It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: olaru12
Well what do you expect form Oklahoma and Nebraska; Forward thinking progressive comprehension of reality?
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: olaru12
Well what do you expect form Oklahoma and Nebraska; Forward thinking progressive comprehension of reality?
Even backwards ass thinking realizes dollar signs. I think they are more jealous over seeing what kind of tax revenue Colorado is taking in than it "spreading over the borders".
Just my 2c
Nebraska and Oklahoma said Colorado's decriminalization has "increased the flow of marijuana over their borders," forcing them to expend greater "law enforcement, judicial system, and penal system resources," thereby harming the welfare of their residents.
originally posted by: Sillyosaurus
a reply to: lovebeck
The price point is incorrect. The idea of the legalization is to flood the market so that no one makes money and it stops being a 'market' item. I mean maybe you could spend money at the store or you can grow more than enough for the year in your backyard.
The real issue is it is a plant that just grows like that. And Colorado recognizes the right to grow plants. Just because neighboring states say they don't like it does not make it illegal. Individuals who break the law and they may be punished per the local laws; this does not void the law of the land in Colorado.