Stevemagegod
I wonder if they will have enough trained people to operate the missiles. Because you know every failed Missile Test some one gets a bullet to the head on the spot.


They work for the NSA anyway I have no doubt cia and Nsa is all over their scientific communities.


Thats a ridiculous assumption to make. You suggest this as if it's an easy thing to plant a spook into North Korea's nuclear program. Seriously flawed logic, there.



posted on Apr, 17 2017 @ 06:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnonyMason

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Stevemagegod
I wonder if they will have enough trained people to operate the missiles. Because you know every failed Missile Test some one gets a bullet to the head on the spot.


They work for the NSA anyway I have no doubt cia and Nsa is all over their scientific communities.


Thats a ridiculous assumption to make. You suggest this as if it's an easy thing to plant a spook into North Korea's nuclear program. Seriously flawed logic, there.


They have had decades and have done it in other countries with far less time. If they havnt infiltrated by now than they are useless and need to be disbanded immediately.
edit on 4/17/17 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 17 2017 @ 07:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Discotech


The moment its soldier against soldier, all the "Superiority " is lost, an American troop might have night vision, until its stolen and used by the foe. So it all comes down to one guy trying to kill another guy because some politician tells them to. Then it all depends on "Moral" and who has the best fighting mojo and the will to win.
edit on 17-4-2017 by anonentity because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 18 2017 @ 02:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Joneselius

Sometimes its better to shoot the hostage first.



posted on Apr, 18 2017 @ 02:15 AM
link   
a reply to: proximo


We're not going to "nuke the crap" out of North Korea, Proximo. China, South Korea and Japan would be rendered uninhabitable due to the radiation/fallout.



posted on Apr, 18 2017 @ 08:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: AnonyMason

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Stevemagegod
I wonder if they will have enough trained people to operate the missiles. Because you know every failed Missile Test some one gets a bullet to the head on the spot.


They work for the NSA anyway I have no doubt cia and Nsa is all over their scientific communities.


Thats a ridiculous assumption to make. You suggest this as if it's an easy thing to plant a spook into North Korea's nuclear program. Seriously flawed logic, there.


They have had decades and have done it in other countries with far less time. If they havnt infiltrated by now than they are useless and need to be disbanded immediately.


Calm down with the hyperbole.

Anony is right, it's next to impossible to supplant an agent into North Korea. Kim will kill his uncles, his brother and anyone at all he feels is even the slightest threat to him. Do you think he wouldn't do the same with a Korean agent even if he had no reason to suspect he was an agent? Anyone new to Kim would automatically be assumed a threat...the same applied to Kim Jong Il. One doesn't keep throwing assets at NK until one of them survives.

Useless.....that made me laugh.
edit on 18-4-2017 by alphabetaone because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 18 2017 @ 10:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: proximo

I really want to believe NK will back down


So what you're really saying is you want them to say:
"If you attack us we'll just roll over and let you".

Saying you'll counter-attack when attacked isn't making a THREAT.

And just being obnoxious doesn't warrant getting beat up (or NUKED).

I wonder of the NK people would be better off with their beloved dictator(s), or with atomic detonations over their cities?



posted on Apr, 18 2017 @ 10:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Discotech

Didn't we get the same rhetoric from Iran wanting to nuke Israel ? We're only told what the media tells us, how can be so sure on what is said is true ?


The actual quote from Ahmedenijad (however you spell it) was referring to the nation not being on a map, like how the Soviet Union isn't on a map (without war), but the MSM went nuts claiming he said he'd "wipe Israel off the map". This was about 10 years ago now, meanwhile the claim was shown to be a farce the same month the MSM was originally going bonkers about it. If they still push on with it (I haven't checked) wouldn't actually surprise me. But it was a farce.

The FACT then was already that if he nuked Israel they'd counter-attack. Mutually Assured Destruction. And it's the same today with North Korea. Even if they're a backwards people, I'm sure they understand they can't possibly survive launching nukes: MEANING THEY WONT.

What this is really all about, like with Iran, is if they have nukes then we cant bully them into submission. Like bullies on a playground, whom have baseball bats, dont want the kids they want to bully to also have baseball bats.



posted on Apr, 18 2017 @ 01:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: MagnaCarta2015

originally posted by: Miracula2
Oh this is interesting. I wonder if there is any information to back up Infowars claims here below.

"Amidst reports that North Korea now has nuclear-equipped ballistic missiles as experts warn a conflict on the Korean peninsular is more likely than not, it’s important to remember who armed North Korea with nuclear weapons in the first place – namely the U.S. government and the CIA."

www.infowars.com...


Didn't Rumsfeld sell some nuclear reactors to old man Kim via ABB or it might have been a different company?
.


I was too young to be interested in politics and behind the scenes world events back then. I wouldn't know with a google search.




top topics



 
7
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join