It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama Signs Act - Fake News Is Now Illegal Just Deem It Foreign Propaganda

page: 10
35
<< 7  8  9    11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 02:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: imitator

originally posted by: Greggers

The problem is, enough people would know what they were looking at to compromise national security. And if they did release that information, you'd simply accuse them of fabricating it.

A logfile is simple enough to fake.


Probably is fabricated logfiles, they had plenty of time to tweak the IP stacks and networking protocols. Plus the fact CrowdStrike, Inc. is located in liberal central California with BIG investor backing from China etc.... bet Soros is in on it too.


Your link www.nbcnews.com... has been producing disinformation throughout the presidential campaign. I'd say it's highly likely Cozy Bear lives in California or China.... anyone can smell it's BS propaganda.

I predict Obama's war on information will be a short one.


Why would they fabricate a logfile they haven't revealed? Have you bothered to think this through at all?

Like I said, there is nothing they could offer that would make you believe them.




posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 02:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Greggers

Which one? I've been cranking out mega-threads like hotcakes since my return this year.


So that's what you're calling it...



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 02:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: Greggers

Where does it say anything is being banned?


Are you serious?... You want to play semantics now?...


Not playing semantics. Seriously asking what's being banned.





Prominent republicans, or prominent RINOs? When someone calls himself/herself republican but keeps backing progressive bills and ideas that person is not a republican.

There is no such thing as a RINO, or a DINO. If they are a member of the party, they are of that party.

If you don't like the politicians who have been backed by the Republican party infrastructure, perhaps you should go find yourself a new party.




edit on 27-12-2016 by Greggers because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 02:25 AM
link   



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 02:31 AM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

His entire political career has been as a Republican.

If you want to resort to childish name calling by calling him a rink, that's up to you, but there were other Republican's who co-signed this bill as well.

No doubt they're rino's too, right?

How convenient.



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 02:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958



And the fact is the FCC is controlled by the CIA


No it's not.

Why the lies?



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 02:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

His entire political career has been as a Republican.





posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 02:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

His entire political career has been as a Republican.




::Insert out of context picture here::



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 02:46 AM
link   



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 02:53 AM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

University 1998:

Adam Kinzinger was elected to the McLean County Board as a Sophomore at Illinois State University in 1998 beating a 12 year incumbent Democrat.

web.archive.org...://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2009/03/03/adam-kinzinger-for-illinois-11th-hero-patriot

Interned for Peter Fitzgerald after that..
web.archive.org...://cas.illinoisstate.edu/pol/about/kinzingeraward.shtml

Ran as a Republican House of Representatives seat in 2010..
LINK

And has been there ever since.



edit on 27/12/16 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 03:01 AM
link   



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 03:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Greggers

I thought you guys were talking about Trump.



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 04:25 AM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse


I also wonder... How many foreign government's and foreign government officials has the United States hacked?... I guess the U.S. influenced the elections in Germany, alongside all of Europe, Russia itself, China, etc, etc...


Exactly. As I point out in this thread, turnabout is fair play:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Do you deny that the United States spies on its friends as well as enemies? Do you deny that the United States has used every means at its disposal to influence the internal affairs of other countries? Do you think Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is a useless idiot incapable of doing the sorts of things that American Presidents have been doing since Teddy Roosevelt? Thinking that the Russians are incapable of doing something the Americans do all the time is pure Russophobia.



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 04:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Greggers

I thought you guys were talking about Trump.


That's because you don't exert much of an effort to understand what other people are saying. That's why we get so frustrated when we try to discuss things on those massive video and meme fests you call threads.
edit on 27-12-2016 by DJW001 because: Edit to correct typo.



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 08:57 AM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I have the same questions. Who are the people who decide? I am really curious as to why this is such a broad statement.



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 08:59 AM
link   
Hmmm, interesting move.

So basically the Democrats just handed the Republicans the ability to call outlets they disagree with propaganda and ban it?

Am i understanding this right?



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 09:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Greggers

I thought you guys were talking about Trump.


We weren't.



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 09:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: XTexan
Hmmm, interesting move.

So basically the Democrats just handed the Republicans the ability to call outlets they disagree with propaganda and ban it?

Am i understanding this right?


No.



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 09:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Greggers

Thanks for the reply, although it was short.

What requirements must be met to label something as "foreign propaganda"? Does it only apply to state sponsored sources? Or if, hypothetically, Putin purchased 51% of CNN could they then deem that as foreign propaganda? Or can they just say, "The US government says "X" and VICE says "Y", therefore VICE is spouting foreign propaganda"?

I don't think I like this law, regardless of who is in charge.



posted on Dec, 27 2016 @ 09:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: XTexan
a reply to: Greggers

Thanks for the reply, although it was short.

What requirements must be met to label something as "foreign propaganda"? Does it only apply to state sponsored sources? Or if, hypothetically, Putin purchased 51% of CNN could they then deem that as foreign propaganda? Or can they just say, "The US government says "X" and VICE says "Y", therefore VICE is spouting foreign propaganda"?

I don't think I like this law, regardless of who is in charge.


Nothing is being banned.

You can publish fake news all day, everyday.

Any law that circumvents Freedom of the Press would be nuked by the SCOTUS anyway -- which is not what this law does.
edit on 27-12-2016 by Greggers because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
35
<< 7  8  9    11 >>

log in

join