It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: Forensick
I'm not expert either. Yet the F-22 is already around a Mach 3 airframe-even though it can't maintain that speed-so why try to turn an SUV into a corvette...as Zaph said. There are downsides to a new 22 run, but certainly less barriers than an outright sixth gen of two variations.
The new run, if restricted to 'avionics' wouldn't be that expensive and seems to be the plan.
Bottom line is we don't have enough of them and we need more....
originally posted by: C0bzz
The F-22 is certainly NOT a mach 3 aircraft. It is an aircraft which has a cult following however.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: nwtrucker
Oh yes, we all have vested interests in these companies, because we don't agree with you. I have exactly zero ties to any aviation related company, and yet, I'm dead set against this idea, because it's going to screw everything else that is badly needed for years to come.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: nwtrucker
The F-22 can get nowhere near Mach 3. It's a Mach 2 aircraft, and unless you're willing to go straight down from 60,000 feet, you're not getting a Mach 2 aircraft to Mach 3.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: nwtrucker
If you have a manufacturing business, and part of it is shut down, regardless of why, and there's no sign that it's going to start up again, do you keep the buildings and tooling sitting there doing nothing? Do you keep the buildings and keep paying taxes, utilities, etc on them in the hopes that some day they'll be needed again? It was made clear that there was little chance of the line starting up again when it was cancelled.