It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: muzzleflash
If it were me choosing I'd invest all of that $ into cruise missiles, radar and satellite systems, and jamming equipment.
originally posted by: mbkennel
originally posted by: muzzleflash
If it were me choosing I'd invest all of that $ into cruise missiles, radar and satellite systems, and jamming equipment.
And how will you get those cruise missiles, radar, and jamming equipment close enough to the action?
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Barnalby
It's going to depend on which you want more, reliable aircraft that you can use, or problem plagued aircraft that may or may not work.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: muzzleflash
So you'd keep 60 year old aircraft flying until what, they're completely unable to fly any more before you start replacing them?
Your missiles and jammers aren't going to just fly there all on their own. And it would be sort of nice to get the platforms carrying them back again.