It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: username74
a reply to: Harte
yeah like i say, i accept it works, its surely how you'd crush burnt limestone just not so well on a granite bedrock floor as it were. you would want kind of be trying to scrape down a wall. and i reckon it would work a little on a roughed up surface
i read a study by some bod who had took his glasses off and banged away at some granite for 5 hours and he created whatever amount of powder.
as to recognising it in a mortar. unlikely. its only quartz mica and feldspar to begin with. how would you distinguish it from the sand around it anyway? but the product is more like talc. a thousand blows from a rounded boulder and its pretty fine. thats why it would be important to get it cleaned up if you did it en mass, it will cushion the blows if you really are removing granite in that way, but if you are after grout its pure.
i think aeolian sand in the desert is spherical, referring back to our plastifiers, so its either too dry or to sloppy in the mix. it wont take water and dries too fast in the heat
good for horse arenas and such though.
originally posted by: username74
a reply to: Harte
well , heres some relevant info regarding this and some other points we discussed
an interesting abstract from a pounder study, i wont paraphrase and ruin it
www.jstor.org...
i remembered that i think the bod was engelbach. but his study wildly differs from lehners(was he the chap quoted in the baalbek thread?)
originally posted by: username74and i shall have to read this.
archive.org...
originally posted by: username74
a reply to: Harte
so i see you rate that material in the abstract as musings
originally posted by: username74
well there plenty of granite near me. i ll have to look for the dolerite of meta dolerite but maybe i can sort out a little test of this technique and put up some photos. merely for curiosity and background. it might take a while but if you have any suggestions..
originally posted by: LightAssassin
a reply to: Granite
Nope, just an ATS glitch. Stars counts for members are no longer valid.
originally posted by: LightAssassin
a reply to: Marduk
LOL....and you cant do math.
3405 posts
57,801,551 stars
=
16975 stars per post.
Nope.