What sort of coincidence is it that the "BLM" is both Bureau of LM and Black LM?

Someone please tell me.

Because from here it looks like disgruntled white taxpayers view the acronym BLM as the bad guys when disgruntled black taxpayers view BLM as a curiously popular positive and self-evident slogan relating to recent murders.
As in divide and conquer in a narrative where the head of state and commander in chief of the armed forces is both black and white.

As in telly says "them whites hates BLM" and in the same newsflash "them blacks love BLM" so there's three parties instead of two (only one of which does not pick their own clothes, gets paid to shoot first and faces no law of man).

Is the ministry of truth not even trying any more? What would that imply?
That level of confidence surely isn't taken lightly because the information industry involves expenses.
=> Strategically, subtlety supersedes until urgency.

Or maybe I'm just imagining things.

I hope this is a duplicate thread, the original of which I missed.

a reply to: wisvol

Complete coincidence.
The Bureau of Land Management has been around much longer than Black Lives Matter. Don't believe anything you see on TV.

a reply to: DAVID64

Thank you for your answer. You said you work in law enforcement, right?

Most importantly, can someone tell me why the "socialist secular Jew candidate" who says he's a fan of MLK says nothing on his many broadcasts about this?

a reply to: wisvol

Trying to whip up a conspiracy are we on a slow Sunday morning?

a reply to: wisvol

NO! I am not, nor ever have been, a member of law enforcement.

a reply to: Aliensun

Thank you for posting.


It seems odd that , even though as pointed by David64:

The Bureau of Land Management has been around much longer than Black Lives Matter

The blood spilling affairs related to the BLMs are broadcast within the same programs.

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: wisvol

NO! I am not, nor ever have been, a member of law enforcement.

My mistake. Must have misread one of your posts earlier.

a reply to: wisvol

I've noticed the same phenomenom... not just with BLM either. For example, about the time that the fraudclosures were coming to light at the time of the mortgage meltdown, I noticed that the acronym "MERS" was being used for both the "Mortgage Electronic Recording System," as well as the "Middle East Respiratory Syndrome." I've noticed it other times as well. It does seem more than a coincidence that the same acronym with different meanings pops up simultaneously. Thirty years ago it would have just been an oddity. But with the internet, these acronyms seem to very conveniently confuse and obfuscate issues.

a reply to: Boadicea

I am glad to be made aware or such cases, despicable as their essence is. Thank you.

It does seem that some smaller pearls of language have been cast before swine, possibly through stealing people's correspondence, a tactic no man of honour indulges in.

Surely the "if you have nothing to hide" mantra doesn't go as far as contradicting religious values, or does it?

The sith are definitely "using the force" right about now.

a reply to: Boadicea

I noticed that the acronym "MERS" was being used for both the "Mortgage Electronic Recording System," as well as the "Middle East Respiratory Syndrome." I've noticed it other times as well. It does seem more than a coincidence that the same acronym with different meanings pops up simultaneously.

Good eye. Thats why I come to ATS, to read what others spot.

Another tactic, naming new terrorist organizations every time they invade another country, the confusion they intend to sow covers the truth.

a reply to: wisvol

The sith are definitely "using the force" right about now.

Yes, indeed! Full force...

a reply to: intrptr

Yes! And different folks using different names for the same folks doing different things. For example, one reporter tells that ISIS did such and such here... another reporter tells us that IS did this and that there... and another reporter tells us that ISIL did blah, blah, blah elsewhere. ISIS is bad in Iraq... but ISIS is wonderful backing the rebels in Syria!

It's impossible for the average person to keep track. Sometimes the best I know is that I don't know and I can't know because someone is working very hard to make sure I don't know.

a reply to: Boadicea

Don't sweat it, you are seeing clearly. A good rule of thumb is to consider the opposite of what they say, too.

Edit: Like the BLM is managing 'land', not the people living there. Or in arguments about the land, the focus always shifts to terrorism, not territory. This applies when discussing Palestinians vs Jews also, and when discussing interventions as opposed to invasions.

Keep telling it like it is.

a reply to: intrptr

Like the BLM is managing 'land', not the people living there. Or in arguments about the land, the focus always shifts to terrorism, not territory. This applies when discussing Palestinians vs Jews also, and when discussing interventions as opposed to invasions.

Ah yes... opposite land. Thank you for putting it in that perspective for me. That's definitely something to think about and keep in mind going forward. (My hubby just said I got "that lightbulb" look as I read your comment and asked me what I was reading!)

a reply to: intrptr

This applies when discussing Palestinians vs Jews also, and when discussing interventions as opposed to invasions.

It certainly does.

Why express it as "Palestinians vs Jews" is beyond me when one is a nationality and the other isn't.
Israelis are not all Jews by far, many are Muslim and Christian for instance. Furthermore, those who do not follow the ten commandments (murderers and such) are neither.
It's like saying "Jihadis" when referring to mercenaries, which equates BLM bull#, with religion as skin colour. Jihad is an internal struggle within the heart of man.

Also, the "Israeli-Palestinian" wars are fought with foreign weapons, the largest share of which are from that weird Uncle (dad's big brother? interesting linguistic twist there).
As an Israeli I feel the difference, as all lives, matters.

Cheers

For some reason, I've never associated Black LM with tax paying of any sort.

What sort of coincidence? A bad one. Land management was around before people decided to believe in making excuses for poor decision making.

a reply to: wisvol

Why express it as "Palestinians vs Jews" is beyond me when one is a nationality and the other isn't.

Palestinians, what are they? Just Gazans and West Bankians now.

Referring to Palestine as Israel is the acceptable norm. Calling them Palestinians when that place no longer exists is disingenuous.

Only Israel and "Israelis", and "Palestinians" to keep up appearances.

As an Israeli I feel the difference, as all lives, matters.

Sorry, I didn't mean to insult you personally, just question the policy of the US in regards to Israel, the dual standard and hypocrisy.

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: wisvol

Complete coincidence.
The Bureau of Land Management has been around much longer than Black Lives Matter. Don't believe anything you see on TV.

But all the people who work in Bureau of Land Management are black....hmmmm

a reply to: wisvol

The first experience I can think of with this kind of apparent obfuscation (whether accidental, coincidental, synchronistic or purposeful) was early on in the internet years. I'd been digging into the "Men in Black" since before my first free 30 hours of AOL. There was all kinds of interesting info on the net by '95. Then, it all got buried under the mass of MIB the movie.

There often seems to be something convenient to bury things. I've seen many other examples, can't think of them now, but have wondered whether the BLM thing is similar.

Of course, it could just be FInal Fantasy XI black mages trying to hide all trace of their existence.

originally posted by: mikeone718
For some reason, I've never associated Black LM with tax paying of any sort.

What sort of coincidence? A bad one. Land management was around before people decided to believe in making excuses for poor decision making.

You haven't, because it's an indirect link, check it out:

1. people protest
2. some of them go missing and some are shot dead on cameras that don't get confiscated or bricked
3. the shooters are paid by tax
4. profit

Your second point: wrong. Bad decision making dates back to at least 1642 AD.

Thanks for (name a positive way to qualify your contribution yourself, no time here)