It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
How do you know we're Scientologists? Special Sauce has stated explicitly that he isn't. Can you even define the word "Scientologist?" If I were Trump id call you "TrecherousTerryDon. Ha! That's a good one.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
Typical troll. You read titles of lengthy articles and then assume that it has material that will back up your claims, so you don't read it. You're too lazy to read it. So you post links to it and then have genuinely curious people wasting their time reading it. When they report back that it doesn't pertain to your claim, you tell them to look harder. You weasel you.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
Don't fall for Terry's trick, SpecialSauce. He's one of those people. He'll have you reading things he hasn't read, for hours.
originally posted by: SpecialSauce
a reply to: TerryDon79
Can't find one murder, manslaughter etcetera conviction of a Scientology member or church official. You claimed you did but you didn't. You're just outright lying IMO.
Typical scientologist. Someone provides evidence against your cult and you close your eyes.
Apart from the fact that the link I provided shows the convictions and have links to said conviction.
Also, the only 2 people who are saying that they're wrong are the 2 scientologists.
It's obvious that you're both scientologists. Why else would you stick up for them and deny evidence presented? You also use all the typical Scientology arguments.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and sounds like a duck......it must be a scientologist.
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: SpecialSauce
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: SpecialSauce
you are aware Hubbard fought in ww2 right?
Where exactly did he fight?
I know of the disciplinary action he faced for opening fire on a non existent sub off the coast of Mexico, but other than that his records don't even show he was in any combat theater.
The four medals that the US Navy's record credits to Hubbard were the American Defense Service Medal, which was awarded to all members of the military in service at the time of the December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor; the American Campaign Medal, awarded to all service members who had performed duty in the American Theater of Operations during the war; the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, awarded to all who had served in the Pacific Theater; and the World War II Victory Medal, awarded to all who served during World War II.[8
From Wikipedia
You do know that that doesn't mean he fought, just that he was there?
You know. Smoking his pipe merrily while they boys played with bullets. Typical WW2 scenario.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: SpecialSauce
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: SpecialSauce
you are aware Hubbard fought in ww2 right?
Where exactly did he fight?
I know of the disciplinary action he faced for opening fire on a non existent sub off the coast of Mexico, but other than that his records don't even show he was in any combat theater.
The four medals that the US Navy's record credits to Hubbard were the American Defense Service Medal, which was awarded to all members of the military in service at the time of the December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor; the American Campaign Medal, awarded to all service members who had performed duty in the American Theater of Operations during the war; the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, awarded to all who had served in the Pacific Theater; and the World War II Victory Medal, awarded to all who served during World War II.[8
From Wikipedia
You do know that that doesn't mean he fought, just that he was there?
You know. Smoking his pipe merrily while they boys played with bullets. Typical WW2 scenario.
Those medals were given for attendance, not fighting. That means that those medals can't prove he done anything more than sleep in his bunk the whole time.
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: SpecialSauce
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: SpecialSauce
you are aware Hubbard fought in ww2 right?
Where exactly did he fight?
I know of the disciplinary action he faced for opening fire on a non existent sub off the coast of Mexico, but other than that his records don't even show he was in any combat theater.
The four medals that the US Navy's record credits to Hubbard were the American Defense Service Medal, which was awarded to all members of the military in service at the time of the December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor; the American Campaign Medal, awarded to all service members who had performed duty in the American Theater of Operations during the war; the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, awarded to all who had served in the Pacific Theater; and the World War II Victory Medal, awarded to all who served during World War II.[8
From Wikipedia
You do know that that doesn't mean he fought, just that he was there?
You know. Smoking his pipe merrily while they boys played with bullets. Typical WW2 scenario.
Those medals were given for attendance, not fighting. That means that those medals can't prove he done anything more than sleep in his bunk the whole time.
Right. I get you, bro. That's how WW2 went down. Some soldiers fought in the battle, some slept it out. Especially naval battles where you're confined to a boat. Tag team effort, like WWE.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Aristotelian1
You're not just defending them, you're using all the Scientology tactics. We've all seen it here plenty of times.
The sites motto is "Deny Ignorance", but scientologists are the most ignorant people I know.
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: SpecialSauce
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: SpecialSauce
you are aware Hubbard fought in ww2 right?
Where exactly did he fight?
I know of the disciplinary action he faced for opening fire on a non existent sub off the coast of Mexico, but other than that his records don't even show he was in any combat theater.
The four medals that the US Navy's record credits to Hubbard were the American Defense Service Medal, which was awarded to all members of the military in service at the time of the December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor; the American Campaign Medal, awarded to all service members who had performed duty in the American Theater of Operations during the war; the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, awarded to all who had served in the Pacific Theater; and the World War II Victory Medal, awarded to all who served during World War II.[8
From Wikipedia
You do know that that doesn't mean he fought, just that he was there?
You know. Smoking his pipe merrily while they boys played with bullets. Typical WW2 scenario.
Those medals were given for attendance, not fighting. That means that those medals can't prove he done anything more than sleep in his bunk the whole time.
Right. I get you, bro. That's how WW2 went down. Some soldiers fought in the battle, some slept it out. Especially naval battles where you're confined to a boat. Tag team effort, like WWE.
originally posted by: SpecialSauce
a reply to: TerryDon79
Right, they were just proving he was where combat was, they don't disprove that he was invisible to enemy boats .
I'm done messing with you man, I'm just joking around. I think that you need to work on better verifiying what's false and what's true. I also think you need to stop with the silly "order 88" trick. The most precious thing people have is their integrity and their time, you shouldn't inhibit your integrity by wasting their time.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: SpecialSauce
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: SpecialSauce
you are aware Hubbard fought in ww2 right?
Where exactly did he fight?
I know of the disciplinary action he faced for opening fire on a non existent sub off the coast of Mexico, but other than that his records don't even show he was in any combat theater.
The four medals that the US Navy's record credits to Hubbard were the American Defense Service Medal, which was awarded to all members of the military in service at the time of the December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor; the American Campaign Medal, awarded to all service members who had performed duty in the American Theater of Operations during the war; the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, awarded to all who had served in the Pacific Theater; and the World War II Victory Medal, awarded to all who served during World War II.[8
From Wikipedia
You do know that that doesn't mean he fought, just that he was there?
You know. Smoking his pipe merrily while they boys played with bullets. Typical WW2 scenario.
Those medals were given for attendance, not fighting. That means that those medals can't prove he done anything more than sleep in his bunk the whole time.
Right. I get you, bro. That's how WW2 went down. Some soldiers fought in the battle, some slept it out. Especially naval battles where you're confined to a boat. Tag team effort, like WWE.
That post offers nothing.
Like I have said, the medals only prove he was there, not that he fought.
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
I'm done messing with you man, I'm just joking around. I think that you need to work on better verifiying what's false and what's true. I also think you need to stop with the silly "order 88" trick. The most precious think people have is their integrity and their time, you shouldn't inhibit your integrity by wasting their time.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: SpecialSauce
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: SpecialSauce
you are aware Hubbard fought in ww2 right?
Where exactly did he fight?
I know of the disciplinary action he faced for opening fire on a non existent sub off the coast of Mexico, but other than that his records don't even show he was in any combat theater.
The four medals that the US Navy's record credits to Hubbard were the American Defense Service Medal, which was awarded to all members of the military in service at the time of the December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor; the American Campaign Medal, awarded to all service members who had performed duty in the American Theater of Operations during the war; the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, awarded to all who had served in the Pacific Theater; and the World War II Victory Medal, awarded to all who served during World War II.[8
From Wikipedia
You do know that that doesn't mean he fought, just that he was there?
You know. Smoking his pipe merrily while they boys played with bullets. Typical WW2 scenario.
Those medals were given for attendance, not fighting. That means that those medals can't prove he done anything more than sleep in his bunk the whole time.
Right. I get you, bro. That's how WW2 went down. Some soldiers fought in the battle, some slept it out. Especially naval battles where you're confined to a boat. Tag team effort, like WWE.
That post offers nothing.
Like I have said, the medals only prove he was there, not that he fought.
originally posted by: SpecialSauce
a reply to: TerryDon79
You claimed a Scientologist killed someone and got convicted of it. I did some searching, I don't know how they're so Teflon clean but I found where a guy whose mother was a Scientologist killed someone. Is that what you're referring to?
originally posted by: SpecialSauce
a reply to: TerryDon79
You claimed a Scientologist killed someone and got convicted of it. I did some searching, I don't know how they're so Teflon clean but I found where a guy whose mother was a Scientologist killed someone. Is that what you're referring to?
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
originally posted by: SpecialSauce
a reply to: TerryDon79
You claimed a Scientologist killed someone and got convicted of it. I did some searching, I don't know how they're so Teflon clean but I found where a guy whose mother was a Scientologist killed someone. Is that what you're referring to?
He was just putting a variation of "order 88" on you. That's all.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: SpecialSauce
a reply to: TerryDon79
You claimed a Scientologist killed someone and got convicted of it. I did some searching, I don't know how they're so Teflon clean but I found where a guy whose mother was a Scientologist killed someone. Is that what you're referring to?
I actually claimed more than just murder. Funny how you're so stuck on that one.
I know of that case, but there are others. I wouldn't really count that one as he wasn't in Scientology, but his mother was.
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: SpecialSauce
a reply to: TerryDon79
You claimed a Scientologist killed someone and got convicted of it. I did some searching, I don't know how they're so Teflon clean but I found where a guy whose mother was a Scientologist killed someone. Is that what you're referring to?
I actually claimed more than just murder. Funny how you're so stuck on that one.
I know of that case, but there are others. I wouldn't really count that one as he wasn't in Scientology, but his mother was.
HAHA! Go ahead Terry. Back up your claim.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: SpecialSauce
a reply to: TerryDon79
You claimed a Scientologist killed someone and got convicted of it. I did some searching, I don't know how they're so Teflon clean but I found where a guy whose mother was a Scientologist killed someone. Is that what you're referring to?
I actually claimed more than just murder. Funny how you're so stuck on that one.
I know of that case, but there are others. I wouldn't really count that one as he wasn't in Scientology, but his mother was.