Lets get this straight, it is a man's opinion and no more, in actual fact the interview on tape is the most ignorant piece of work from Hannity he's
such a twat, the only length of conversation is pro forma between Hannity and another guest, Binney gets to say very little in fact, and is shut off
by Hannity, since Hannity made an error in the first place re FISA formation. IOW, it's a rubbish piece, to discredit the NYT
All the man is actually saying is what we already know, there can be surveillance with sod all warrants etc, even Hannity acknowledges that...once the
penny er um, drops...not. He already knew that.
In edit, Binney has said much more profound things re the DNC hacking for instance. It was or is, his opinion that the hacking of the DNC was a false
flag operation by the CIA itself, not a Russian effort given that in his opinion there should have been more info related as to how Wikileaks became
recipients of that information in the first place.
"I expected to see the IP’s or other signatures of APT’s 28/29 [the entities which the U.S. claims hacked the Democratic emails] and where they
were located and how/when the data got transferred to them from DNC/HRC [i.e. Hillary Rodham Clinton]/etc. They seem to have been following APT 28/29
since at least 2015, so, where are they?"
"Further, once we see the data being transferred to them, when and how did they transfer that data to Wikileaks? This would be evidence of trying to
influence our election by getting the truth of our corrupt system out."
"And, as Edward Snowden said, once they have the IP’s and/or other signatures of 28/29 and DNC/HRC/etc., NSA would use Xkeyscore to help trace data
passing across the network and show where it went."
"In addition, since Wikileaks is (and has been) a cast iron target for NSA/GCHQ/etc for a number of years there
should be no excuse for them missing data going to any one associated with Wikileaks."
The passages above have various sources, the only thing there that could be lessened is that the time period from when he left could have something
new added that surpasses what he already knows, and possibly still was the Russians activities..it's very tricky and I have nothing more to add to
The NSA is all hooked into everything. And when all else fails they just buy the data collected by the telecom's + Google's + etc's for all the rest.
This allows them to circumnavigate the FISA courts etc altogether, last I heard. With the phones transcribing all of the audio it picks up on the
mic's into text files, it makes easy work of dealing with the obscene amount of 'data' with everyone talking on and around their phones all the time.
Then factor in AI like Google's, which is designed to study us our every word -if not just for its mass machine learning agenda (which it isn't just
for that)- and you can begin to realize just how big Big Brothers THUMB is.
edit on 7-3-2017 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason
Yeah, I don't buy being out of the NSA. There are always friends and colleagues who have reach. Working for and associated with can be the same thing
with regards to the IC. The question is, was his security clearance rescinded? That's what matters and depending on his position, the answer isn't
edit on 7-3-2017 by PRSpinster because: (no reason given)
edit on 7-3-2017 by PRSpinster because: Sentence
I didn't vote for Trump but I can say this. The man is stupid about certain things, no doubt. But he isn't just blindly ignorant about everything. His
Daddy may have bought his entrance into Wharton but the Dumpster graduated on his own. You don't make it through Wharton unless you are the #. That is
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.