It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neoholographic
a reply to: Noinden
You said:
Guess what those are also not compleatly understood, yet they happen.
BINGO LOL!!!
You have just said what I have been saying the entire post. Again, you said:
b) You don't believe in evolution, any more than you believe in thermodynamics, kinetics, SN1 and SN2 mechanisms, and Gravity. Guess what those are also not compleatly understood, yet they happen.
THOSE AREN'T COMPLETELY UNDERSTOOD!
Of course evolution isn't completely understood because we don't know the Origin of Life. It's even worse with evolution because Darwinist don't even know the Origin of Evolution when they say evolution must have life.
This is just a belief.
Without the orgin of life, evolution is an incomplete theory because evolution depends on life for it's very existence. I don't know why Darwinist have this fantasy about a line that separates evolution from the origin of life when you say it's existence depends on life.
At least with gravity there's theories about it's origins but with evolution there's no such thing and that's because evolution is tied to the origin of life.
originally posted by: Cypress
originally posted by: neoholographic
a reply to: Noinden
You said:
Guess what those are also not compleatly understood, yet they happen.
BINGO LOL!!!
You have just said what I have been saying the entire post. Again, you said:
b) You don't believe in evolution, any more than you believe in thermodynamics, kinetics, SN1 and SN2 mechanisms, and Gravity. Guess what those are also not compleatly understood, yet they happen.
THOSE AREN'T COMPLETELY UNDERSTOOD!
Of course evolution isn't completely understood because we don't know the Origin of Life. It's even worse with evolution because Darwinist don't even know the Origin of Evolution when they say evolution must have life.
This is just a belief.
Without the orgin of life, evolution is an incomplete theory because evolution depends on life for it's very existence. I don't know why Darwinist have this fantasy about a line that separates evolution from the origin of life when you say it's existence depends on life.
At least with gravity there's theories about it's origins but with evolution there's no such thing and that's because evolution is tied to the origin of life.
Umm the origin of evolution is when genetic material is transfered from one generation the next... Haven't you been told where babies come from?
You can't know the origin of evolution without knowing the origin of life.
originally posted by: neoholographic
Tell me, where did Evolution originate and how or did it just magically pop into existence?
Evolution is a physical process. Where did it originate? If Evolution can't exist without life, how can you separate it from the Origin of Life?
In earth science, erosion is the action of surface processes (such as water flow or wind) that remove soil, rock, or dissolved material from one location on the Earth's crust, then transport it away to another location.[1] The particulate breakdown of rock or soil into clastic sediment is referred to as physical or mechanical erosion; this contrasts with chemical erosion, where soil or rock material is removed from an area by its dissolving into a solvent (typically water), followed by the flow away of that solution. Eroded sediment or solutes may be transported just a few millimetres, or for thousands of kilometres.
Natural rates of erosion are controlled by the action of geomorphic drivers, such as rainfall; bedrock wear in rivers; coastal erosion by the sea and waves; glacial plucking, abrasion, and scour; areal flooding; wind abrasion; groundwater processes; and mass movement processes in steep landscapes like landslides and debris flows. The rates at which such processes act control how fast a surface is eroded. Typically, physical erosion proceeds fastest on steeply sloping surfaces, and rates may also be sensitive to some climatically-controlled properties including amounts of water supplied (e.g., by rain), storminess, wind speed, wave fetch, or atmospheric temperature (especially for some ice-related processes). Feedbacks are also possible between rates of erosion and the amount of eroded material that is already carried by, for example, a river or glacier.[2][3] Processes of erosion that produce sediment or solutes from a place contrast with those of deposition, which control the arrival and emplacement of material at a new location.[1]