It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: amazing
Of they were shot at, arrested and hospitalized and unable to retrieve their dogs. That's probably a lot closer to the truth.
And secondly....if one man burns a tent or one man leaves a couple of dogs do you then condemn all protesters?
originally posted by: thesaneone
Kind of quiet in here, any other time a an animal story comes up people call for death but since it was about the pipeline zip.
I have no idea what they thought. But since they were on treatied land, and forced out by militarized police, because of corporate interests. Well, you do the math.
FORT YATES, ND – In a unanimous vote, Standing Rock Sioux tribal council members voted to close the network of encampments behind the Dakota Access Pipeline protests within 30 days, including the main Oceti Sakowin, Rosebud, and Sacred Stone camps. Council members also voted against providing any temporary camps or shelters to individuals who should remain at the camps after the February 19 deadline. The decision was made in an emergency meeting held on Friday, January 20 at the tribe’s headquarters in Fort Yates, North Dakota.
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Liquesence
I have no idea what they thought. But since they were on treatied land, and forced out by militarized police, because of corporate interests. Well, you do the math.
You are not aware that the Standing Rock Tribe asked them to leave ?
You are ill informed about this whole situation, like most SJW's are.
Did you know Standing Rocks sister had served within the Obama administration?
Did you know there is existing pipeline crossing where they are at?
Did you know the pipeline follows an existing pipeline corridor?
FORT YATES, ND – In a unanimous vote, Standing Rock Sioux tribal council members voted to close the network of encampments behind the Dakota Access Pipeline protests within 30 days, including the main Oceti Sakowin, Rosebud, and Sacred Stone camps. Council members also voted against providing any temporary camps or shelters to individuals who should remain at the camps after the February 19 deadline. The decision was made in an emergency meeting held on Friday, January 20 at the tribe’s headquarters in Fort Yates, North Dakota.
“We want to stress that we are cleaning the camps, not clearing them,” the tribe posted on Facebook on Saturday. “We do not support or endorse any ‘raids.’ We have not asked for law enforcement to assist in clearing camps and in fact have repeatedly told them there will be no forcible removal.”
I know the previous proposed pipeline route and the current. The previous was above the land, the current is through the tip of the reservation.
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Liquesence
I know the previous proposed pipeline route and the current. The previous was above the land, the current is through the tip of the reservation.
You just proved how little you know, the pipeline does not go thru reservation land.
originally posted by: DerBeobachter
Any other evidence, pics for example, of the "Frost-Bitten Dogs"? Than some lonely words from a questionable source?
So we just have to believe?
Ah, if it hits the evil leftists(if they even were left, a leftist seems to be everybody that doesn´t fit the rghtwingers nuts agenda), no evidence is needed, alternative facts have to be enough.
Running gag former USA hits it again...
Sane people worldwide even don´t laugh anymore about the former USA and it´s new "King", his followers, they just ignore that idiocracy happening in the OST m,eanwhile, shaking tired their heads and go on with important things.
The former USA isn´t importaqnt anymore, it became nothing more than a running gag.
originally posted by: Liquesence
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Liquesence
I know the previous proposed pipeline route and the current. The previous was above the land, the current is through the tip of the reservation.
You just proved how little you know, the pipeline does not go thru reservation land.
It goes through treatied land.
And the tip (disputed) of the reservation.
edit on 27-2-2017 by Liquesence because: (no reason given)
originally posted by: zosimov
As usual, people seem to be more concerned about the animals that were left behind than the people who left them there.
Sad.
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Liquesence
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Liquesence
I know the previous proposed pipeline route and the current. The previous was above the land, the current is through the tip of the reservation.
You just proved how little you know, the pipeline does not go thru reservation land.
It goes through treatied land.
No, it doesn't. You are wrong. Standing Rock itself did not even argue that mistaken belief in their court case what makes you think you are right and they are wrong?
originally posted by: Liquesence
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Liquesence
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Liquesence
I know the previous proposed pipeline route and the current. The previous was above the land, the current is through the tip of the reservation.
You just proved how little you know, the pipeline does not go thru reservation land.
It goes through treatied land.
No, it doesn't. You are wrong. Standing Rock itself did not even argue that mistaken belief in their court case what makes you think you are right and they are wrong?
No, I'm not.
Look at the damned map, and the proposed pipeline route.
They withdraw all pretence of opposition to the construction of the railroad now being built along the Platte River and westward to the Pacific Ocean, and they will not in future object to the construction of railroads, wagon-roads, mail-stations, or other works of utility or necessity, which may be ordered or permitted by the laws of the United States.
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Liquesence
Yea, you might want to check out what treaty is in effect.
The 1851 treaty is not the correct answer.
Try this one, its the one Standing Rock falls under.
FORT LARAMIE TREATY
APRIL 29, 1868
I'm not the one that is misinformed here.
originally posted by: Liquesence
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Liquesence
Yea, you might want to check out what treaty is in effect.
The 1851 treaty is not the correct answer.
Try this one, its the one Standing Rock falls under.
FORT LARAMIE TREATY
APRIL 29, 1868
I'm not the one that is misinformed here.
The 1868 treaty doesn't change much, either. And those treaties still hold effect.
Try again.