It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Wolfenz
So your saying ...... you dont see an Anomaly here ?
what is Circled
and what are the ODDs of that ?
from what i see...
It looks uncanny familiar with this MAN MADE Mound
Named Tepe in Malik Shah Iran
Here on Earth ..
originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: enjoylife
NASA, masters at bolstering public support for their missions.
Doctor some images, leak 'em to the public and then deny everything
they wanted you to see in the first place is even there. Because it isn't.
It's the classic bait and switch that dangles false evidence in regards to
what men want more than anything. Proof of any gods/aliens or just
anything. Lizards, snake, stone, anything that leads men away from
belief in the one true Creator. Surely not all of you are so ignorant
that you can't see this is what NASA is doing?
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: Wolfenz
So your saying ...... you dont see an Anomaly here ?
what is Circled
I see them, but are they really anomalies? What's anomalous about them? Their positions?
and what are the ODDs of that ?
To me, odds have nothing to do with a thing being natural or not, as we do not know the processes involved in creating those things and so have no way of calculating any odds about it.
from what i see...
It looks uncanny familiar with this MAN MADE Mound
Named Tepe in Malik Shah Iran
Here on Earth ..
It does, but from what I remember about that Tepe it was only partially man-made, the lower part is natural. Also, even if it was completely man-made, when you look at the area around it you can see that it's the only formation like that in that area, and that it's relatively low.
The "face" on Cydonia is in an area full of formations like that (although with different shapes) that appear to have more or less the same height, so the "face" doesn't look out of place in that area.
The "face" on Cydonia is in an area full of formations like that (although with different shapes) that appear to have more or less the same height, so the "face" doesn't look out of place in that area
originally posted by: Wolfenz
Well I speak of Anomalies because these type Objects something like markers are going around
this Mound ... and its not Really exactly the right Equal Distance, but pretty close , A Possible land slide Perhaps , from a possible destruction of some kind "quake" a rush of water etc..
it shows in legit NASA Photos ..
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: Wolfenz
Well I speak of Anomalies because these type Objects something like markers are going around
this Mound ... and its not Really exactly the right Equal Distance, but pretty close , A Possible land slide Perhaps , from a possible destruction of some kind "quake" a rush of water etc..
The fact that they are not evenly spaced and what appears to be the edge of a slightly different ground makes me think that they may really be the result of the erosion of the "face", maybe larger blocks that fell down the slopes.
it shows in legit NASA Photos ..
I know it does, I recognise the photo you posted.
And although we can't really rule out intelligent intervention I don't see any reason to give intelligent intervention a higher probability of being the right answer than to natural geological processes, similar to those we know on the Earth.
know it does, I recognise the photo you posted.
And although we can't really rule out intelligent intervention I don't see any reason to give intelligent intervention a higher probability of being the right answer than to natural geological processes, similar to those we know on the Earth.
originally posted by: Ectoplasm8
originally posted by: Wolfenz
What about all of the other similar "anomalies" I've circled in yellow? This is just in the tight shot you posted, I'm sure a wider one would show many more.
Obviously these aren't markers, they're just naturally occurring.
originally posted by: charlyv
Would it not be great if in the sunset years of these missions, if the rovers could be tasked with re-tracing their paths and investigating some of the most controversial objects that we have all seen and wondered about. I understand that the missions are tasked with a much more important master plan of exploration, but there are certainly a few objects, and we all know what they are, that really need to be manipulated and detail scanned for answers to exactly what they are, and of course, what they are not.
The basic premise was that if this is is a city then it was buried in a cataclysmic flood probably caused by the same destructive impact which may have created both the Valles Marineras were Mars seem's to have nearly been split in two and the massive Olympus Monze which may have been the last gasp of the planet's core after it was impacted and disrupted entirely by the force of that impact with left one hemisphere of mars far more devastated than the other hemisphere.
This floor of water or even mud then froze as the atmosphere had been almost entirely blasted away in this scenario which is at odd's with NASA's current slow depletion by solar wind erosion of MARS atmosphere and is more in line with the planet's core having been killed by a massive impact with the subsequent loss of it's magnetosphere as well as the already massive atmospheric depletion caused by this event.
Valles Marineris stretches east-west just below the Martian equator. It starts in the west in the Noctis Labyrinthus, a system of maze-like valleys and canyons, and stretches around 20 percent of the planet to the chaotic terrain near the Chryse Planitia basin. The canyon system contains a number of different features that give clues to its formation. Collapse pits created by rushing water eating away at the land, massive floods, and seeping along canyon walls all point to water just at or beneath the surface at some point in the Martian history. Cracks in the crust, cliffs and walls, and landslides also exist along the expanse of Valles Marineris.
Cydonia lies in the planet's northern hemisphere in a transitional zone between the heavily cratered regions to the south and relatively smooth plains to the north. Some planetologists believe that the northern plains may once have been ocean beds[8] and that Cydonia may once have been a coastal zone.[
originally posted by: Wolfenz
why would if matter if they are evenly spaced ... that the point im making..
and if they were ... what would happen .. ?
No.
Maybe larger Block falling down the Slope ???
are you kidding me!
Again what are the Ratio ( odds ) of Rocks falling Down the Slope making a Geometric Pattern around the Mound
it shows in legit NASA Photos ..
It would be Nice if they show these markers a litter closer
My Guess is they could be left over results from a Cad Program , Morphing Program , in something like Photoshop ,...
I wonder , Has Anybody questioned NASA about those Dot "Markers " ?
originally posted by: LABTECH767
So there are a lot of very strong vested interest's in simply not letting this potential truth be revealed also of note the Video had a very good argument about how JPL would more or less go out of business if such previous advanced civilization could be proven to have existed regardless of whether it be of human or non human origin.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: Wolfenz
why would if matter if they are evenly spaced ... that the point im making..
and if they were ... what would happen .. ?
If they were evenly spaced then I would give the artificial possibility more "weight".
No.
Maybe larger Block falling down the Slope ???
are you kidding me!
Again what are the Ratio ( odds ) of Rocks falling Down the Slope making a Geometric Pattern around the Mound
That depends in part of the shape of the mound. A rock rolling down hill would get up to a specific speed, related to the angle of the slope and how high up that sloped the rock started rolling down. If the slope has the same angle all around the mound and there's a layer at a specific altitude from which is more likely that rocks will roll down hill then the odds of all rocks stopping at more or less the same distance from the mound are higher than if the mound had different slope angles in different places.
it shows in legit NASA Photos ..
Why that obsession with it being a legit NASA photo? I don't remember anyone saying it wasn't.
It would be Nice if they show these markers a litter closer
Wish granted.
This way we can see that they are not boulders that rolled down hill.
My Guess is they could be left over results from a Cad Program , Morphing Program , in something like Photoshop ,...
Have you done anything like that in one of those programs? I ask because I don't see any need for markers in any of those programs, at least markers that will appear in the final image.
I wonder , Has Anybody questioned NASA about those Dot "Markers " ?
I only know I haven't.
No.
Maybe larger Block falling down the Slope ???
are you kidding me!
it shows in legit NASA Photos ..
Why that obsession with it being a legit NASA photo? I don't remember anyone saying it wasn't.
My Guess is they could be left over results from a Cad Program , Morphing Program , in something like Photoshop ,... ////
Have you done anything like that in one of those programs? I ask because I don't see any need for markers in any of those programs, at least markers that will appear in the final image.