It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gazrok
I fail to see where you gave one logic in the conclusion that the lack of motive rules out any murder. Maybe you can enlighten me.
Well..........
1. I don't think it was murder, so there needn't be a motive....
2. A car crash is a pretty unsure method of assassination. It's more likely that the target would survive the crash.
3. Most murders aren't attempted in full view of the papparazzi!
4. Surely, there were more attractive moments if the goal was to kill Diana.
5. There are dozens of unsuspicious ways to commit this hit, than hoping she'd die in the ensuing crash. (plane crash, much surer chance there, and she's flying all the time).
All in all, it just doesn't seem logical that Lady Di's death in these circumstances, was a planned hit...
Originally posted by Gazrok
I fail to see where you gave one logic in the conclusion that the lack of motive rules out any murder. Maybe you can enlighten me.
Well..........
1. I don't think it was murder, so there needn't be a motive....
2. A car crash is a pretty unsure method of assassination. It's more likely that the target would survive the crash.
3. Most murders aren't attempted in full view of the papparazzi!
4. Surely, there were more attractive moments if the goal was to kill Diana.
5. There are dozens of unsuspicious ways to commit this hit, than hoping she'd die in the ensuing crash. (plane crash, much surer chance there, and she's flying all the time).
All in all, it just doesn't seem logical that Lady Di's death in these circumstances, was a planned hit...
Originally posted by Abraham Virtue
Originally posted by Gazrok
I fail to see where you gave one logic in the conclusion that the lack of motive rules out any murder. Maybe you can enlighten me.
Well..........
1. I don't think it was murder, so there needn't be a motive....
2. A car crash is a pretty unsure method of assassination. It's more likely that the target would survive the crash.
3. Most murders aren't attempted in full view of the papparazzi!
4. Surely, there were more attractive moments if the goal was to kill Diana.
5. There are dozens of unsuspicious ways to commit this hit, than hoping she'd die in the ensuing crash. (plane crash, much surer chance there, and she's flying all the time).
All in all, it just doesn't seem logical that Lady Di's death in these circumstances, was a planned hit...
Answers:
1--You must not understand. You said that there is no motive and therefore their was no reason for her to be murdered. All I was asking for was your reasoning on that as a REASON for ruling out the possibility of a murder. You See?
2--Oh really? Well it sure is a clean way. The best way to kill someone is to make it look like it was an accident. That is the new fad in high scale hits. Only TRUE professional killers can pull that off. Besides it has been done countless times. Saddam used to do it all the time and he was very successful at it. Just see for yourself. Go ahead. Look it up, it is out there. Can you find it? Or should I say, "Are you willing to find it?"
3--That is where you seem to lose the truth of the facts. The facts are that no one saw the car crash. Including the papparazzi. Show me where it says anyone did witness this crash. Can you???
4--Attractive moments??? Where do you come up with this stuff??? As if there is some sort of prefered time frame for killing. The truth is that it was all symbolic. I will have to get back to you on the so-called reasons for killing her at this time as opposed to that time.(Seriously, that is a weak and invalid point. That doesn't disprove anything, and you know it.)
5--Once again, this just shows how little you really know about the ritualistic murder of Satanism. Read up on the Pont de L'Alma tunnel. Then maybe you will See.(David Icke wrote pages of info that could tear this statement in shreads. Once again, read his book. Quit wasting your time fooling yourself and trying to prove me wrong with you bias view.)
Any more????????????
Originally posted by cassini
"You say that he was forced to confess. Well once again, isn't that more proof???"
1) He was forced to APOLOGIZE, which is the normal procedure when an allegation has been made that is false. Newspapers are made to do it in similar cases.
2) He was made to do this by a court of law and due trial.
Av, these guys are n`t my masters and as I said earlier,
"give me JFK or Reagan and I`ll talk conspiracy but DIANA???" come on.
I`d just like to state something here. Every single person on this thread is relying on speculation of the facts. None of us have access to first hand information on this, so everything said here is nonsense effectively.
However, lets look at the two sources of information. On the one hand we have the worlds paperazzi witnessing a road accident, we have a toxicology report, and numerous eye witnesses stating the driver was drunk, which would seem to be coroborated by the fact he was a known achololic. Stacked up against this is the man who claimed to be the son of god, claims queen Elizabeth and George Bush are reptoids and seriously beliefs it.
If one were looking at this properly with an eye to the quality of evidence, you would appreciate that there can be only one conclusion.
"Many lobbies had some interest on her death. The Royal Familly and also the Land Mines Cies are just 2 very good exemples."
Once again, there are have been and will be many people and organisations trying to get rid of land mines, Diana was no different to any of them. Richard Branson has for many years beeen trying to help with the removal of land mines. Another high profile Brit who is strangely alive, ah but of course he is n`t pregnant with dodis baby.
Originally posted by Peace
An interesting article, although i am extremely sceptical, i don't believe Princess Diana's death was an accident or the fault of the media. This article must be quite old and it makes crazy allegations (eg. Diana was supposed to marry Bill Clinton)
Anywayz, here's the link
www.warbaby.com...
Originally posted by cassini
"Some people don't have the mind or the heart to handle such controversal subjects. I wouldn't be suprised if you and Cassini fit that category"
I certainly do and Gaz has shown he can time and again. You however, have showed yourself to be quite paranoid about everything. Challenge everything but don`t expect everything to topple and most important don`t make facts up. You sadly see a conspiracy in everything, and I`m quite happy to admit that they exist and operate but not under every stone and rock. When talking about something like this the purpose is ultimately useless as the evidence is out of our domain.
You should be using your energy where its really needed.
Originally posted by drunk
Originally posted by Peace
An interesting article, although i am extremely sceptical, i don't believe Princess Diana's death was an accident or the fault of the media. This article must be quite old and it makes crazy allegations (eg. Diana was supposed to marry Bill Clinton)
Anywayz, here's the link
www.warbaby.com...
AV read the first paragraph of the link"the victim has to be willing to be sacrificed"
And how do you know Di was willing?
Originally posted by cassini
"Some defense you have there"
I`m not defending. Just stating an opinion.
"So I guess Diana isn't worthy or likely to have a conspiracy around her name, but JFK and Reagan are. Come on. She was more powerful then those two combined. More influential too."
You need go no further. ROFLMAO.
"Well it seems as if you are trying to make this personal"
Where? I`ve never made this personal. Please clarify.
[Edited on 26-6-2003 by cassini]
Originally posted by drunk
No matter how hard AV tries to convince me with his Satanism angle i still believe she was not murdered.
Originally posted by cassini
Abraham with one simple sentence you have demonstrated quite ably how little of this you really understand, any further discussion seems useless.
""So I guess Diana isn't worthy or likely to have a conspiracy around her name, but JFK and Reagan are. Come on. She was more powerful then those two combined. More influential too."