It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
either produce K15 or bugger off.
Bates accused former colleagues of rushing their research to publication, in defiance of agency protocol. He specified that he did not believe that they manipulated the data upon which the research relied in any way.
"The issue here is not an issue of tampering with data, but rather really of timing of a release of a paper that had not properly disclosed everything it was," he said.
Indeed. But it wasn't "his" data, he did not provide it
He would know if his data has been tempered or corrupted.
Bates accused former colleagues of rushing their research to publication, in defiance of agency protocol. He specified that he did not believe that they manipulated the data upon which the research relied in any way.
"The issue here is not an issue of tampering with data, but rather really of timing of a release of a paper that had not properly disclosed everything it was," he said.
Whether the research was published to influence the Paris climate talks is a moot point, said Andrew Light, a senior member of the State Department's climate talks negotiating team in 2015. He said the talks had already been underway for about four years when the paper was published and that 188 nations were relying on a tremendous amount of research to support their goal of reducing humans' carbon emissions to slow the warming of the planet. They had also already crafted proposed reductions by the time the research was published, he said.
"I never heard it discussed once, let alone this one NOAA report, discussed in Paris, the run-up to Paris or anything after Paris, so this is really just an incredibly bizarre claim," Light said.
They don't, in some locations. It turns out that some stations adjust downwards.
Why do all adjustments made by 'scientists" only go up
Not that I know of.
except for the medeival warming period. That got colder didn't it?
Why assume anything?
Since MWP also "disappeared" from Micheal Manns Hockey Stick Graph, it I am assuming that southern hemisphere temperatures where "adjusted" downward
Your entire arguement is based on "Appeal to Authority". That is just not good enough anymore.
originally posted by: TiredofControlFreaks
a reply to: Phage
You still haven't explained why ship's data that had a warm bias ended up, in general, being adjusted even warmer.
In essence, the bias correction involved calculating the average difference between collocated buoy and ship SSTs. The average difference globally was −0.12°C, a correction that is applied to the buoy SSTs at every grid cell in ERSST version 4.
originally posted by: yorkshirelad
Why do you deniers concentrate solely on temperature measurements rather than the knock consequences proving that the temperatures seen are real ?
For example the retreat of the vast majority of glaciers, or the poleward drift of flora and fauna, or the altitude change of flora and fauna, or coral bleaching etc etc The changes to flora and fauna are occurring too fast for species to adapt.
Or are you deniers expecting me to believe that the plants and animals of the world have decided to migrate as part of some global tax scam!
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TiredofControlFreaks
either produce K15 or bugger off.
Show that Bates claims fraud and/or manipulation of data, or bugger off.
originally posted by: TiredofControlFreaks
a reply to: Greven
Greven
You don't even no what the Pause is, never mind where it went away or not.
This is the first official response to the story in the Daily mail
www.lse.ac.uk...
The link was posted earlier in this thread
I think that the story in the Daily Mail is kind of irrelevant now that John Bates has posted his own blog. We can read the original and don't need to worry about how some journalist interpreted them.