It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Christopher Steele - Intelligence Sources vouch for his credibility

page: 4
16
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 14 2017 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: spiritualzombie

But can you prove the "report" came from the "firm" or from Steele ?





posted on Jan, 14 2017 @ 01:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords
Even so-called "reputable" people can have an unholy agenda, especially if there are lots of $$$, promises, and other perks associated with it.

Hell, Steele, himself, may have been the one that engaged in the weirdness, and maybe he is being forced to make such accusations because HE is the one being blackmailed to do so.

Reputations rise and reputations can fall. He may be the sleazy weirdo being blackmailed for all we know. If anybody knows how to use such tactics, it would be the ________ and the ______.



This is EXACTLY the difference between these intel reports and all the bogus right-wing conspiracies which are all based in IMAGINATION. Stop imagining things, and just take the report for what it is. You don't have to believe. The author himself doesn't even necessarily belief all the information he gathered. Stop with the invented excuses and invented connections. The agenda was quite clear. This is what he was hired to do, and this is what he delivered.

Try to use a little critical thinking. Disregard the report if you need to. But don't make sh#t up. There's no need to.



posted on Jan, 14 2017 @ 01:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: spiritualzombie
But can you prove the "report" came from the "firm" or from Steele ?

Stop playing stupid... You're kind of doing this right now...

edit on 14-1-2017 by spiritualzombie because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 14 2017 @ 02:21 PM
link   
a reply to: spiritualzombie

As I thought.

No proof anywhere.






posted on Jan, 14 2017 @ 04:22 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

No one has claimed to have proof. Nobody is talking about proof. Proof is not the subject. It's a report and the credibility of the person who wrote it.



new topics

top topics
 
16
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join