It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Cool video, but Trump's problem is illegal immigrants. It's like if a candidate lamented drug dealers, and as a social experiment, someone made a video called "Meet a pharmacist". It's false to equate legal and illegal immigrants.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
So a law abiding Muslim living in London should be banned from entering just because he is Muslim?
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: mOjOm
The law states there cannot even be an appearance of conflict of interest. It appears there is. The judge's affiliations are questionable. The fact his parents were illegals (debatable) is questionable.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: mOjOm
The law states there cannot even be an appearance of conflict of interest.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
The judge's affiliations are questionable.
Some Trump supporters have incorrectly linked La Raza Lawyers to the National Council of La Raza, a 50-year-old civil rights group that has been strongly critical of Trump's proposals on immigration, as well as his idea to temporarily ban Muslims from entering the United States.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
The fact his parents were illegals (debatable) is questionable.
Raul Curiel said their father, Salvador, arrived in Arizona as a laborer in the 1920s, eventually receiving citizenship and becoming a steelworker. Their parents were married in Mexico in 1946, and their mother, Francisca, became a citizen after joining her husband in the United States.
originally posted by: mOjOm
Is anyone questioning Trumps Loyalty to the country??
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
I find this very interesting looking at a few comments already made on this thread and in other comments i see.
The issue is not so much immigration but rather the language that is used.
Is immigration a issue that needs to be addressed, yes!
Its a perfectly valid political debate that has to be had and there is absolutely nothing wrong with discussing reducing immigration.
What is a big issue however is how this debate is being had, Trump has made several very inflammatory comments towards immigrants that rather than engaging debate has turned it into a slagging match. Thats the big problem, its not that he is against immigration it is how he argues his point.
Its interesting how "anti-trump" seems to be synonymous with "pro-immigration"
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: mOjOm
La Raza is a known hate group associated with the Reconquista movement why can't you comprehend that?
originally posted by: Raggedyman
The USA should just open their borders for everyone, just let everyone in
That would be so nice of you guys
And of course there would be no more problems with illegals everyone is a legal
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Then, let the law decide if there is "a strong possibility that the judge's decision will be biased." I don't think one's ethnicity automatically creates an impropriety. But apparently Trump does.
And why doesn't Trump simply request a recusal instead of showing his ass? He's just all talk (name-calling) and NO action. He knows there's no basis for recusal, he just didn't like the judgment and went after the man's ethnicity. I have no use for such childish behavior from an adult.
I can't believe how absurd your arguments are. Anchor baby? Really? You're an intelligent person, but you're parroting the shtick as if you believe everything you're told by Trump.
I know Mexican isn't a race. I didn't say or imply that it was.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: mOjOm
Yeah, it'd be like another group calling themselves the KKK. it doesn't mean that they are racist also!