It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: ketsuko
The status quo on steroids terrifies me. I might get it either way, but one way I know leads to it. Therefore I can't choose Hillary.
A chance for something better, or even delaying these bastards is worth the risk of the unknown.
If the only choice is Russian Roulette or a fully loaded gun, I'll take Russian Roulette.
I may die with either option, but at least with one there's a chance of a future.
originally posted by: Ohanka
Trump the non-interventionist.
Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump was saying what a lot of Americans were probably thinking following the latest terror attack when he said it is time to declare war on the Islamic State.
“I would,” Trump said when asked on Fox News shortly after the attack if he would seek a declaration of war on ISIS. “This is war. If you look at it, this is war.”
originally posted by: dragonridrSpeaking of russia only one candidate threatened Russia with going to war. Hillary made a direct threat to start world War 3 bottom line is that's dangerous now matter how you look at it.
originally posted by: Puppylove
originally posted by: AlienView
The Democrats keep pushing their political negative agenda by trying to paint Trump as an egotistical maniac who loves war.
For arguments sake let's pretend that it's a legitimate worry.
They counter that with Hillary who has already demonstrate those exact traits with actual actions?
So we're to elect Hillary over Trump because he might do the very things Hillary has already demonstrated a propensity for.
With Trump we get a maybe. With Hillary I've already seen what she's like with a political position and found her highly unworthy to hold one, especially one involving national security.
"Don't elect this candidate because they "might" do the very same thing our candidate has already shown she "will" do and "has" done before." It's absurd logic.
Speaking of russia only one candidate threatened Russia with going to war.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: mkultra11
No it's not. Some people just believe fairy tails. The rest of us grow up and find our own way and our own opinions. I've got mine.
Donald is stupid and racist and unfit to be president and the future of our country cannot be put in that maniacs hands EVER.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Throes
Considering that Hilary was a part of a regime which helped form ISIS, I'd say she's worse.
Please stop with that lie; Trump doesn't even tell it any more.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: mkultra11
originally posted by: Throes
Considering that Hilary was a part of a regime which helped form ISIS, I'd say she's worse.
Yes and the fact that her foreign policy decisions directly caused the worldwide refugee crisis.
Yes, it had absolutely nothing to do with civil war in Syria, Sudan, Yemen....
originally posted by: WeRpeons
a reply to: AlienView
Trump hands down...with just taking into consideration three quotes that came from the horses mouth.
(1) 'If We Have [Nuclear Weapons], Why Can't We Use Them?"
(2) “I’m good at war,” he said. “I’ve had a lot of wars of my own. I’m really good at war. I love war in a certain way, but
only when we win.”
(3) “I would bring back waterboarding and I'd bring back a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding."