Is it just me?
I have the feeling that an tragic event, a tragic crime is used to spread the "IS" terror fear.
Even the MSM news here in germany is a little bit schizophrenic.
First they report that nobody really knows the motives of Bouhlel, including the french investigators, police. In the next sentence they try to spin
everything in the "IS" direction. Then again they report and show relatives of Bouhlel that say again and again that he never was a religious person,
that he was drinking alcohol and eating pork meat. That he had problems with his wife and the three kids, problems with the job and mental
Why are the coming up with the sms "evidence" that late? They had his body, his wallet and his phone seconds after the rampage occured. And what´s
that for a message?
'Bring more weapons… It's good. I have the equipment'
Good to use as "evidence" against him later, but doesn´t make sense when someone will go on a rampage with his truck, reckoning to get killed.
Really: I start my truck now, will mow down a lot of innocent people in some seconds, so come guys, and bring some more weapons... ???
And which equipment? A handgun, some alleged bigger weapons(we just have to believe that they were there) and some explosives/grenade dummies? Or the
truck? As they tell us, nothing else was there.
If he really wrote and sended this sms, maybe he did it knowing he would die in seconds via police. And maybe he didn´t like those people and wanted
to cause trouble for them even after his death? Knowing that everybody will think that they are terrorists, because of this sms?
Even that would make more sense than just to write a sms with: Bring more weapons, it´s good, i have the equipment... That sms doesn´t fit to what
happened then! And which terrorists creates such a trace? Or are terrorists the only people on earth that don´t know that one mustn´t use the
internet and cellphones to plan and start an attack?
The news here said that some of the arrested people, one was his wife, are released again.
The "funniest" thing is that a french minister yesterday came up with the theory that Bouhlel radicalized at high speed.
Because every statement made about him doesn´t fit the muslim terrorist agenda.
So then he radicalized an hour before he started the truck? Come on Mr french Minister, that´s ridiculous, laughable. How did he do this? Via an
internet "IS" university??? Did he maybe get a certificate as evidence that he successfully radicalized? Did he bond a false beard to his face, or did
he grew his in an hour too? There were unconfirmed rumors that he growed a beard the last days... I believe this immediately...
Look, Bouhlel had mental problems, was very aggressive, had more problems than he could stand. Aren´t this exactly the people that are used by
whoever as patsies? Allegedly he had around 80.000Euros, but was unemployed. So, this money could come from the "IS", but really? I can´t believe
this. But everybody could have lured him with a lot of money, and trick him into that event.
First i thought he just freaked out and the officials were trying to create a link to the "IS". Because "IS" sounds better than confused perpetrator,
to extend the state of emergency, that otherwise had been ended at the end of this month. Now it´s again another three months more.
But if they come up now, today is the 17th, the event happened at the 14th, with some obscure "evidence" like hyperspeed radicalizing, "unforgeable"
sms, some rumors about growing beards and a lot of other contradictory statements, then i don´t know what to believe anymore. Even if one wants,
it´s really hard to believe the official story that they try to spin.
The "IS" didn´t even declare responsibility for the attack, but only that Bouhlel allegedly was a soldier of the "IS". Even security authorities here
say that is nothing else than an act of freeloading. The "IS" propaganda agency doesn´t need two days normally, but minutes to celebrate a successful
attack they started. And then they declare responsibility for the attack and don´t just assert that someone was an "IS" soldier, allegedly.
The "evidence" that is presented right now is evidence that they had to find on the first day. Like the sms on his phone, like the alleged videos of
him, allegedly "exercising" his attack days before it happened. Didn´t see them yet, but i wonder if one can recognize Bouhlel(and his beard xD)
clearly. Why did all that need so long, that are things you search for and find out in hours, if you are alone. And the security authorities aren´t
It seems more that it has to be an "IS" attack, at all costs. Most possible thing is that he freaked out. Next possible thing is that he was fooled
into that event. The at the time most unbelievable story is the official "IS" terrorist story, imho.