It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Ministry of Antiquities tonight announced the probable identity of the royal colossus discovered last week in Matariya
district, Cairo (ancient Heliopolis).
Few Hieroglyphic signed and initial studies carried out on fragments of the colossus reveal that it belongs to king Psammetich I(664-610 BC)-26 Dynasty.
The torso’s back-pillar has preserved one of the five names of king Psammetich I. If it belongs to the later, it is the largest statue of the Late Period that was ever discovered in Egypt. This date explains the puzzling features of different ancient stylistic details since the Late Period, which is known
for its archaizing art.
The temple of Matariya is well known as one of the most important sites of pharaonic religion, since it was considered to be the
place of the world`s creation by the sun-god. For about 2400 years, most kings erected their monuments in the temple. Because of the vicinity to modern Cairo, the site was heavily destroyed in antiquity, from the Late Roman times onwards to the Mameluke era. The blocks of the temple were used to build various monuments in Cairo such as Bab el-Nasr and others. It is therefore, especially noted that in this site there are still important monuments that can be found even today.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Byrd
This makes a bunch of people look really inept. I am surprised this news came out.
Seems like archeologists are a fickle bunch.
originally posted by: Byrd
Psamtik I was one of the first kings of what's known as the "Saite Dynasty" and reigned from about 664 BC to 610 BC; one of the more successful pharaohs of this time period.
Can you tell me which archaeologists were involved in covering it up ?
See I love that on one hand the credulous have these people as carrying out the most successful conspiracy theory in history, involving tens of thousands of people over two hundred years and yet on another, they publish their errors the second they are realised
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Marduk
I never said there was a cover up in this case, in fact I was surprised how honest they were. And quick too.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: rexsblues
You are more than likely right, If anything does not fit the current gangs (archeologist) feelings it is discarded.
In archeology if it doesn't fit it doesn't exist.
Maybe there's two groups of Archaeologists, the first who are controlling the world and keeping it a secret and the second who couldn't cover their own noses if they were sneezing.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Byrd
This makes a bunch of people look really inept. I am surprised this news came out.
Seems like archeologists are a fickle bunch.
originally posted by: HannahForever
Keep updating us....here are some pics www.dailymail.co.uk...
originally posted by: seagull
Sounds like a case of leaping before they looked.
Rather a cool find! What does it change about what we think we know of Ancient Egypt? I would think not a whole lot, it is after all only one piece of statuary.