It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

LIVE: FBI Director testifies before House Oversight Committee at 10am est. Live feed

page: 11
70
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: introvert
Intent is the standard used when deciding to escalate a case.

Is that what he just said?


Did she intentionally use an unsecured server?



Sounds like Comey just said he could not prove that beyond a reasonable doubt.


Yet he also said that there would be repercussions from disciplinary actions to terminations and denial of security clearence if anyone else had commited the negligence that Clinton has shown. So where is the punishment for clinton?


Yes, such things are usually handled internally. Clinton is no longer a government employee, so they can't reprimand her.

But there is not enough to make a criminal case out of it.


She is still receiving security briefings daily as a POTUS candidate.




posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:12 AM
link   
Well he said she was negligent. Can they get him to say she is gross?



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:13 AM
link   
a reply to: EternalSolace

Someone from the Obama Admin, can't remember who, already stated she would be briefed, regardless, once she is the official nominee.



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: introvert
Intent is the standard used when deciding to escalate a case.

Is that what he just said?


Did she intentionally use an unsecured server?



Sounds like Comey just said he could not prove that beyond a reasonable doubt.


Yet he also said that there would be repercussions from disciplinary actions to terminations and denial of security clearence if anyone else had commited the negligence that Clinton has shown. So where is the punishment for clinton?


Yes, such things are usually handled internally. Clinton is no longer a government employee, so they can't reprimand her.

But there is not enough to make a criminal case out of it.


But enough evidence and negligence proven for a complete denial of security clearance. Why hasn't this happened yet?


Not sure. Doesn't matter.

The President of the US does not have a security clearance. If she wins the election, if wont matter one bit.



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: introvert
Intent is the standard used when deciding to escalate a case.

Is that what he just said?


Did she intentionally use an unsecured server?



Sounds like Comey just said he could not prove that beyond a reasonable doubt.


Yet he also said that there would be repercussions from disciplinary actions to terminations and denial of security clearence if anyone else had commited the negligence that Clinton has shown. So where is the punishment for clinton?


Yes, such things are usually handled internally. Clinton is no longer a government employee, so they can't reprimand her.

But there is not enough to make a criminal case out of it.


She is still receiving security briefings daily as a POTUS candidate.


So? Do you think they are telling her super-secret information?



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:15 AM
link   
It seems as though some of these speakers are only smoozing for their constituents to appear as looking out for their party interests.



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: introvert
Intent is the standard used when deciding to escalate a case.

Is that what he just said?


Did she intentionally use an unsecured server?



Sounds like Comey just said he could not prove that beyond a reasonable doubt.


So she accidently set up a server in her basement?

Yeah, I've done that too.

Accidents happen.




posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:16 AM
link   
Mr. Lieu just knocked it out of the park.



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:17 AM
link   
So they are telling us that as long as we only kill ONE person and we didn't MEAN to kill them; then it's OK?



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
So Comey would have us believe that FBI INVESTIGATIONS are 'democratic' !!!

Who is stupid enough to believe that ?



Unfortunately, half of the population who is about to vote for her.


iTruthSeeker



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:18 AM
link   
Lol, this guy makes sense, 100th of 1 percent...but what about all the deleted emails, can we speculate that the percentage was higher?



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: EternalSolace
Comey is off his damn rocker. I don't know how many more excuses he can make for Clinton than he has already. This is pathetic. Confidence in Comey is now lost and he should resign or be fired by whomever has the power to do so. It's completely obvious he's towing Clinton's line.

This whole thing is sickening.


The "problem" is coming from the Obama Administration and the Attorney General.

The FBI can't force an indictment or file criminal charges.

And look at the strategy......

If the FBI did recommend indictment, Comey would not be able to discuss anything.

No recommendation = full exposure of Hillary Clinton.




posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:18 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert

He's playing baseball while everyone else is fact digging?



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
Mr. Lieu just knocked it out of the park.


Really? I think he struck out playing t-ball...



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: introvert
Intent is the standard used when deciding to escalate a case.

Is that what he just said?


Did she intentionally use an unsecured server?



Sounds like Comey just said he could not prove that beyond a reasonable doubt.


Yet he also said that there would be repercussions from disciplinary actions to terminations and denial of security clearence if anyone else had commited the negligence that Clinton has shown. So where is the punishment for clinton?


Yes, such things are usually handled internally. Clinton is no longer a government employee, so they can't reprimand her.

But there is not enough to make a criminal case out of it.


She is still receiving security briefings daily as a POTUS candidate.


So? Do you think they are telling her super-secret information?



Yes. She is provided with classified info during those briefings.



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:20 AM
link   
wow, she was NOT under oath and it was not recorded.

WT absolute F?



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:21 AM
link   
Okay, so what's happening now? I had to stop watching!



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:21 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Full disclosure? He's made excuse after excuse for Clinton. This is more than about full disclosure. I don't buy that for a bit. He's towing the Clinton line.



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:21 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

(C) = confidential material in this paragraph.



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 11:22 AM
link   
WOW!

Comey didn't interview hillary and didn't talk to all the agents that did!

So they just told him everything was cool?!

She wasn't under oath? Did I hear that?

Mr. Mica asked some good questions!




new topics

top topics



 
70
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join