It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump admin must ‘vigorously enforce’ obscenity laws to combat trafficking

page: 2
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 10:11 AM
link   
a reply to: phatkhat

This sounds like Christians trying to impose their morals on the public again...




posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 10:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

...Kinda the same as those Muslim Extremists try to do, thinking their laws and moral sets should be imposed on everyone, everywhere...



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 10:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: MyHappyDogShiner
a reply to: Krazysh0t

...Kinda the same as those Muslim Extremists try to do, thinking their laws and moral sets should be imposed on everyone, everywhere...

I fear Christians doing this FAR more than Muslims doing it. Fundamentalist Christians alone make up a sizeable voting block of voters in the country. All Muslims make up 1% of the voting base.
edit on 27-3-2017 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 10:48 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

From the Ohio river south, it just gets worse and worse until you find yourself in Florida, asking yourself what the hell is going on around here?.

Maybe the government does need to write a law or two to keep the zealots in their place since those zealots can't figure out that regardless of what they think or believe, some people won't think or believe the same nonsense as they do.

The church has needed to be reigned in for a way longer time than any government has even existed.



posted on Mar, 27 2017 @ 10:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: MyHappyDogShiner
a reply to: Krazysh0t
The church has needed to be reigned in for a way longer time than any government has even existed.


Agreed. Forget Sharia Law. Encroaching Biblical Law should be what we are looking out for.



posted on Mar, 28 2017 @ 06:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

More than that...angry feminists want to use sex as a weapon and this is a threat.



posted on Mar, 28 2017 @ 06:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: MyHappyDogShiner
a reply to: Krazysh0t

From the Ohio river south, it just gets worse and worse until you find yourself in Florida, asking yourself what the hell is going on around here?.

Maybe the government does need to write a law or two to keep the zealots in their place since those zealots can't figure out that regardless of what they think or believe, some people won't think or believe the same nonsense as they do.

The church has needed to be reigned in for a way longer time than any government has even existed.




Nope..

Governments are millinia older than Christianity.. and all other religions im sure..



posted on Mar, 28 2017 @ 06:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

laws like the comstock act

en.wikipedia.org...




In 1915, architect William Sanger was charged under the New York law against disseminating contraceptive information.[13] His wife Margaret Sanger was similarly charged in 1915 for her work The Woman Rebel. Sanger circulated this work through the U.S. postal service, effectively violating the Comstock Law. On appeal, her conviction was reversed on the grounds that contraceptive devices could legally be promoted for the cure and prevention of disease.[14]

The prohibition of devices advertised for the explicit purpose of birth control was not overturned for another eighteen years. During World War I, U.S. servicemen were the only members of the Allied forces sent overseas without condoms.[citation needed]

In 1932, Sanger arranged for a shipment of diaphragms to be mailed from Japan to a sympathetic doctor in New York City. When U.S. customs confiscated the package as illegal contraceptive devices, Sanger helped file a lawsuit. In 1936, a federal appeals court ruled in United States v. One Package of Japanese Pessaries that the federal government could not interfere with doctors providing contraception to their patients.[14]

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) struck down one of the remaining contraception Comstock laws in Connecticut and Massachusetts. However, Griswold only applied to marital relationships.[15] Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972) extended its holding to unmarried persons as well.[16]

en.wikipedia.org...



what, you think trump is gonna do anything that would inhibit hit ability to be wandering around the dressing rooms of miss teen USA or his midnight internet strolls?



posted on Mar, 28 2017 @ 06:41 AM
link   
a reply to: phatkhat

well... keep trying to ban abortion, keep allowing so many of our hospitals to just refuse to intervene in the most effective ways possible when a pregnancy turns sour, keep trying to close down planned parenthood, keep trying to get coverage for birth control and maternity care out of insurance policies...
then don't be surprised when women come to the conclusion that sex just isn't worth it anymore!!
oh, you didn't mean it as that kind of weapon???



posted on Mar, 28 2017 @ 07:00 AM
link   
a reply to: phatkhat

Sounds like you should look into legalizing prostitution then.



posted on Mar, 28 2017 @ 09:54 AM
link   
a reply to: dawnstar

Umm, the guys that want to ban abortion are the very same ones that want to enforce obscenity laws. And I'm sure some women might come to your conclusion, but others won't. Regardless, technology is gonna be the cure.
Like they start corrupting politicians, they we will have replace the politicians with machines as well.


edit on 28-3-2017 by phatkhat because: (no reason given)

edit on 28-3-2017 by phatkhat because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 28 2017 @ 09:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

They planning on doing just that using robots, to bypass the PC laws. I would like to see how good the bots really look, though. I personally think VR would be the thing to use.
edit on 28-3-2017 by phatkhat because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 28 2017 @ 10:23 AM
link   
a reply to: phatkhat

They need to cross the uncanny valley first. There is a LONG way to go before that can be accomplished though. Until then, it's pretty obvious you are just screwing an overdeveloped sex toy.



posted on Mar, 28 2017 @ 10:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

You mean the bots? I agree that the ones proposed sure looked clunky. They need to utilize VR first, then the bots when they get cheap enough.



posted on Mar, 28 2017 @ 10:33 AM
link   
a reply to: phatkhat

You didn't read my link on the uncanny valley did you? It's not so simple of just introducing VR. Though I'm not sure I'd want to wear some clunky headset while having sex with a robot anyways... I'd more want it to be as close to normal sex as possible.



posted on Mar, 28 2017 @ 10:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Not all are clunky, especially the ones utilizing cellphones. And sure it won't satisfy everyone, but it'll fix a problem for many.



posted on Mar, 28 2017 @ 11:50 AM
link   
a reply to: phatkhat

pornography does indeed affect violent male predatory sexual libido..


i say get rid of porno.



posted on Mar, 28 2017 @ 03:46 PM
link   
a reply to: tony9802

states a 'guy' named Tony




top topics



 
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join