It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How true!!! Star for you. Though I don't care for once were it's coming from. As long as she gets what she deserves I'm Golden😂
originally posted by: reldra
What a shock. Really though, the obvious reason to do this is is political. They do not care about perjury. They all lie daily.
originally posted by: Staroth
a reply to: xuenchen
Hillary is a master at the back peddle! I'm sure her and her camp have long cooked up her next statement (lie) to cover the other lie for the previous lie. heh
originally posted by: six67seven
It looks like HuffPost hasnt been informed of this news.
Its nowhere to be found on their 'Politics' page!
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: stinkelbaum
As Krakatoa clarified, it is about Perjury.
noun: perjury; plural noun: perjuries
The offense of willfully telling an untruth in a court
after having taken an oath or affirmation.
synonyms: lying under oath, giving false evidence/testimony,
making false statements, willful falsehood
"she was found guilty of perjury"
originally posted by: Indigo5
Just a note...not sure anybody on this thread understands the legal definition of perjury...
(1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or (2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true; is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen
I just read some other news releases on this impending investigation. Since the House has asked the Justice Department to open an investigation, can't the Justice Department just say "No!"?
Isn't Attorney General Loretta Lynch the one to say "Yes" or "No"? This is the lady whom Bill Clinton worked his magic on, during a 30 minute rendezvous on the tarmac. Oh well... this thread was exciting for a time. Thanx to the OP.