It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

AP FACT CHECK: SOME CLINTON EMAIL MISSTATEMENTS

page: 1
6

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 31 2016 @ 06:48 AM
link   


ST. LOUIS (AP) -- Over the months, Hillary Clinton misstated key facts about her use of private email and her own server for her work as secretary of state, the department's inspector general reported this week.

hosted.ap.org...

Well the Associated Press is joining in the reporting, and checking the record.



A look at some of Clinton's past claims about her unusual email set-up and how they compare with the inspector general's findings:


The AP is not the vast right wing conspiracy against the Clintons. I do not think she is going to be able to get away with this scandal. How long with the DNC allow her to get dragged through the mud before they force her to drop out?

When the AP is listing problem by problem and statement by statement which show lie after lie she is in troulble.




posted on May, 31 2016 @ 06:57 AM
link   


How long with the DNC allow her to get dragged through the mud before they force her to drop out?


They won't . Clinton is the money train for the Dems and they are not going to give that up easily. Hilary will keep lying and denying, all the way to prison.



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 07:00 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

I'm not sure why the AP is calling them "misstatements" and not calling them what they are.

Flat out lies.

Like dodging sniper fire in Bosnia.



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 07:25 AM
link   
If you obfuscate, change small bits of "facts", drag out investigations for years, and smother the masses with half-truths, lies, and fables, eventually, even the most important news event of our generation becomes old hat.

The Clintons are masters of "drag it out 'till it dies".

People have been saying "are we still talking about this" for months now and the grand jury hasn't even been convened.

Clinton has won and the battle hasn't even started.

RICO charges against a former Secretary of State and current Presidential candidate should be nuclear, instead is a punchline. Why? The media got ahead of the curve and inundated the masses with trivial articles by the dozens to make the average Joe/Jane build up a mental block against further information.



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 07:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: 200Plus
If you obfuscate, change small bits of "facts", drag out investigations for years, and smother the masses with half-truths, lies, and fables, eventually, even the most important news event of our generation becomes old hat.

The Clintons are masters of "drag it out 'till it dies".

People have been saying "are we still talking about this" for months now and the grand jury hasn't even been convened.

Clinton has won and the battle hasn't even started.

RICO charges against a former Secretary of State and current Presidential candidate should be nuclear, instead is a punchline. Why? The media got ahead of the curve and inundated the masses with trivial articles by the dozens to make the average Joe/Jane build up a mental block against further information.



I wish people would read this. Its not like I think you are smoking some pot at the moment, but putting it out with smoke that smells and yet no one can smell it.



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 08:15 AM
link   
This isn't Glen Beck or Alex Jones this is the Associated Press. When the AP has enough info to list several lies told during the investigation how will the FBI not indict?



CLINTON: "In the fall, I think it was October of last year (2014), the State Department sent a letter to previous secretaries of state asking for help with their record-keeping, in part because of the technical problems that they knew they had to deal with. And they asked that we, all of us, go through our e-mails to determine what was work-related and to provide that for them." - NBC News, September. THE REPORT: While it's true that the State Department requested records from former secretaries of state in November 2014, the report says the department raised concerns about Clinton's compliance with federal record-keeping laws years earlier, and the attention did not appear welcome. Two employees in the Office of Information Resources Management discussed concerns about her use of a personal email account in separate 2010 meetings. One of the employees stressed in one of the meetings that the information being transmitted needed to be preserved to satisfy federal records laws. They were instructed by the director of the department "never to speak of the Secretary's personal email system again," according to the report.

This shows motive and intent; all the FBI has to do is ask those concerned who shut down the discussion, and follow that trail to Hillary. I don't think these people love Hillary enough to do jail time for her.



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 08:52 AM
link   
a reply to: 200Plus


RICO charges against a former Secretary of State and current Presidential candidate should be nuclear, instead is a punchline. Why? The media got ahead of the curve and inundated the masses with trivial articles by the dozens to make the average Joe/Jane build up a mental block against further information.

They play out anything they want to bury, shows how the media is complicit with the gubment, et al. Bushes sealed white house testimony before the 911 commission was a little too obvious, so now they goto the hidden email server…

does it exist, were is it, whats it say???



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 11:15 AM
link   
a reply to: DAVID64



Clinton is the money train for the Dems

That she is.
Do you know why?

Because the big money knows that she is dirty and can be bought.



new topics

top topics



 
6

log in

join