How to silence an entire block of protestors

a reply to: TrueBrit

And what rights did he take away?

Did he sign legislation making them all stay in the kitchen making sammiches or something?

carry on.... oppps

a reply to: Cancerwarrior

Well, the executive order he signed has to do with preventing US aid from being used to provide ANY family planning to 27million women around the world, so one has to assume, in conjunction with the fact that he is also appointing pro-life judges, that the American female reproductive organ, will shortly become a place he has sway over as well. Not just grabbing this time, but ordering women to bring fetuses to term, every time, no matter whether they want to, whether they are ready to... enforcing sexual morality, and controlling/abusing women in the process. Trump all over.

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Cancerwarrior

He has not made a very good start.

Already taking rights away from women, first thing off the bat, first piece of paper he signed. Does not bode well in the least.

Heres the problem
if the left went out today to protest specific legislation, it would be lost in the noise considering the left has been loudly protesting since the day after the vote. The battles were not chosen, therefore all protests will be just static for awhile..and the longer people protest just on the sheer theory of Trump as president, the weaker and weaker protesting anything becomes.

Imagine the power if people weren't protesting at all since day 1, then Trump signs legislation X..suddenly protests around the country erupt opposing legislation X..100% focus. It would bring tremendous pressure on Trump on that single issue, and make the country, both left and right, really take a minute to consider things from other perspectives and perhaps refine the legislation.
But nope
Its 100% protest on everything for weeks now...which means, if everything is protested, then nothing is.

If I was a conspiracy theorist, I would say that was "their" plan all along...to dull opposition with simple mountains of it...make the opposition weak by making them boring and humiliating.

a reply to: SaturnFX

Well its not as if there is much choice in the matter. You start organising against the government, they pass laws to prevent your protest being effective. You break those laws and the ignorant believe it invalidates the argument. Currently, there is no Congressional or Senatorial support for the protestors, meaning that the street is the only place they can take grievances, and logically speaking, if EVERYTHING is wrong, you protest EVERYTHING. Compromise becomes a dirty word when the government becomes one sided. The people in the streets have no mouthpiece in government, despite being in the majority.

Single issue protests are frankly absurd. They miss more points than they make.

a reply to: TrueBrit

Well, the executive order he signed has to do with preventing US aid from being used to provide ANY family planning to 27million women around the world,

So in reality, he has done nothing to anyones rights. He has defunded America paying for worldwide abortions? If true I'm all for it.

so one has to assume, in conjunction with the fact that he is also appointing pro-life judges, that the American female reproductive organ, will shortly become a place he has sway over as well.

And how does it lead to that assumption? As we used to say in the army, "when you assume, you make an "ass" out of "u" and "me".

Not just grabbing this time, but ordering women to bring fetuses to term, every time, no matter whether they want to, whether they are ready to... enforcing sexual morality, and controlling/abusing women in the process.

LOL OK, Trump is going to personally intervene in womens abortions now.......

My god the reaching by the left is as ridiculous as these "protests" are.

a reply to: Navieko

Such truth that some of their own friends were afraid to tell them they voted for Trump. We all know the basis of this fear. At least those that voted for him do. The protesters apparently never considered that and have become a tool of the media/establishment. No independent thinking!

Deny ignorance.

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Cancerwarrior

He has not made a very good start.

Already taking rights away from women, first thing off the bat, first piece of paper he signed. Does not bode well in the least.

It's a woman's right to have the US Government financially support with US taxpayer dollars international family-planning organizations that provide abortions?

Wow. Your definition of a woman's right is pretty broad.

Utterly ridiculous.

With regard to the OP, excellent video. The left can continue to ignore, rather than try to understand, perspectives like his at their peril. How else does one explain the left's complete and continued routing from the halls of government from a party that only eight years ago everyone was saying was so decimated it would take decades before they recover?

a reply to: TrueBrit

He spoke of a majority, but Mr Trump does not have a majority. He won states, not people.

You know I'm not so certain of that. Hillary and the MSM was caught manipulating the DNC voting process for her to beat Bernie.

I can't simply rule out that they didn't do the same thing for the General.

a reply to: TrueBrit

Sure what you are saying sounds good and was once true, only except that's not happening right now. Its quite clear the "movement" is based on different motives and intentions. And to be frank anyone who doesn't see that needs a reality check. You are quite a smart man but your biased is clearly clouding your judgment.

Heres a clue. Back then the people organically started a movement

But now? I think you're intelligent enough to figure that one out

a reply to: TrueBrit

That was not the "first piece of paper he signed".

The primary purpose of the order appeared to be the elimination of the insurance mandate: This provision of the ACA requires all Americans to have health insurance or pay a tax penalty. The mandate was written into the law, however, so an executive order cannot exactly repeal that provision.

www.salon.com...

Were it "taking rights from women" salon would have written much differently.
And you have the gall to accuse others of "view everything through your partisan attitudes".

Oh and perhaps some education on the us presidential election system is in order. 304-227 was the final tally. Our system is not based on any "popular vote total" despite what the msm would have you believe. It has worked for over 200 years; it is not changing any time soon.

wow huge black dude,
youre a hero in my book.
way to redpill a whole storm of snowflakes.

never seen someone shout down SJWs without a megaphone

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: SaturnFX

Well its not as if there is much choice in the matter. You start organising against the government, they pass laws to prevent your protest being effective. You break those laws and the ignorant believe it invalidates the argument. Currently, there is no Congressional or Senatorial support for the protestors, meaning that the street is the only place they can take grievances, and logically speaking, if EVERYTHING is wrong, you protest EVERYTHING. Compromise becomes a dirty word when the government becomes one sided. The people in the streets have no mouthpiece in government, despite being in the majority.

Single issue protests are frankly absurd. They miss more points than they make.

No congressional or senatorial support? Congress is both the house of reps. And the Senate btw.

Also I read that many like Lewis, McAuliffe and Ryan attended but that's an abbreviated list. That means there is congressional support (both from the house of reps. And the senate.). So your assertion is based on what? Source please.

originally posted by: SaturnFX

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Cancerwarrior

He has not made a very good start.

Already taking rights away from women, first thing off the bat, first piece of paper he signed. Does not bode well in the least.

Heres the problem
if the left went out today to protest specific legislation, it would be lost in the noise considering the left has been loudly protesting since the day after the vote. The battles were not chosen, therefore all protests will be just static for awhile..and the longer people protest just on the sheer theory of Trump as president, the weaker and weaker protesting anything becomes.

Imagine the power if people weren't protesting at all since day 1, then Trump signs legislation X..suddenly protests around the country erupt opposing legislation X..100% focus. It would bring tremendous pressure on Trump on that single issue, and make the country, both left and right, really take a minute to consider things from other perspectives and perhaps refine the legislation.
But nope
Its 100% protest on everything for weeks now...which means, if everything is protested, then nothing is.

If I was a conspiracy theorist, I would say that was "their" plan all along...to dull opposition with simple mountains of it...make the opposition weak by making them boring and humiliating.

Ding ding! We have a winner.

Exactly the point Big Joe was eluding to in the video.

a reply to: TrueBrit

Today, the vast majority of people with far right, extremist, divisive, racist, and even fascist opinions,

Republicans don't think minorities are too stupid to be able to get ID's.
Rather be in the company of fascist than communist, a much more lethal form of government, see the past 100 years

Thanks for the snowflakian divisive rhetoric.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: TrueBrit

That was not the "first piece of paper he signed".

The primary purpose of the order appeared to be the elimination of the insurance mandate: This provision of the ACA requires all Americans to have health insurance or pay a tax penalty. The mandate was written into the law, however, so an executive order cannot exactly repeal that provision.

www.salon.com...

Were it "taking rights from women" salon would have written much differently.
And you have the gall to accuse others of "view everything through your partisan attitudes".

Oh and perhaps some education on the us presidential election system is in order. 304-227 was the final tally. Our system is not based on any "popular vote total" despite what the msm would have you believe. It has worked for over 200 years; it is not changing any time soon.

well said. Many people just don't understand this concept. We are a country of 50 individual states, not one state.
Many states votes wouldn't count in a popular vote due to vast difference in population. We don't want california, New York and a couple other states to always have final say over who is president.
You have to keep it balanced and every state must count. This also prevents millions of ILLEGAL immigrants, a phrase the msm won't use same as Obama wouldn't call terrorists islamic, from swaying OUR election.

It's not that the dems are against foreign influence in our election, that couldn't be further from the truth. No, they feel that is their strongest tactic for winning, at the moment.
Since it didn't work out that way, blame the opposition of being guilty of exactly what you do with ILLEGAL votes. Nice, right?

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Cancerwarrior

He has not made a very good start.

Already taking rights away from women, first thing off the bat, first piece of paper he signed. Does not bode well in the least.

I don't think the word rights means what you think it does. What rights have they lost? What rights does anyone have to American taxpayer dollars? You just proved that SJW's aren't interested in equality, they want supremacy and special privileges.

originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: TrueBrit

He spoke of a majority, but Mr Trump does not have a majority. He won states, not people.

You know I'm not so certain of that. Hillary and the MSM was caught manipulating the DNC voting process for her to beat Bernie.

I can't simply rule out that they didn't do the same thing for the General.

He's already rationalized and buried that deep in his memory where it'll never come up again.

Nice to see a Adult talking to Children.
Good Job Joe.

That woman was telling him that he was 'on a bike' , as if he didn't know that... and what is negative about using a bike for transportation there today? I thought the left wanted us all to ride bikes.