The strangest Coincidence regarding the Pentagon attack on 9/11

a reply to: Matrixsurvivor

Toppled REALLY as for WTC7 it was struck by debris from the North Tower and was damaged the pictures have been shown on here MANY times.

originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: andy06shake

I think we all really know deep down that 757s don't fit through 20ft holes

Except that hole in Pentagon E Ring was measured at 96 feet ........

Yeah, 20 minutes after it was supposedly struck by an airliner...LOL

Amazing thread. The facts you put forth are hard to deny



a reply to: AnAbsoluteCreation

Dp

And still no explanation what human remains they handed to the surviving family members of the passengers and crew of flight 77 for burial.

Still not able to explain away a realtime radio conversation with a inflight pilot that identified an American Airlines passenger jet and watched it crash into the pentagon.

Still not able to explain away that DNA, human remains, eyewitness accounts, on site aftermath photos, and physical evidence proves a passenger jet crashed into the pentagon.

The truth movement still uses pictures of engine parts that obvious had their blading knocked off.

The truth movement uses one or two eyewitness accounts they claim are backed by photographic evidence they will not produce a time line for, cite the photographer's names, nor include the photographer's testimonies.

The hypocrisy of the truth movement is truly damning. They cannot even produce a chain of evidence for their theories. The use of photos out of context is equally telling they care more about fake narratives than truth.

The truth movement only tries to con people with the goal of being relevant. To truly try to solve the "mysteries" of 911 would kill the conspiracy cash cow.

Wake up conspiracists. You are being milked!

And know what's better than being at ATS? Fishing, boating, exercise, going for a walk, camping, astronomy, science lecturers. You know, real life!

Ciao

a reply to: neutronflux

The truth movement still uses pictures of engine parts that obvious had their blading knocked off.

The truth movement uses one or two eyewitness accounts they claim are backed by photographic evidence they will not produce a time line for, cite the photographer's names, nor include the photographer's testimonies.

The hypocrisy of the truth movement is truly damning. They cannot even produce a chain of evidence for their theories. The use of photos out of context is equally telling they care more about fake narratives than truth.

The truth movement only tries to con people with the goal of being relevant. To truly try to solve the "mysteries" of 911 would kill the conspiracy cash cow.

Wake up conspiracists. You are being milked!

The truth movement, the truth movement, the truth movement, the truth movement...

Why is it people who religiously defend the OS narratives, NEVER, question the OS narratives?

For instance, care to explain how a 757-200 can crash at ground level, into the Pentagon without leaving a scratch in the concrete?

A plane weighing tons leaving no galge marks in the cement floors, this is what missing in the OS narratives that cannot stand up to scrutiny.

a reply to: Informer1958

Cite sources not opinions.

a reply to: neutronflux

Cite sources not opinions.

Couldn't answer my above question, I rest my case.

a reply to: Informer1958

Cannot discredit something when it's not even established as a fact, attributed to an eyewitness, or you will not quote a documented source.

Very intellectually dishonest.

Ciao.

PS Hope the movement steps up and gives you answers after 15 years. How many times has the thermite narrative changed?

a reply to: neutronflux

Cannot discredit something when it's not even established as a fact, attributed to an eyewitness, or you will not quote a documented source.

On the contrary it has been established as a fact.







www.abovetopsecret.com...

Very intellectually dishonest.

False.

Because I disagree with you, doesnt mean I am intellectually dishonest.

PS Hope the movement steps up and gives you answers after 15 years. How many times has the thermite narrative changed?

What movement might that be?

a reply to: Informer1958

So easy to debunk.....

Funny? Didn't know the pentagon had bare concrete floors.

Care to show pictures of the original floor coverings? Before the wreckage was cleared and the concrete stripped of its flooring?

Nice using shots were the camera is more parallel to the ground. A camera angle that would hide imperfections.

I do see pits, rubble, and uneven concrete in your choice biased selection. Is that a false statement?

Care to share a date and time line of the posted photos.

Some of the pictures, the concrete seems wet? That wet glossy shine would hide imperfections.

Care to share if the concrete was repaired in anyway?

The truth movement has never posted an out of context photo before. Yes, it is sarcasm.

a reply to: Informer1958

If you can only play: Hey! Look at these photos with no context, no timeline, and no photos of the flooring that originally covered the concrete, then there is no intellectually honest debate...... no point to engage in debate.....

a reply to: neutronflux

Cite sources not opinions. See how that works.

I asked you to show pictures of the original flooring before it was stripped to bare concrete.

Did the pentagon have bare concrete floors on 9/11?

Asked you for the pictures context and timeline.

It is common sense you presented biased pictures that use camera angle and wet glare which hide imperfections.

Is it a false statement camera angle and wet surfaces hide surface imperfections in photos? Example, photos of wet unpolished gemstones makes them look polished. Is that a false statement?

Even asked if it was a false statement the pictures you presented show rubble, pits, and uneven concrete.

What does that have to do with citing sources. Again being intellectually dishonest.

a reply to: neutronflux

I asked you to show pictures of the original flooring before it was stripped to bare concrete.

Who is stating these floors have been striped?

Again being intellectually dishonest.

Just because I do not support or believe in the OS narratives of the Pentagon alleged crash, it does not make me "intellectually dishonest".

However if ridiculing is all you have for debating skills, then you have sadly lost this debate.

a reply to: Informer1958

It's the point you cannot even answer the simplest of questions? Questions of common sense?

You are trying to say the pentagon had bare concrete floors on 9/11? Really......

This is pointless.

And the pictures you showed have construction rubble, surface marring, dents, pits, and uneven concrete. Is that a false statement?

A serious leveling agent, surface coating, or a subfloor will need to be constructed before laying tile or carpet on the presented floors. The pictured surfaces just need stabilizing and leveling for safe office foot traffic. Are these false statements?

a reply to: neutronflux

It's the point you cannot even answer the simplest of questions? Questions of common sense?

Funny how you make accusation of the very things, that you are doing.

You are trying to say the pentagon had bare concrete floors on 9/11? Really......

This is pointless.

You are the one in this thread making it a point, that the Pentagon floors where striped.

Funny? Didn't know the pentagon had bare concrete floors.

Care to show pictures of the original floor coverings? Before the wreckage was cleared and the concrete stripped of its flooring?

Is this a false statement that you never made this claim?

Can you produce the Pentagon photos of the floors before 911 happened?

If you can, please provide what material they where made of?

Also can you give ATS proof to who had the contracts that did the original floors to the Pentagon?

If you are able to provide ATS with photos of Pentagon floors before 911 we will need the name of the photographer.

We also need the time and date to when the photos were taken, it might help also to what kind of camera was used.

These questions are examples of the same "redundant questions" you keep asking me for proof, the door swings both ways here.

See how that works.

a reply to: Informer1958

Not really. You are the one trying to say the pentagon floors started out as bare concrete with damage, pitting, rubble, surface marring, and being uneven?

To state the flooring pictured is suitable for safe office use, suitable for computers/electronics, level for shelving/office furniture is a joke.

It's obvious the flooring you showed is damaged, comprised of areas of loose material, uneven, and totally unsuitable for office use / housing of computers.

It's obvious the flooring you showed, needs stabilizing, repairs, cleaning, leveling before being sealed, and maybe subflooring before applying any finished surface/flooring/carpeting.

Again, the flooring you showed is damage, rough, and unsuitable for any type of office environment/warehousing/housing of computers.

If you don't think it's common sense the pentagon floors were solid, flat, not pitted, not marred, sealed, and finished with a type of flooring before 9/11, then this is truly pointless.

a reply to: Informer1958

You cannot comprehend the basics of a true investigation which starts with the victims?

How did the bodies/remains/DNA of the passengers of flight 77 end up at the pentagon.

The crash of a passenger jet verified by eyewitness accounts.

The remains verified by the coroner's dependent.

The DNA verified by laboratory analysis.

Remains handed over to families for burial.

And you only can post pictures that obviously shows damaged, marred, pitted, stripped concrete? And claim in all seriousness the pentagon had damaged bare concrete for flooring before 9/11?