It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That was me that said that Bro. I do agree and have felt that he is not going anywhere. There will likely be no Hillary, Trump, or Sanders in the Whitehouse ever
originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: BO XIAN
If it's not a topic why did you bring it up? You have blatantly inserted random "Obama is Barry Soetero and his father is a cult leader" in how many threads? More than I count on both hands.
I think it's you who has flawed information. You've made claims about Obama that you can't prove and then say its not a topic!!!!!
originally posted by: ketsuko
I think you have to be careful when you are talking about a prophet who isn't authentic, and by that meaning somehow who doesn't have an accurate prediction rate. First off, we know any Godly prophet is 100% accurate, so that follows that anyone who isn't is either more or less making stuff up or being guided by powers less than Godly.
If the latter, you may get nuggets of truth mixed in with creative lies, but you won't be able to tell which it is until it's too late meaning you might as well not have gotten the prophecy at all because it serves to make you react in adverse ways.
Look at most of the Biblical prophecy ... we either know what but have no real idea when, or we might have a guess of when but have no idea of what or something similar. What we need to know we do, but we don't know enough to put the pieces together and truly know the future. We aren't meant to, not until it's upon us.
originally posted by: fleabit
Imho, I think it's ridiculous to say something along the lines of "Here is a prediction, but it's not a discussion of the merits of the source." How can it not be? It's a rather flimsy way to start a discussion.
Also how many Jihadis have you had come through Mexico?
originally posted by: BO XIAN
The WH imposter staying around
Though he's also got his eyes on the UN spot and would love to fancy himself ruler of the world.
Reportedly after his first inauguration, he walked into the WH and was handed a big manila envelope from his bosses. He collapsed in a chair and was heard to mutter: "They've made me a scapegoat."
originally posted by: BO XIAN
your assertions and the reality I observe.
originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: butcherguy
Yes vigilance is a good thing. But the hard truth is that there are only 100-200,000 jihadists worldwide. That's a fraction of 1 % of the Muslim population. You have that many people bring shot in your country every year yet I doubt you would want tighter gun control.
originally posted by: BO XIAN
originally posted by: chr0naut
Could the population of Europe be decimated by terrorist attacks and Europe left almost deserted. Just nope. Spatially the area is vast. Europe is organized, armed, fortified and trained ready for response. Even the World Wars were insufficient to decimate the populace. IMHO that prophecy simply cannot happen.
THANKS! That's just the sort of discussion I want to have in this thread.
What about . . . throw in WWIII in the midst of the Muslim invasion, terror attacks etc. etc. ???
I don't necessarily see the whole of Europe a glass parking lot.
I don't think it would take all that many sizeable nukes
plus all that many bio-engineered plagues
plus whatever super secret exotic weapons we haven't heard of
plus whatever might be true about some pretend ET/Fallen angel critters being destructive in the same geography
plus weather weapons
plus volcanoes perhaps unleashed by all the nuke blasts
plus horrendous sun spots
. . . to render 90+% of the geography functionally uninhabitable.
Then there's the Biblical--"Except the days be shortened, no flesh would be saved."