It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Wizard of Oswald

page: 1
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 03:16 PM
link   
A friend of mine says this is the best analysis of what happened in Dallas. I'm youtube challenged till the end of the month, went over the allotted bandwidth here. Has anyone seen this? Any comments?





posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 03:21 PM
link   
It needs to put Allen Dulles smack dab in the middle of it.



posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 03:28 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: RandyMoskovich

Personally, I think Oswald was the lone shooter, and I see nothing 'magic' about the bullet trajectory. The shots were not hard to make, and the gun was quite capable of doing the job.

I have no real idea whats in the video other than it proposes multiple shooters I think.


edit on 19-1-2017 by D8Tee because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 04:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: RandyMoskovich

Personally, I think Oswald was the lone shooter, and I see nothing 'magic' about the bullet trajectory. The shots were not hard to make, and the gun was quite capable of doing the job.

I have no real idea whats in the video other than it proposes multiple shooters I think.

that Oswald must've been lightning fast to get all the way around and shoot him from the front like that.



posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 05:17 PM
link   
a reply to: VinylTyrant


Oswald must've been lightning fast to get all the way around and shoot him from the front like that.


What evidence indicates that he was shot from the front?



posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 05:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee
What evidence indicates that he was shot from the front?

Here's what every person who values the truth wants to see. It's "the event" from a true historical context via actual news and archival footage. It will blow your mind and answer some of your questions.

A unique & EPIC work that sources itself through documentary footage. Imo it should be shown and taught in high school.


edit on 19-1-2017 by The GUT because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 05:38 PM
link   
a reply to: The GUT
Youtube is blocked for me right now, ISP does that when I use too much data.



posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 05:40 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

Keep it on your list. It's an important work.



posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 06:29 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

Yep Oswald made the improbable shot on
the President all by his lonesome because
that's what white young family men do in this country for the elite.
And the mafia ....And Lyndon Johnson and
the good ol boys down in Texas. After getting married and having a baby girl. They just
seem to lose their gaw damn minds.

Way to often if you ask me. But you know
What they say. If it works don't fix it.

No such thing as patsies in this world and
all leaders are great people too.

Just love em.



posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 06:49 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs


the good ol boys down in Texas. After getting married and having a baby girl. They just
seem to lose their gaw damn minds.

Oswald was hardly your typical American. How many good old boys defected to the USSR for a couple years, meet and marry their wife there, and return to the USA?



posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 06:56 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

That Oswald was a "sheep-dipped" patsy seems to bear investigative fruit. Oswald was also stationed in Japan where some of the more serious MK-ULTRA test projects were going on too.

You have a good point about him defecting to Russia, but follow it out. I think you will be surprised and intrigued.


Oswald, The Sheep Dipped Patsy


edit on 19-1-2017 by The GUT because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 07:38 PM
link   
a reply to: The GUT
I'm aware of the Oswald backstory, was more interested in why people think there was more than one shooter.



posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 10:53 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

You know, at least Oswald was an
american. Documented with no doubt.
Which is more than anyone can say
about the current ? in office. But you're
really live'n in a hunky dory world of
peaches and cream sport'n rose colored
glasses if you believe the official version
of all the Kennedy bump offs.

Get real for gawds sake.



posted on Jan, 19 2017 @ 10:56 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs


But you're
really live'n in a hunky dory world of
peaches and cream sport'n rose colored
glasses if you believe the official version
of all the Kennedy bump offs.

Get real for gawds sake.


Was hoping for proof of more than one shooter other than 'back and to the left'.
edit on 19-1-2017 by D8Tee because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 09:04 AM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

Look up the picture of the bullet flying over
that flys over the Presidents head.
It's absolute proof of four shots minimum.
Four shots destroys the lone gunman. And
with todays higher tech you can see the
Photographic evidence for yourself. Even
the congressional assassination committee
came to the conclusion that Kennedy was
the victim of a conspiracy. So dude, you want
proof? Do some research, there's plenty of it
Out there amigo.
edit on Ram12017v08201700000029 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 12:09 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs


Four shots destroys the lone gunman.

The acoustic thing has been debunked on many levels.


Look up the picture of the bullet flying over
that flys over the Presidents head.

Do you have a link?



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 12:40 PM
link   
"I see nothing 'magic' about the bullet trajectory"
"The shots were not hard to make"
"The gun was quite capable of doing the job"

I can't waste my time with this type of stupidity. Like they said, do some research.



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 12:44 PM
link   
a reply to: spiritualarchitect


"The shots were not hard to make"

75 yards at a target moving a constant rate of speed? That is not a hard shot to make. Ever shot a gun before?


I see nothing 'magic' about the bullet trajectory

I stand behind that statement 100 percent.
edit on 20-1-2017 by D8Tee because: (no reason given)



"The gun was quite capable of doing the job"

You tell me, what gives you the idea that weapon was not up to task? Let me guess, the price? Here, educate yourself.
Carcano Rifle - Shooting it Today


Experience with our test rifle aside, mechanically the rifle should work at that level of performance. For accuracy, our test rifle was well within the tolerances that were used by the Warren Commission. They judged that the rifle was “very accurate,” and could group three shots into 3-5 inches at 100 yards. Our test rifle did a little better than this with modern, recent-manufacture, factory ammo, about 1.4 inches at 50 yards.




I can't waste my time with this type of stupidity. Like they said, do some research.

Done plenty, on both sides.
edit on 20-1-2017 by D8Tee because: (no reason given)

edit on 20-1-2017 by D8Tee because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

Come on just search it on you tube
My fellow member.

Done plenty on both sides?
Now you're just lying.
edit on Rpm12017v01201700000054 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join