It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by devilwasp
the weapons are quite horrific and can hardly be controlled.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Non-lethal or physically damaging chemical weapons such as the 'sex bomb' are probably good ideas, but not any dangerous ones.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
It's not dirty bombs it's the neutron bomb. The neutron bomb is the ultimate clean bomb. It's a hydrogen thermonuclear bomb that is not detonated by a uranium or plutonium bomb. It is detonated high above the target causing a radiation burst that kills but doesn't leave any residual radioactive fallout or pollution.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Well...do you guys think its ok to use a dirty bomb?
You know one where it only kills people?
Originally posted by AtheiX
A dirty bomb is intended usually ONLY to harm innocent people and is deployed usually where it would do so. Of course this causes me to be against dirty bombs.
Originally posted by dacruz
wow, thats bad guys...hows that: take the leaders of the fighting countrys together, that they can fight each other in a e.g. boxing ring?..this may could spare some lives..without chemical and and other weapons .just a thought.