Who is more Dangerous, Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton ?

a reply to: Puppylove

I'm an it? Really you_______________!

a reply to: Sillyolme

It'd be easier to recognize you as a real person if you'd demonstrate an even slightly realistic portrayal of Hillary or reality. She's a dirty politician at absolute best, just like the rest of them.

To hear you talk about her, you'd think she was a #ing Saint.

a reply to: mkultra11

No it's not. Some people just believe fairy tails. The rest of us grow up and find our own way and our own opinions. I've got mine.
Donald is stupid and racist and unfit to be president and the future of our country cannot be put in that maniacs hands EVER.

a reply to: Puppylove

I am voting for Hillary. She's the only one running that has the capability to run the country.
She's got the experience, she's been doing this since the 70s.
While Trump was getting laid in the back room at studio 54 she was making education available to disabled students in the Boston area .
While Trump was ruining contractors by.not paying them for the work they did Hillary was working on a plan to bring health insurance to millions of children. There are millions today who are insured due to her efforts.
While the dog was collecting cash not due him for repairs from the 911attacks Hillary was making sure that the cash was there. Hillary was making sure that first responders damaged by poisonous smoke got the healthcare they needed until this very day those funds are available for them.
While Trump bankrupted his casinos Hillary was working with Russia to reduce arms.

Gee I don't know about you but the choice seems pretty damn clear to me.
So the next time you feel like engaging me like I'm an IT, like I'm not real you remember that puppy.

Clinton is more dangerous because she has a vast amount of political experience, she has huge political influence, and she actually knows what she's doing.

Trump would be an absolute pussycat by comparison. Definitely the safer option!

Clinton the rabid warmonger.

Trump the non-interventionist.

Well, Trump is far more dangerous to the status quo and the future domination of the military industrial complex.

Hillary is a threat to continued life on this planet if her reckless calls for war with Russia are anything to go by.

a reply to: Sillyolme

So you have not a single bad thing to say about Hillary? That's all you need to do, recognize and say ONE bad thing about her. Portray her as a human and not some saintly divine being NO ONE will ever buy.

If you can demonstrate some ability to describe a humanizing fault of Hillary, then THEN you might be more than a shill.

There is nothing I support that I'm so blinded I'm incapable or unwilling to recognize or concede faults in.

Your inability to do so, makes nothing you say worth considering, as you clearly have blinders on and exist 100% as a propaganda machine.

So once again, ONE BIG THING you really dislike about Hillary or go home.

a reply to: AlienView

One must be beany brain puppet to consider Trump a danger, or ignore Hillary being one.

originally posted by: AceWombat04
The net sum of these two posts...

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: AlienView

Who do I think is more dangerous? Let's take a look at the big picture to see if anything is going to really change, shall we...

Donald Trump: vows US military build-up, proposing more troops, ships, warplanes

Hillary Clinton: We should maintain the best-trained, best-equipped, and strongest military the world has ever known.nnn

originally posted by: VictorVonDoom
The danger doesn't come from the Presidency. The danger comes from non-government organizations.

ALEC writes laws favorable to large corporations, then has lawmakers push them through Congress.

The CFR dictates US foreign policy.

The Federal Reserve controls the economy.

The occupant of the office of President can either play ball or get marginalized. If they become a problem, they can be dealt with.

... among many other reasons, are why I can't feel at peace with my conscience voting for either of them.

They may appear to present a stark distinction between one another, but they both advocate and say they hope for enough that is either the same, or just different flavors of things I can't personally support, that for me it makes little difference in terms of the, "Could I sleep at night after voting for them?" factor.

Who's more dangerous? I don't know. I can't predict the future. Neither is safe enough for me to sleep at night after voting for them personally.

Peace.

Ya know, I can't get behind this "all about ME" BS.

"My conscience"? Really?

How is your conscience gonna feel if things get worse because you just rolled over and hit snooze?

Not singling you out, I have problems with "it's all the same coin", "TPTB" ,"your vote don't count anyway" and "there are others in the race, 3rd party!" people too.

These people are basically saying that they don't deserve the right to vote.

Whaaaaa, they're both so bad!

There are only 2 choices come Nov. Whatever happened to "fight the good fight"?

At least go down swinging and choose wisely.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Then the left has successfully dumbed you down to believe that all if Hillary's scandals are fairytales and Trump is a racist. You can have your manufactured and spoon fed opinion.

Considering that Hilary was a part of a regime which helped form ISIS, I'd say she's worse.

originally posted by: Throes
Considering that Hilary was a part of a regime which helped form ISIS, I'd say she's worse.

Yes and the fact that her foreign policy decisions directly caused the worldwide refugee crisis.

a reply to: burgerbuddy

I'd give you more credence if you didn't include voting third party as a negative in your rant.

If you consider both candidates for republican and democratic to be bad candidates for different reasons, and don't honestly believe one is more harmful for the country than the other, then voting for either is doing nothing but backing someone you don't support.

At least voting third party, if you truly believe they are a better candidate is both still voting, and still trying to make a difference. If you truly believe voting matters and have power than anyone voting to make a difference for what they think is the better should have your support. If voting has power like you believe, then if enough people turn away from the two parties and go third, it can make a difference to better the country.

Either you believe in voting or you don't, but if you do, you're simply an asshole if you'll deny people choosing to vote how they best think they can push to better this country.

As for fighting the good fight, accepting two bad choices is anything but fighting the good fight, it's acceptance of the bad choices they've provided for you. You're not fighting # by doing that, all you're doing is being a good pet pushing the red or blue button for your gruel.

The age old question .......a giant douche or a turd sandwich.

a reply to: AlienView

Easy. Don is. He's the Anti-Christ come to sway the masses with his amazing speech rhetoric (like Adolf Hitler did). All will fall under his spell as "Im the ONLY ONE WHO CAN GET US OUTTA THIS. I KNOW MORE THAN THE GENERALS DO"...rings like funeral bells...

The world as we know it will end...and most of the life on it...all from ticking off some nut-case-finger-on-the-button foreign leader with all 10 fingers on as many buttons...because "Tricky Trump's" big mouth is gonna get us all killed.

*And NO I dont support "Polyestor-Polly" either. But with "Mr. T.?" The end will just come sooner and faster and will be more complete.

Might as well just vote Pee Wee Herman in....

*Sorry Kids. Im American, thats my opinion. Keeps yours. Thats fine. MS

a reply to: Ohanka

Trump the non-interventionist.

Have you paid any attention to what he has actually says? He has a secret plan to destroy ISIS, remember? How do you suppose he plans to do it? Buy them all a new car? Why would he want to increase military spending? And how can you forget "we should just take their oil?"

originally posted by: mkultra11

originally posted by: Throes
Considering that Hilary was a part of a regime which helped form ISIS, I'd say she's worse.

Yes and the fact that her foreign policy decisions directly caused the worldwide refugee crisis.

Yes, it had absolutely nothing to do with civil war in Syria, Sudan, Yemen....

originally posted by: Throes
Considering that Hilary was a part of a regime which helped form ISIS, I'd say she's worse.

Please stop with that lie; Trump doesn't even tell it any more.

originally posted by: Throes
Considering that Hilary was a part of a regime which helped form ISIS

No. ISIS was formed in 1999. At that time Bill Clinton was POTUS, and Hillary was only First Lady.

My current synopsis is follows:

Clinton: SSDD (i.e. status quo)

Trump: WTF (i.e. random, unpredictable, chaotic)

Pick yer poison.