It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
Wtf goes on up in there!
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: six67seven
It looks like HuffPost hasnt been informed of this news.
Its nowhere to be found on their 'Politics' page!
Lmao
The staff is waiting for instructions from the DNC.
They don't want to be accused of being negligently careless.
But only one is running for President !!
originally posted by: Arizonaguy
a reply to: Indigo5
Except that we haven't seen the evidence. We only know that Congress alleges she intentionally misled Congress. Without that evidence, it's just speculation
So, I'd put more stock in the value of "oaths before Congress" if one of these knobs would take the oath and testify that the main object of their snipe hunt is not to destroy Hillary Clinton. Then they can turn over their private email servers for intense scrutiny by the FBI for ANYTHING THAT MIGHT BE AMISS.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Gryphon66
So, I'd put more stock in the value of "oaths before Congress" if one of these knobs would take the oath and testify that the main object of their snipe hunt is not to destroy Hillary Clinton. Then they can turn over their private email servers for intense scrutiny by the FBI for ANYTHING THAT MIGHT BE AMISS.
Unfortunately, when the Dems regain control of Congress next year, they will start their own witch hunts along these lines.
originally posted by: cklein61
Ok, we can go after Hillary for perjury. People think she lied about her emails. The money and time spent investigating her would not have happened if she was not running for president! Last week the British government came out and said there were no weapons of mass destruction. You know where I am going with this, and you still want to put her in jail for emails.. Give me a break! Compare emails to murder!!!