It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

miscreants in bathrooms - its NOT new

page: 1
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 26 2016 @ 05:32 AM
link   
it is my opinion that the " bathroom issue " has truely ` jumped teh shark `

ATS contributers are now dragging up tails from 3 years ago as ` evidence `

which is really just shooting thier entire case in the foot

there have ALWAYS been miscreants in bathrooms - of one stripe or another .

SO - please stop pretending that any clarification of transgendered rights is going to lead to anything more serious than transgendered people going to the toilet

as this current farce - however it ends is not actually going to increase or deacrese any REAL risk of any actual harm befalling people in toilets

i can dredge up annecdotes too - mine going back to the early 80s


mine involves male drug dealers frequenting the male toilets of the city centre of a large town in the UK , but the problem did concern parents - who would be loathe to allow thier male children to use certain toilets unaccompanied .

i has no reccolection of any similar problems in female tolets in the same area // timeframe

no sexual assaults were reported - but violent altracations were common .

if you want to be oposed to transgendered rights - go ahead and froth , but dont claim that its going to bring doom to the tolets



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 05:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
it is my opinion that the " bathroom issue " has truely ` jumped teh shark `

ATS contributers are now dragging up tails from 3 years ago as ` evidence `

which is really just shooting thier entire case in the foot

there have ALWAYS been miscreants in bathrooms - of one stripe or another .

SO - please stop pretending that any clarification of transgendered rights is going to lead to anything more serious than transgendered people going to the toilet

as this current farce - however it ends is not actually going to increase or deacrese any REAL risk of any actual harm befalling people in toilets

i can dredge up annecdotes too - mine going back to the early 80s


mine involves male drug dealers frequenting the male toilets of the city centre of a large town in the UK , but the problem did concern parents - who would be loathe to allow thier male children to use certain toilets unaccompanied .

i has no reccolection of any similar problems in female tolets in the same area // timeframe

no sexual assaults were reported - but violent altracations were common .

if you want to be oposed to transgendered rights - go ahead and froth , but dont claim that its going to bring doom to the tolets


Absolutely nothing new....now? Merely empowered....



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 05:41 AM
link   
a reply to: nwtrucker

They were before...the only reason a big deal had to be made out of it because apparently some people just happened to notice 10 years later that people were doing it.

There is no actual proof or evidence to suggest that allowing Transgendered people to use whatever bathroom they want is going to lead to anything else but people relieving themselves comfortably.

~Tenth



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 06:05 AM
link   
a reply to: tothetenthpower

The problem being it cannot, by definition be restricted to transgenders.

Personally, I couldn't care less where one squats. Out houses being the precedent.....


The latest on the slippery slope is the case where 'ladies' must be removed as the name on a bathroom. Court ordered.



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 06:07 AM
link   
a reply to: nwtrucker

Oh I see what you mean on that front.

Yeah..I get that.

I still don't the see the overall issue as these fears are all worse case scenario, that last part you mentioned, crazy talk.

As in, I believe you, but that's crazy.

~Tenth



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 06:22 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

Great rant. It turns out that there's lots of evidence you're right. Transgendered people always chose which bathroom to use except where they couldn't because an authority figure knew their birth sex such as the workplace or school. A dozen or so states have included transgendered people in their anti-discrimination laws and specify that they can choose the bathroom they use... some states for several years now.




posted on May, 26 2016 @ 06:34 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

I can remember in the 80s/90s when public toilets had holes carved in the partitions by perverts. On the rare occasions of needing to use them, it'd be fairly common practice to block up any holes with tissue paper. We had a family holiday to Disney in Florida and it was the same there - early 90s.

Predators and voyeurs looking at kids and/or men.



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 06:39 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

Why is it so damn hard for foreigners to keep their noses out of issues that are not their problem?

The USA kicked the damn crown out hundreds of years ago!

While you are 'trying' to seem vague, we all known damn well who you are referring to.

A) What is or is not reported by the news(read propaganda) is strictly dictated both here and abroad by the GOV
B) Why should 0.3% of the population rule over the remaining 99.7%
C) If you have a d!ck, use the men's room, if you have vagina then use the women's room. Really not difficult...
D) How does your story of drug dealers even matter?
E) (from you own post) Why do you demean 'violent altercations' by comparing them to 'sexual assaults'? Is one victim more worthy than the other?
F) Guess who started this whole damn thing??? Yes, straight cis people. This has nothing to do with transgender rights at all, it is all about control. Divide and conquer, and you are playing along.

Personally, I would have to assume (seeing as trans are NOT a new fad) that they have been doing their business in whichever restroom they damn well pleased for at least as long as I have been alive. I have never really heard of any issues until now...Why now?

How about you take a really deep look at global markets, why they are acting as they are, and how this will affect the people of the US (and nosey people too) when everything comes to fruition. All the while we are arguing about genitalia!! This world has gone insane! 2016 is gonna be a hell of a year!




edit on 26-5-2016 by C8H10N4O2 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 07:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: ignorant_ape

I can remember in the 80s/90s when public toilets had holes carved in the partitions by perverts. On the rare occasions of needing to use them, it'd be fairly common practice to block up any holes with tissue paper. We had a family holiday to Disney in Florida and it was the same there - early 90s.

Predators and voyeurs looking at kids and/or men.



Uhm, you do know those little round holes that used to be very occasionally found in male bathrooms were not holes for predators and voyeurs to look at kids and/or men don't you?

Those are called 'gloryholes', and they were popular in the gay male community back in the day as a way of getting anonymous sex. They weren't for peeking through to be a voyeur, they were for putting your penis through so that your agreed anonymous partner in the next cubicle could provide oral sex.

They tended to only be found in public bathrooms where there was a recognised gay cruising scene going on, so I'm very very surprised you found one at Disney. You'd think anybody who cut a hole in a Disney cubicle would be escorted out and the cleaners would find it within 24 hours and have it repaired.



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 07:13 AM
link   
a reply to: Kandinsky




On the rare occasions of needing to use them, it'd be fairly common practice to block up any holes with tissue paper.


Why block them...carry a spray bottle of bleach..."if thine eye offend thee" etc.

They would lose stereoscopic vision, make it harder for them to see "3D live meat"



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 07:18 AM
link   
a reply to: C8H10N4O2




you take a really deep look at global markets, why they are acting as they are, and how this will affect the people of the US (and nosey people too) when everything comes to fruition. All the while we are arguing about genitalia!


Well being "foreigners" we have as much right to be "talking heads" on ATS as much as you have spreading your "democracy" and installing puppet regimes around the planet, as to the global markets...are they being played by JP Morgan again, or your Saudi brothers supporting the US petrodollar?



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 07:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: Painterz
They tended to only be found in public bathrooms where there was a recognised gay cruising scene going on, so I'm very very surprised you found one at Disney. You'd think anybody who cut a hole in a Disney cubicle would be escorted out and the cleaners would find it within 24 hours and have it repaired.


Surely the one found at Disney was a mouse hole?

A Mickey Mouse hole..



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 07:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Painterz



Those are called 'gloryholes', and they were popular in the gay male community back in the day as a way of getting anonymous sex. They weren't for peeking through to be a voyeur, they were for putting your penis through so that your agreed anonymous partner in the next cubicle could provide oral sex.


I was talking about spyholes, they weren't big enough to get a finger through never mind some reckless dude's happy penis!! Jeez, like anyone would dangle their bits through a blind hole on the off-chance it wasn't met with screams and a brutal punch lol.



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 07:48 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

You're clearly an idiot if you don't think a "free for all" policy will have zero impact. If you have a fraction of a functional brain you'd recognize this as well. So, the questions is, how many more people assaulted is worth .03% of the population being allowed to choose their own bathroom? How many more kids being choked in public restrooms is okay with you? 100? 1? If you can muster the mental capacity to understand that ever action has consequences, maybe you'd like to take a moment to share your plan for preventing it? Please don't say "laws already exist to prevent such behavior." That's the argument of ineffectual morons. If it were a valid argument, there would be no need for police! Or do you always just stick your head in the sand and pretend nothing is happening?



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 08:00 AM
link   
a reply to: neveroddoreven99

You mean like the impact banning guns would have had on situations like Sandy Hook where 20 6-7 year old innocent children got shot and killed? How many little kids have to get shot before we realize we should pass more laws against guns?



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 08:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

"I make a choice to do something and if you don't like it then you're discriminating against me." The tans movement motto.



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 08:42 AM
link   
miscreants in bathrooms - its NOT new

But freedom hating Marxist Liberals openly pushing for rights to access victims for violent illegal perversions in bathrooms are.

Recognize the wrong, don't fall for their false defense when they say you hate transgenders. It is the immoral pedophiles and rapists that society rightly hates and has every right to express it. Left wing extremists want to break the barrier down to open the floodgates to unbridled immorality.



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 08:46 AM
link   
a reply to: TinfoilTP




posted on May, 26 2016 @ 08:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: neveroddoreven99

You mean like the impact banning guns would have had on situations like Sandy Hook where 20 6-7 year old innocent children got shot and killed? How many little kids have to get shot before we realize we should pass more laws against guns?



Why do you discriminate against free people by wanting to take their guns?

You are practicing a hate crime.



posted on May, 26 2016 @ 08:58 AM
link   
a reply to: TinfoilTP

I repeat my question: how many little kids have to be shot in the face?



new topics

top topics



 
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join