Clinton Gives Blame to Gender Bias for Election Failure

a reply to: Logarock

I don't know anyone that wouldn't vote for someone because they are a woman.

Maybe if the Democrats put up someone that was honest, kind and likable they would see different results?

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Logarock

The only issue I'd have is with the term "liberals".

It's the leftists, the socialists that try to rewrite history and change definitions.

It can never be that most people reject their dictatorial brand of politics, it has to be the fault of stupid people.

I think we need to start a movement to stop applying all labels, whether they be right/left - conservative/liberal - democrat/republican, to these politicians. Maybe we should just start calling them by their true name, 'blood sucking vampiric sellouts'. They know no affiliation or loyalty to anyone expect for their true masters greed and power.

Maybe the first step is to simply admit that our government is corrupt. Once you start viewing these political parasites in any light other than the nice black glow of corruption, they have won.

Maybe it is finally time to burn this establishment to the ground and start rebuilding.

"Nuke it from orbit"

a reply to: ClovenSky

Well, it is the only way to be sure. . . . . .

WAIT hold the phone.....I could have sworn she said it was the Russians!!!

I even hear little kids saying,

"Why don't we have a woman president, it's not fair!"

Who teaches kindergarteners stuff like that?

She's just trying to hold on to power...still!

Clinton lost because nobody liked her. People voted for Hillary to stop Trump...That's really it.

Trump won because he excited the base of the republican party. Hillary didn't excite the base, especially the far left base of the party...many of them didn't vote or voted green rather than vote Hillary.

They saw that Hillary cheated to win the primaries and they saw that Trump won his fair and square.

If Trump runs for re election and Hillary is the Democratic nominee again, then Trump will get another term. It's that simple. Nobody want's hillary to be president. LOL

And sure there were some Russian hackers but what did they do...basically just revealed the truth or actual emails and documents. It's a deflection to yell the Russians, the Russians when it's what they revealed that helped stop Hillary.

Women outnumber men.
Hillary's argument seems a bit weak.

Unless she believes that a large segment of the female population identify as men.

originally posted by: xstealth
We should all encourage her to try again in 2020

Who's Hillary's biggest supporter? That can be her campaign manager/cheerleader.

originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: Sublimecraft


See??? This explains why the press is lining up here. Tossing themselves like bugs onto the flame.

I love the smell of exploding insects in the morning.
It smells like--- protein. Pass the French burnt ants.
And this bleachbit is secured for surfing..

For all things unnamed, at the top of my list is the
person who never gives up: as opposed to the twit
who doesn't know when to quit.
It may in fact extend to the people backing her as well.
What does that say about the people quietly running
the planet (like into the toilet), except PLEASE STOP.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ClovenSky

Well, it is the only way to be sure. . . . . .

AAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG.

I had high hopes when I heard a potential candidate speaking the words of nationalism, words of pride in our country, words against the disgusting PC movement and the simple words of freedom against tyranny. I have to humble myself and think 'boy did I get fooled'. I dream there is still time but the actions so far are almost 180 degrees from the words spoken pre election.

I wonder if the powers that be were aware that if she had gotten in, it would have awoke enough of the sheeple that a true massive uprising would have occurred. Maybe he (I can't even speak their names at this point for I am too disgusted) was allowed to win in the effort to try and diffuse the situation.

originally posted by: xstealth
We should all encourage her to try again in 2020

And without the /sarc key, I imagine you're cheroot- deep
in something really volatile and tasty for that one, bud.
I have to agree though, that if she gets another DNC chair
to give her the same help under the table as last year; it
could set the Democrats back a couple of generations...
if not administer the Coup-de-Our-@$$-is-GRASS.

PS Great thread, bumped for at least the warning value.
To the young ones: stay sharp at the rail. The next pot
up may have a lot more than crabs in it. Regards, Itchy

originally posted by: AutonomousMeatPuppet
I even hear little kids saying,

"Why don't we have a woman president, it's not fair!"

Who teaches kindergarteners stuff like that?

Social justice driven media, parents and teachers.
It's indoctrination.

a reply to: Logarock

It is clearly the fault of men that she was not elected.

www.dailywire.com... 6-news&utm_campaign=benshapiro

Hillary Clinton is without question the most unlikable presidential candidate of my lifetime. ...
This is not her fault.

This is her DNA, half of which came from her father (who is a man).

originally posted by: ClovenSky



I wonder if the powers that be were aware that if she had gotten in, it would have awoke enough of the sheeple that a true massive uprising would have occurred. Maybe he (I can't even speak their names at this point for I am too disgusted) was allowed to win in the effort to try and diffuse the situation.

That's a valid conspiracy for why she lost.

Its funny a few professors in New York conducted an experiment that switched the genders of the two presidential candidates in one of the debates using actors.

What they thought this experiment would yield:

Salvatore says he and Guadalupe began the project assuming that the gender inversion would confirm what they’d each suspected watching the real-life debates: that Trump’s aggression—his tendency to interrupt and attack—would never be tolerated in a woman, and that Clinton’s competence and preparedness would seem even more convincing coming from a man.

General observations from one of the professors after seeing the experiment:

I was surprised by how critical I was seeing [Clinton] on a man’s body, and also by the fact that I didn’t find Trump’s behavior on a woman to be off-putting. I remember turning to Maria at one point in the rehearsals and saying, "I kind of want to have a beer with her!" The majority of my extended family voted for Trump. In some ways, I developed empathy for people who voted for him by doing this project, which is not what I was expecting

Based on input from the live audience that watched this, Hillary the man would have faired no better.

An interesting experiment and read if you have the time:

www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2017/march/trump-clinton-debates-gender-reversal.html

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: Logarock

I thought it was the Russians that lost her the election?

What excuse is she going to pull out of her # tomorrow?

But it was Gender Bias Russians.

No.

Most just hate her as an actual person had she been born wit a Dick we would still hate her old evil ass.

Has anybody, ever, said "I like Hillary" without a because behind it?

I don't think so.
I don't think anybody who has ever met Hillary likes Hillary.

a reply to: c2oden

If my pancreas was named Hillary, I'd have it removed.

originally posted by: c2oden

originally posted by: AutonomousMeatPuppet
I even hear little kids saying,

"Why don't we have a woman president, it's not fair!"

Who teaches kindergarteners stuff like that?

Social justice driven media, parents and teachers.
It's indoctrination.

Thanks, haha!
I meant "who" as in, "what kind of monster"

I mean, teaching kids to be bitter over an election they hardly even comprehend. I see a lot of parents who are so proud of their kids acting this way. Disgusting.