It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: playswithmachines
Inside the dielectric, charges around the atoms move in response to the applied voltage gradient. They are simply restrained by the atomic structure to only move a small distance; that is what keeps the dielectric from acting as a conductor.
This movement of charge, even to such a small degree, is a current. That current produces a magnetic field orthogonal to it. If the geometry of the electric and magnetic flux currents is in the proper configuration, a gravitational current is produced as well. According to Einstein, a gravitational current will affect observed time too. All from the action of a voltage on a properly-shaped dielectric.
My research is into using lower voltages in semiconductors materials, properly controlled to provide the correct geometries to the fields. A downburst dissipating as it approached the surface would provide the geometry (or a close facsimile) and ions in that downburst could produce a current. Compared to that produced by a dielectric, the effects of an active current would be thousands of times greater.
the new aether theory from some professor i cant remember
In my mind we have a triangle of forces, at least in these 3 dimensions we are aware of. I believe charge to be trans-dimensional, maybe magnetic flux lines are as well.
And i figure that there is a lot more behind the CCD than just taking pictures.
Well at least we can discuss this like civilised folks Redneck, most peeps here bite my head off when i mention something, LOL
i tried running the dielectric experiments with magnetic fields of 2T in all axes and i saw no difference, but then i may have had the geometry wrong.
That book disclosed a new law of electrodynamics, wholly supported by empirical evidence, a law that was consistent with the Lorentz force law as applied to electron current flow in closed circuits but one that allowed unification with the theory of gravity. It was explained that the law gave scope for generating forces in breach of Newton's Third Law. That could only mean that the aether could assert or absorb force and the book delved into the structure of that aether to show how it put action into quantum mechanics and provided a quantum theory of gravitation by incorporating gravitons having a mass-energy of 2.587 GeV, thereby allowing G, the constant of gravitation to be derived by pure theory. Empirical evidence was referenced to show that such gravitons do exist. The case presented was aimed at showing that Einstein's Theory of Relativity had been overtaken by something better, something that meant revival of the aether theme, but in a modernized form.
Ever enthusiastic, Marinov aroused our interest by demonstrating odd effects concerning setting things in motion, using magnets and electrical currents, but I saw nothing in his proposals that warranted a commercial interest. Over the years, Marinov had taken to heart what I had been advocating in my book Physics without Einstein concerning the fallacies of the conventional form of electrodynamic law, as indeed had Professor Pappas. Indeed, both Marinov and Pappas made their own contributions in challenging The Lorentz force law. This is a subject which relates to the way in which electric motors work and it has implications where setting up forces as between matter and aether are concerned. This is where Newton's Third Law, the balance of action and reaction, enters into the picture, the issue being the question of whether we can set up forces on a machine by which it pushes against the aether to develop drive power. Forces asserted between the aether and a machine can further imply transfer of energy from the aether to the machine, a fascinating prospect and one which comes into perspective once we see scope for challenging, not just the Lorentz force law, but the earlier Ampere form of law.
So it is here that we come to the theme of prime importance. It is a topic I have discussed from my perspective elsewhere in these web pages, but I am here concentrating attention on the Marinov motor theme. Both Pappas and Marinov became absolutely convinced that the Lorentz force law is incorrect, as applied to interactions involving an unclosed electrical circuit, meaning, for example, one where the action arises from current flow around a circuit path is that of current flow through wire in one circuit segment and that of displacement current through the aether in a another segment of that circuit. If action balances reaction as between current in the different parts of that circuit, then action and reaction forces are asserted between matter and aether and that means that one can devise a machine that moves itself by pushing against the aether.
originally posted by: Phage
How about that, consumer grade "science" got it wrong. Again.
“The editing on this was horrendous,” Cerveny told The Washington Post. “I was really upset when I saw this.”
So not only is the Bermuda Triangle mystery not solved, but the guy who supposedly did the solving also didn’t even mean to suggest that it was.
My biggest issue is I am self-funded and until April of this year, I did not possess a degree... all self-taught. That makes it very difficult to be taken seriously in scientific circles. Of course, it also means you did not get taught about that box you're apparently supposed to do all your thinking in.
I must have missed class that day. I never learned about this box.