looking at the first graph, you're on to something. it's difficult to say if it's 100% correct after a moment, but it feels right. i was thinking
about it around a decade ago. i'm not sure about the angles/curvature, but that's probably just because you've cramped 3 dimensions on 2-dimensional
picture, with one of them actually progressing differently depending on the point of view.
the second picture however, well. if you can't be bothered to redraw it, can you at least make a photo that's not blurred into oblivion?
We need to re-think our place in space time. We are not zero or have a concept of actual zero. The cos constant (ç) should be the new "zero". It is
also the threshold of time. (ç) is timeless. Think of photon particles in a vacuum. Ageless.. Beautiful..
Time dilation exists, this negative time dilation must also be plausible. The logical answer is beyond (ç).
If you cannot explain your understanding of Physics to a really hot woman who works in a small town diner, you do not understand physics.
Your being rude.
Your saying that if it were possible for an object to exceed the speed of light with technology outside of say a warp bubble?
That object would travel backwards in time and also recovery is possible in that the object could return to its origin time line.
Electron migration fits in with such a potential loosely if one wants to go their but your still essentially talking about a thought experiment.
Its like saying that an object with mass enters a black hole and because of something inherent to nature. its accelerated to above the speed of light
and as a result ends up a part of the big bang.
There are a lot of members in good standing who are lay persona but are really interested in understanding and learning.