It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
[Wikipedia]
The project was approved in 2002 by the United States Congress, but Federal funding for the site ended in 2011 under the Obama Administration via amendment to the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, passed on April 14, 2011.[2] The project has had many difficulties and was highly contested by the general public, the Western Shoshone peoples, and many politicians.[3] The Government Accountability Office stated that the closure was for political, not technical or safety reasons.[2]
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: ColdWisdom
Only if you can be, with absolute 100% certainty, sure it won't some day come back.
There should be some way to render it inert cheaply, and that should be a point of emphasis for the DoE.
originally posted by: eluryh22
a reply to: NightFlight
A few years ago I had a short lived fascination with nuclear power.
I encourage anyone that reads this to take it with more than a grain of salt....
But I recall reading about how each new generation of nuclear power plants are able to create power from the used materials from the previous generation of power plants.
My initial reaction is to see if it is at all feasible to reuse/repurpose all of these obsolete or otherwise unwanted radioactive materials.
I say we launch our nuclear waste into space.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: NightFlight
I say we launch our nuclear waste into space.
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: YouSir
Ummm...I agree...on a direct intercept course...with the sun
I am hoping that people are joking when they say that sending nuclear waste into space is an option, if not, this society is in serious trouble.
This of course is futuristic and I hope it is soon achieved.